Cited by 190Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesSubcritical and Supercritical Water ProcessesCatalysis for Biomass Conversion

Hydrothermal catalytic production of fuels and chemicals from aquatic biomass

Open access
Yeh, Thomas M., Dickinson, Jacob G., Franck, Allison, Linic, Suljo, Thompson, Levi T., Savage, Phillip E.·2013·Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology

Abstract

One of the promising avenues for biomass processing is the use of water as a reaction medium for wet or aquatic biomass. This review focuses on the hydrothermal catalytic production of fuels and chemicals from aquatic biomass. Two different regimes for conversion of aquatic biomass in hydrothermal conditions are discussed in detail. The first is hydrothermal liquefaction, and the second is hydrothermal gasification. The goals of these processes are to produce liquid‐fuel‐range hydrocarbons and methane or hydrogen, respectively. The catalytic upgrading of biocrude resulting from noncatalytic liquefaction and the stability and degradation of catalysts in high temperature water are also discussed. The review concludes with a brief discussion of the outlook for and opportunities within the field of hydrothermal catalytic valorization of biomass. Copyright © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jctb.3933

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeh, T. M., Dickinson, J. G., Franck, A., Linic, S., Thompson, L. T., & Savage, P. E.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Savage, Phillip E.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-19
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
13-24
ISSN
  • 0142-0356 (ISSN-L)
  • 0268-2575
  • 1097-4660
OpenAlex
W1740989601
Cited by
190
References
69
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0937992)
  • Division of Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI-0937992)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
Keywords
aquatic biomass, hydrothermal liquefaction, hydrothermal gasification, bio-oil upgrading, catalyst stability, catalyst deactivation, liquid fuels, methane production, hydrogen production, biomass valorization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review