Cited by 1,047COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Diagnostic utility of clinical laboratory data determinations for patients with the severe COVID‐19

Open access
Gao, Yong, Li, Tuantuan, Han, Mingfeng, Li, Xiuyong, Wu, Dong, Xu, Yuanhong, Zhu, Yulin, Liu, Yan +2 more·2020·Journal of Medical Virology

Abstract

The role of clinical laboratory data in the differential diagnosis of the severe forms of COVID‐19 has not been definitely established. The aim of this study was to look for the warning index in severe COVID‐19 patients. We investigated 43 adult patients with COVID‐19. The patients were classified into mild group (28 patients) and severe group (15 patients). A comparison of the hematological parameters between the mild and severe groups showed significant differences in interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), d‐dimer (d‐D), glucose, thrombin time, fibrinogen, and C‐reactive protein (P < .05). The optimal threshold and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) of IL‐6 were 24.3 and 0.795 µg/L, respectively, while those of d‐D were 0.28 and 0.750 µg/L, respectively. The area under the ROC curve of IL‐6 combined with d‐D was 0.840. The specificity of predicting the severity of COVID‐19 during IL‐6 and d‐D tandem testing was up to 93.3%, while the sensitivity of IL‐6 and d‐D by parallel test in the severe COVID‐19 was 96.4%. IL‐6 and d‐D were closely related to the occurrence of severe COVID‐19 in the adult patients, and their combined detection had the highest specificity and sensitivity for early prediction of the severity of COVID‐19 patients, which has important clinical value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmv.25770

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 present elevated levels of IL-6, IL-10, IL-1β, INF-γ, CCL2, TNF-α, CXCL10, CCL7, IL-1 receptor antagonist and IL-2 receptor, supposedly associated with disease severity.

    “Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 present elevated levels of IL-6, IL-10, IL-1β, INF-γ, CCL2, TNF-α, CXCL10, CCL7, IL-1 receptor antagonist and IL-2 receptor, supposedly associated with disease severity [9, 98–105].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, Y., Li, T., Han, M., Li, X., Wu, D., Xu, Y., Zhu, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, X., & Wang, L.
Affiliations
  • Fuyang Second People's Hospital (CN)
  • Department of Pharmacy Fuyang People's Hospital Fuyang Anhui China
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN)
  • Anhui Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Xiaowu
  • Wang, Linding
Venue
Journal of Medical Virology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-10
Volume
92
Issue
7
Pages
791-796
ISSN
  • 0146-6615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9071
OpenAlex
W3012422150
Cited by
1,047
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 191 · 2021: 310 · 2020: 350 · 2019: 1
FWCI
31.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1708085MH193)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
severe COVID-19, interleukin-6, D-dimer, disease severity prediction, diagnostic biomarkers, thrombin time, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, hematological parameters, combined biomarker detection
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Testing, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, C-Reactive Protein, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products, Fibrinogen, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Thrombin Time, Biomarkers, Interleukin-6, Coronavirus Infections, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Area Under Curve, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Diabetes Complications, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review