Cited by 445Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceSocial Skills and EducationEgo Development and Educational Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The case for the ability‐based model of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior

Daus, Catherine S., Ashkanasy, Neal M.·2005·Journal of Organizational Behavior

Abstract

In this second counterpoint article, we refute the claims of Landy, Locke, and Conte, and make the more specific case for our perspective, which is that ability‐based models of emotional intelligence have value to add in the domain of organizational psychology. In this article, we address remaining issues, such as general concerns about the tenor and tone of the debates on this topic, a tendency for detractors to collapse across emotional intelligence models when reviewing the evidence and making judgments, and subsequent penchant to thereby discount all models, including the ability‐based one, as lacking validity. We specifically refute the following three claims from our critics with the most recent empirically based evidence: (1) emotional intelligence is dominated by opportunistic ‘academics‐turned‐consultants’ who have amassed much fame and fortune based on a concept that is shabby science at best; (2) the measurement of emotional intelligence is grounded in unstable, psychometrically flawed instruments, which have not demonstrated appropriate discriminant and predictive validity to warrant/justify their use; and (3) there is weak empirical evidence that emotional intelligence is related to anything of importance in organizations. We thus end with an overview of the empirical evidence supporting the role of emotional intelligence in organizational and social behavior. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/job.321

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Bar‐On R., 1997, Bar‐On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ‐I): Technical manual
  2. Brackett M. A., 2004, Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrating perspectives on intellectual functioning, 175
  3. Cage T. Daus C. S. &Saul K.(2004).An examination of emotional skill job satisfaction and retail performance. Paper submitted to the 19th Annual Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology as part of the symposium.
  4. Coetzee C. &Schaap P.(2004).The relationship between leadership styles and emotional intelligence. Paper presented at the 6th Annual Conference for the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology Sandton South Africa.
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.989 · DOI
  6. Denisi A. S.(Chair). (2003).Emotional intelligence. Special event presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Chicago. (CD of proceedings available from The Digital Record Inc. Alexandria VA.)
  7. Giles S. J. S.(2001).The role of supervisory emotional intelligence in direct report organizational commitment. Master's thesis University of New South Wales Sydney Australia.
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.36.1.1 · DOI
  9. Janovics J. &Christiansen N. D.(2002).Emotional intelligence in the workplace. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology San Diego CA.
  10. Kouzes J., 1990, Measures of Leadership, 205
  11. Kruml S. M., 2000, Emotions in the workplace: Theory, research, and practice, 177
  12. Lopes P. N. Côté S. Grewal D. Kadis J. Gall M. &Salovey P.(2005).Evidence that emotional intelligence is related to job performance interpersonal facilitation affect and attitudes at work and leadership potential. Manuscript under review.
  13. Mayer J. D., 1997, Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational applications, 3
  14. Mayer J. D., 2000, Handbook of emotional intelligence, 92
  15. Rice C. L.(1999).A quantitative study of emotional intelligence and its impact on team performance. Master's thesis Pepperdine University.
  16. Sala F., 2002, Emotional Competence Inventory: Technical manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 445

Metadata

Authors
Daus, C. S., & Ashkanasy, N. M.
Affiliations
  • Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Daus, Catherine S.
Venue
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04-14
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
453-466
ISSN
  • 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1379
OpenAlex
W2156940752
Cited by
441
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 29
FWCI
24.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Ego Development and Educational Practices
Keywords
emotional intelligence, emotional intelligence assessment, psychometric validity, discriminant validity, predictive validity, organizational behavior, social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review