Cited by 71Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsBone Metabolism and DiseasesCell Adhesion Molecules Research

Potential role for a specialized β3 integrin‐based structure on osteocyte processes in bone mechanosensation

Open access
Cabahug‐Zuckerman, Pamela, Stout, Randy F., Majeska, Robert J., Thi, Mia M., Spray, David C., Weinbaum, Sheldon, Schaffler, Mitchell B.·2018·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

Osteocyte processes are an order of magnitude more sensitive to mechanical loading than their cell bodies. The mechanisms underlying this remarkable mechanosensitivity are not clear, but may be related to the infrequent α V β 3 integrin sites where the osteocyte cell processes attach to canalicular walls. These sites develop dramatically elevated strains during load‐induced fluid flow in the lacunar‐canalicular system and were recently shown to be primary sites for osteocyte‐like MLO‐Y4 cell mechanotransduction. These α V β 3 integrin sites lack typical integrin transduction mechanisms. Rather, stimulation at these sites alters Ca 2+ signaling, ATP release and membrane potential. In the current studies, we tested the hypothesis that in authentic osteocytes in situ, key membrane proteins implicated in osteocyte mechanotransduction are preferentially localized at or near to β 3 integrin‐foci. We analyzed these spatial relationships in mouse bone osteocytes using immunohistochemistry combined with Structured Illumination Super Resolution Microscopy, a method that permits structural resolution at near electron microscopy levels in tissue sections. We discovered that the purinergic channel pannexin1, the ATP‐gated purinergic receptor P2 × 7R and the low voltage transiently opened T‐type calcium channel CaV3.2–1 all reside in close proximity to β 3 integrin attachment foci on osteocyte processes, suggesting a specialized mechanotransduction complex at these sites. We further confirmed this observation on isolated osteocytes in culture using STochasitc Optical Resonance Microscopy. These findings identify a possible structural basis for the unique mechanosensation and transduction capabilities of the osteocyte process. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:642–652, 2018.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jor.23792

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Osteocytes might sense FFSS through collagen hillocks, β3 and β1 integrins, primary cilia, connexin43, and mechanosensitive ion channels such as Piezo1.

    “Osteocytes might sense FFSS through 1. “collagen hillocks”, which are collagen matrix projections in osteocyte canaliculi that directly link the matrix to osteocyte dendrites;29 2. β3 and β1 integrins, which participate to focal adhesion kinase (FAK) complex formation in osteocyte dendritic projections;30 3. primary cilia, which have a flow-sensing function that leads to increased osteoprotegerin”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cabahug‐Zuckerman, P., Stout, R. F., Majeska, R. J., Thi, M. M., Spray, D. C., Weinbaum, S., & Schaffler, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering The City College of New York New York New York
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • City College of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Schaffler, Mitchell B.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-28
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
642-652
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W2765810049
Cited by
71
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Research® (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR041210, AR057139, AR060445)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University (P30CA013330, SIG‐ 1S10OD18218‐1)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS092466)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
Keywords
osteocyte mechanotransduction, CD61, pannexin 1, P2X7 receptor, lacunar-canalicular system, fluid flow
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Osteocytes, Receptors, Purinergic, Connexins, Calcium Channels, T-Type, Integrin beta3, Mechanotransduction, Cellular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review