Cited by 66Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

Development of the yeast flora of whole-crop maize during ensiling and during subsequent aerobiosis

Open access
Middelhoven, Wouter J., van Baalen, Anja H. M.·1988·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

Abstract The fresh maize plant was inhabited by non‐fermenting basidiomycetous yeast species, viz. Candida ingeniosa, Cryptococcus laurentii, Sporobolomyces roseus, Sporidiobolus salmonicolor and Rhodotorula rubra. These species had vanished after 2 days of anaerobiosis in a laboratory‐scale silo. After this time, ascomycetous species tolerant to acetic acid were isolated. Successively Candida holmii, C. milleri, C. krusei, C. lambica, C. famata, Geotrichum candidum and Hansenula anomala were encountered. Except for C. famata and G. candidum these yeasts vigorously ferment glucose. Total yeast counts were 107 g−1 during the first 2 weeks and gradually decreased to about 105 g−1 after 4 months. This shows that anaerobic silage provides an adverse environment for yeasts. Exposure of maize silage to air resulted in complete consumption of lactic and acetic acids within 5 days. This was due to growth of C. hoimii, C. lambica and C. milled. The physiologically similar yeast species C. holmii and C. milled were both abundant from the early stage of the fermentation and during aerobiosis. However, C. milled predominated in the first 2 weeks of anaerobiosis. The less frequently occurring yeast species C. famata, G. candidum and H. anomala assimilated lactic acid and ethanol as well as minor products of bacterial sugar fermentation such as acetoin and butan‐2,3‐diol but not diacetyl.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.2740420303

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Middelhoven, W. J., & van Baalen, A. H. M.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-01
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
199-207
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W2147998729
Cited by
66
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Keywords
corn silage, yeast flora, silage fermentation, anaerobic fermentation, aerobic exposure, Candida, Geotrichum candidum, Wickerhamomyces anomalus, acetic acid tolerance, glucose fermentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review