Consumer vulnerability to scams, swindles, and fraud: A new theory of visceral influences on persuasion
Abstract
Scams exact a huge toll on consumers and society at large, with annual costs in the United States alone exceeding $100 billion. The global proliferation of the Internet has enabled con artists to export their craft to a rapidly expanding market and reach previously untapped consumers. In spite of the prevalence of scams around the world, there has been virtually no academic attention devoted to understanding the factors that might account for why individuals differ in their scamming vulnerability. Building on the background of elder consumer disadvantage and informed by the authors' own survey of expert opinion, this article presents a tentative theory of scamming vulnerability. The proposed theory incorporates the effects of visceral influences on consumer response to scam offers and hypothesizes a role for various moderating factors such as self‐control, gullibility, susceptibility to interpersonal influence, and scam knowledge. Theoretical propositions are provided for future empirical investigation. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Langenderfer and Shimp argue that victims of fraud make decision errors.
“In another untested theoretical paper, they argue that victims of fraud make decision errors.”
From The Scammers Persuasive Techniques Model: Development of a Stage Model to Explain the Online Dating Romance Scam (2013) · cites this paper as Langenderfer and Shimp 2001
When visceral influences are high, highly motivated individuals are more likely to miss clues in the message that would alert them to the scam and more likely to be conned.
“Langenderfer and Shimp believe that when visceral influences are high, individuals who are highly motived are more likely to miss the clues in the message that would alert them to the scam.”
From The Scammers Persuasive Techniques Model: Development of a Stage Model to Explain the Online Dating Romance Scam (2013) · cites this paper as Langenderfer and Shimp 2001
Scam messages address basic needs such as greed.
“Scam messages, they contend, address basic needs such as greed (e.g., earning large sums of money).”
From The Scammers Persuasive Techniques Model: Development of a Stage Model to Explain the Online Dating Romance Scam (2013) · cites this paper as Langenderfer and Shimp 2001
The scammer creates viscerally oriented rewards, which the victim is likely to have a very high motivation to earn.
“They argue that the scammer creates viscerally oriented rewards, which the victim is likely to have a very high motivation to earn.”
From The Scammers Persuasive Techniques Model: Development of a Stage Model to Explain the Online Dating Romance Scam (2013) · cites this paper as Langenderfer and Shimp 2001
When visceral influences are minimal, more motivated individuals focus on nonreward message arguments and are more likely to recognise deception and avoid being scammed.
“In contrast, they argue, that for those who are more motivated, when visceral influences are minimal, it is expected that individuals will focus more on the nonreward message arguments rather than the reward per se. Under these conditions, they believe the individual is more likely to recognise the deception and avoid being scammed.”
From The Scammers Persuasive Techniques Model: Development of a Stage Model to Explain the Online Dating Romance Scam (2013) · cites this paper as Langenderfer and Shimp 2001
Researchers have found that victims of scams often experience visceral triggers; that is, they focus on the prize and imagine positive future emotional states.
“As explained earlier in this paper, researchers have found that victims of scams often experience visceral triggers; that is, they focus on the prize and imagine positive future emotional states.”
From The Scammers Persuasive Techniques Model: Development of a Stage Model to Explain the Online Dating Romance Scam (2013) · cites this paper as Langenderfer and Shimp 2001
Cites
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984 · see citing works
Delay of gratification in children.
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2658056 · Cited by 3,397 · see citing works
Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior
Loewenstein, G. (1996) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0028 · Cited by 2,610 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Building Understanding of the Domain of Consumer Vulnerability
Baker, S. M., Gentry, J. W., & Rittenburg, T. L. (2005) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/0276146705280622 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
Pratt, T. C., Holtfreter, K., & Reisig, M. D. (2010) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427810365903 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
The Concept of Hope and its Relevance to Product Evaluation and Choice
MacInnis, D. J., & de Mello, G. D. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.1.1.55513 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
“Scams and fraud deprive U.S. consumers of more than $100 billion annually (Langenderfer and Shimp 2001).”
BackgroundHill, R. P., & Sharma, E. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1161 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
“For instance, Langenderfer and Shimp (2001) described why and how gullibility and interpersonal influence make consumers vulnerable to marketing scams, especially with the rise of the Internet.”
BackgroundWang, J., Herath, T. C., Chen, R., Vishwanath, A., & Rao, H. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2012.2208392 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
“Visceral triggers (for example, stressing urgency of response) are motivational manipulations that scammers use to reduce the depth at which people process information, allowing decision errors to occur [10], [11].”
BackgroundInfluentialFinancial Fraud: A Literature Review
Reurink, A. (2018) · Contemporary Topics in Finance · doi:10.1111/joes.12294 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Whitty, M. T. (2013) · British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azt009 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
“The elaboration likelihood model (Petty and Cacioppo 1986) is believed by some (Rusch 1999; Langenderfer and Shimp 2001) to be a useful model to explain why some individuals are scammed by mass marketing fraud.”
MethodOnline frauds: Learning from victims why they fall for these scams
Button, M., Nicholls, C. M., Kerr, J., & Owen, R. (2014) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/0004865814521224 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
“Visceral appeals Visceral appeal was another key finding in the Office of Fair Trading (2009) research as well as some other studies which have explored scammers (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001; Kienpointner, 2006).”
BackgroundResultWorkman, M. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20779 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
The Role of Reputation Systems in Reducing On-Line Auction Fraud
Gregg, D. G., & Scott, J. E. (2006) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415100304 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“Unscrupulous con artists routinely victimize consumers, and many of the prevention efforts undertaken to date have failed [44].”
BackgroundIndividual differences in susceptibility to online influence: A theoretical review
Williams, E., Beardmore, A., & Joinson, A. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.002 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
“The perpetrators of online scams create scenarios in which a target feels suf fi ciently con fi dent to respond, often using emotionally oriented triggers related to panic, excitement, curiosity or empathy, to encourage errors in judgement and decision making (Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001).”
Background'Bought it, but Never Got it' Assessing Risk Factors for Online Consumer Fraud Victimization
van Wilsem, J. (2011) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcr053 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
“, 2010) or fraud experts (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001).”
Consumer cynicism: antecedents and consequences
Chylinski, M., & Chu, A. (2010) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090561011032720 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
The psychology of internet fraud victimisation: A systematic review
Norris, G., Brookes, A., & Dowell, D. (2019) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-019-09334-5 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Financial fraud among older Americans: Evidence and implications
DeLiema, M., Deevy, M., Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2020) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gby151 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
“22 This might help explain why losses tend to be even greater for older adults when they have an existing personal relationship with a scammer.”
BackgroundEmotional arousal may increase susceptibility to fraud in older and younger adults.
Kircanski, K., Notthoff, N., DeLiema, M., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Shadel, D., Mottola, G., Carstensen, L. L., & Gotlib, I. H. (2018) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000228 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
“By their very nature, visceral factors consume decision-making resources and motivate individuals to act immediately based on instinct (Langenderfer & Shrimp, 2001).”
BackgroundThe design of phishing studies: Challenges for researchers
Parsons, K., McCormac, A., Pattinson, M., Butavicius, M., & Jerram, C. (2015) · Computers & security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2015.02.008 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Fischer, P., Lea, S. E. G., & Evans, K. M. (2013) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12158 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Consumer and Business Deception on the Internet: Content Analysis of Documentary Evidence
Grazioli, S., & Järvenpää, S. L. (2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044283 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Jarvenpaa, S., & Majchrzak, A. (2010) · Information systems research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0320 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Do Nudges Reduce Disparities? Choice Architecture Compensates for Low Consumer Knowledge
Mrkva, K., Posner, N., Reeck, C., & Johnson, E. J. (2021) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242921993186 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“For other marketing manipulations such as scams, previous research has suggested that vulnerable consumers (e.g., those who are elderly or less educated) are sometimes targeted and impacted to a greater extent (Hill 1995; Hill and Sharma 2020; Langenderfer and Shimp 2001).”
BackgroundThe Effects of Loneliness on Telemarketing Fraud Vulnerability Among Older Adults
Alves, L. M., & Wilson, S. R. (2008) · Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1300/j084v20n01_04 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“…research has suggested a relationship between loneliness and older adult telemarketing fraud susceptibility (Friedman, 1992; Kang & Ridgway, 1996; Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001; Lee & Geitsfeld, 1997; Lee & Soberon-Ferrer, 1997), a descriptive design provides evidence substantiating or negating the…”
BackgroundThreats to Hope: Effects on Reasoning about Product Information
de Mello, G. D., MacInnis, D. J., & Stewart, D. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/519144 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
The psychology of the internet fraud victimization of older adults: A systematic review
Shang, Y., Wu, Z., Du, X., Jiang, Y., Ma, B., & Chi, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912242 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
“The mechanism makes victims highly motivated to reply or click on the link (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001; Fischer et al., 2008; Kircanski et al., 2018).”
BackgroundFinancial literacy and fraud detection——Evidence from China
Wei, L., Peng, M., & Wu, W. (2021) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2021.06.017 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Saunderson, S., & Nejat, G. (2021) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abd5186 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“Older adults have previously shown to be more susceptible to persuasive influence due to factors such as lower awareness of persuasion, social isolation, and psychological loss ( 96 , 97 ).”
BackgroundWalsh, G., & Mitchell, V. (2005) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/0276146705280613 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“…researchers have attempted to identify and profile vulnerable consumers using sociodemographic variables such as age, income, ethnicity, and race (e.g., Andreasen and Manning 1990; Benet, Pitts, and LaTour 1993; Andreasen 1993; Smith and Cooper-Martin 1997; Langenderfer and Shimp 2001; Hill 2002).”
BackgroundMethodPhishing, Personality Traits and FacebookPreprint
Halevi, T., Lewis, J., & Memon, N. (2013) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.7643 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“In [19], Langenderfer et al. identified the fact that scam messages often attempt to present a unique opportunity and require urgent response.”
BackgroundWang, F., & Zhou, X. (2023) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2022.2051109 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Scam Compliance and the Psychology of Persuasion
Modic, D., & Lea, S. E. G. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2364464 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“Langenderfer and Shimp (2001) have shown that lack of self-control increases the likelihood of being swindled as individuals have a harder time regulating their emotional responses when their ability to control themselves is lowered.”
Understanding Hope and Its Implications for Consumer Behavior: I Hope, Therefore I Consume
MacInnis, D. J., & Chun, H. E. (2007) · Foundations and Trends® in Marketing · doi:10.1561/1700000005 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“Lazarus (1999a; see also Rycroft, 1979) opines, "A fundamental condition of yearning and hope is that our current life circumstance is unsatisfactory--that is, it involves deprivation" (pg. 653). Thus a gambler down to his last few dollars will experience more yearning and greater hope for winning the lottery than the…”
BackgroundA Multiple Stakeholder Perspective on Responsibility in Advertising
Polonsky, M., & Hyman, M. (2007) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367360200 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Examining the antecedents and consequences of gratitude
Hasan, S. E., Mortimer, G., Lings, I., & Neale, L. (2017) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-01-2016-0048 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“Other researchers highlight factors such as customer scams (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001), fraud, deceptive practices, misleading advertising claims (Grazioli and Jarvenpaa, 2003), and customer litigation (Golann, 1990, Chylinski and Chu, 2010).”
BackgroundMacFarlane, D., Hurlstone, M. J., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine (1967) · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112790 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“Visceral influences are thought to create a short-term feeling of being ‘out of control’ (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001).”
BackgroundWe will make you like our research: The development of a susceptibility-to-persuasion scale
Modic, D., Anderson, R., & Palomäki, J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194119 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
The concept of consumer vulnerability: Scale development and validation
Shi, H.-Y., Jing, F.-J., Yang, Y., & Nguyen, B. (2017) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12390 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Virtual influencers and data privacy: Introducing the multi-privacy paradox
Liyanaarachchi, G., Mifsud, M., & Viglia, G. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114584 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
How Neurotic are Scam Victims, Really? The Big Five and Internet ScamsPreprint
Modic, D., & Lea, S. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2448130 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Deconstructing tourist scams: A social-practice-theory perspective
Xu, D., Pearce, P., & Chen, T.-Z. (2021) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104186 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Shao, J., Du, W., Lin, T., Li, X., Li, J., & Lei, H. (2019) · Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1080/08946566.2018.1564105 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“This finding supports our third hypothesis and is in line with the theory of visceral influences on persuasion (Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001).”
BackgroundResultSarofim, S., Minton, E. A., Hunting, A., Bartholomew, D. E., Zehra, S., Montford, W. J., Cabano, F. G., & Paul, P. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12315 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Wen, J., Yang, H., Zhang, Q., & Shao, J.-J. (2022) · Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1080/08946566.2021.2024105 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Liu, X.-L., & Zhang, L. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315731 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
"We Even Borrowed Money From Our Neighbor"
Razaq, L., Ahmad, T., Ibtasam, S., Ramzan, U., & Mare, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449115 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“Literature [37] suggests that victims’ trust in scammers is a factor in scam compliance leading to shift of victims’ focus on the interaction rather than the plausibility of the message.”
I Should Have Known Better: Development of a Self-Report Measure of Gullibility
Teunisse, A. K., Case, T. I., Fitness, J., & Sweller, N. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219858641 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Although research on the construct of gullibility per se has been sparse (e.g., Greenspan, 2009a; Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001; Mercier, 2017; Yamagishi, Kikuchi, & Kosugi, 1999), investigations into why people believe the implausible has a long tradition in psychology.”
BackgroundFinancial frauds’ victim profiles in developing countries
Lev, E. B., Maha, L., & Topliceanu, Ș. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999053 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“People with low self-control tend to take risks due to the urge for immediate gratification and are more vulnerable to falling as victims (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001; Schreck et al., 2006; Holtfreter et al., 2008).”
BackgroundAge Differences in How Consumers Behave Following Exposure to DTC Advertising
DeLorme, D., Huh, J., & Reid, L. N. (2006) · Health Communication · doi:10.1207/s15327027hc2003_5 · Cited by 37
“…including those of marketing and advertising strategies (Bailey, 1987; Benet et al., 1993; Butler, 1968; French & Crask, 1977; Gaeth & Heath, 1987; Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001; Lee & Geistfeld, 1999; Lee & Soberon-Ferrer, 1996, 1997; Lonial & Raju, 1990; McGhee, 1983; Smith et al., 1985;…”
Exploring the impact of packaging interactions on quality of life among older consumers
Ford, N., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2015.1123758 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“A number of researchers have explored older consumers’ susceptibility to fall victim of fraud through telemarketing or other unethical sales tactics (e.g. Alves & Wilson, 2008; Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001; Lee & Geistfeld, 1999; Lee & Soberon-Ferrer, 1997; McGhee, 1983).”
BackgroundUnderstanding the Risks of Financial Scams as Part of Elder Abuse Prevention
Fenge, L.-A., & Lee, S. (2018) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcy037 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Believing is buying: religiosity, advertising skepticism, and corporate trust
Minton, E. A. (2019) · Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion · doi:10.1080/14766086.2018.1437764 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“As Langenderfer and Shimp (2001) describe, vulnerability can also be connected to gullibility with consumers that are more trusting being more gullible and, as a result, more vulnerable to deceptive or persuasive marketing tactics.”
BackgroundWood, S., Liu, P.-J., Hanoch, Y., Xi, P. M., & Klapatch, L. (2018) · Journal of experimental psychology. Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000167 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Common tactics from Cialdini’s model of persuasion and social influence have also been proposed (Cialdini, 2006; Fischer, Lea, & Evans, 2013; Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001).”
Jones, H. S., Towse, J., & Race, N. J. P. (2015) · International Journal of Cyber Behavior Psychology and Learning · doi:10.4018/ijcbpl.2015070102 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
How Attachment Affects the Strength of Peer Influence on Adolescent Consumer Behavior
Huang, Y.-H., Wang, L., & Shi, J.-Q. (2012) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20543 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Bosley, S. A., & McKeage, K. K. (2015) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.13.086 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Lastly, research points to the role of urgency in scam recruitment, encouraging decisionmaking during “hot” rather than “cold” moments to limit information search and processing (Langenderfer and Shimp 2001).”
BackgroundMeasuring consumer vulnerability to perceived product-similarity problems and its consequences
Walsh, G., Mitchell, V., Kilian, T., & Miller, L. (2010) · doi:10.1080/02672570903441439 · Cited by 31
“Benet, Pitts, & LaTour, 1993 ; Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001 ) and consumers' limited economic power (e.”
BackgroundParti, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118741 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Research indicates that loneliness and isolation make individuals more willing to answer unknown phone calls (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001), and the presence of relatives and family members can function as an extra pair of eyes/ears that can prevent scams (DeLiema, 2018).”
BackgroundThe anatomy of written scam communications: An empirical analysis
Carter, E. (2015) · Crime Media Culture An International Journal · doi:10.1177/1741659015572310 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Others address combinations of scam practices (Modic and Lea, 2013), use differing lists of acts to define scams or fraudulent practices (Mason and Benson, 1996; Titus and Gover, 2001), or approach scams by practice type, such as face-to-face or two-way communication (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001).”
BackgroundFraud victimization and confidence in Florida's legal authorities
Reisig, M. D., & Holtfreter, K. (2007) · Journal of Financial Crime · doi:10.1108/13590790710742618 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“These include physical features, such as age ( Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001”
BackgroundBidgoli, M., & Grossklags, J. (2017) · APWG Symposium on Electronic Crime Research · doi:10.1109/ecrime.2017.7945055 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“In terms of mitigating one’s susceptibility to such fraud, having knowledge about scams is central [5], [6].”
BackgroundCarter, E. (2023) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azac098 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Shang, Y., Wang, K., Tian, Y., Zhou, Y., Ma, B., & Liu, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1087463 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“When individuals are too eager to obtain a reward promised by fraudulent information or to avoid the danger contained in fraudulent information, they ignore obvious clues to fraud in the attention process (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001).”
BackgroundAnalytical reasoning reduces internet fraud susceptibility
Kelley, N. J., Hurley-Wallace, A. L., Warner, K. L., & Hanoch, Y. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107648 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Understanding pet scams: A case study of advance fee and non-delivery fraud using victims’ accounts
Whittaker, J. M., & Button, M. (2020) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/0004865820957077 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“There have been only a few studies that have explored this area (see for example Button et al., 2014; Fischer et al., 2013; Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001; Titus & Gover, 2001; Whitty, 2013, 2015) and the accounts of fraud victims (Button et al., 2014; Cross & Blackshaw, 2015; Cross et al., 2019;…”
BackgroundeWOM Watchdogs: Ego‐Threatening Product Domains and the Policing of Positive Online Reviews
Larson, L. R. L., & Denton, L. T. (2014) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20735 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
In their own words: deception detection by victims and near victims of fraud
Junger, M., Koning, L. F., Hartel, P., & Veldkamp, B. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135369 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“, 2018, Hyslip and Holt, 2019), fraudulent messages and persuasion techniques (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001; Lea et al., 2009; Dolan et al., 2012; Button et al., 2014).”
BackgroundGenerating a Visceral Response
Amos, C., & Spears, N. E. (2010) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367390302 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Mental States: A Key Point in Scam Compliance and Warning Compliance in Real Life
Wen, X., Xu, L., Wang, J., Gao, Y., Shi, J., Zhao, K., Tao, F., & Qian, X. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19148294 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“The vulnerability model, for example, summarized the effect of visceral effects on scam compliance [39].”
BackgroundMethodWhat we do know and don’t know about marketing communications on mature consumers
Yannopoulou, N., Manika, D., Chandrasapth, K., Tajvidi, M., & Wells, V. K. (2023) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-12-2020-0906 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Roy, S., & Sanyal, S. N. (2017) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qmr-11-2016-0113 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Aspara, J., Luo, X., & Dhar, R. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2017.03.002 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“In turn, for consumer psychology literature in general, it may not come as a surprise that intelligence (e.g., Burroughs & Mick, 2004; Capon & Davis, 1984; Hirschman, 1983; Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001) affects consumer decision making.”
Background"Winning and losing": vulnerability to mass marketing fraud
Olivier, S., Burls, T., Fenge, L., & Brown, K. (2015) · The Journal of Adult Protection · doi:10.1108/jap-02-2015-0002 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Other psychologists have suggested a theory of scamming vulnerability (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001) which includes factors such as gullibility and skepticism.”
BackgroundDifferentiating tourist scam cases: Towards a taxonomy of deceptive schemes
Xu, D., Murphy, L., Chen, T.-Z., & Pearce, P. (2022) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.01.011 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Griffiths, M. A. (2014) · doi:10.1362/147539214x14103453768741 · Cited by 18
Risks and Security of Internet and Systems
González-Granadillo, G., Rubio-Hernan, J., & Garcia-alfaro, J. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76687-4 · Cited by 17
Food portions and consumer vulnerability: qualitative insights from older consumers
Ford, N., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019) · Qualitative Market Research · doi:10.1108/qmr-10-2017-0134 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The Effect of Decentralized Behavioral Decision Making on System‐Level Risk
Kaivanto, K. (2014) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12219 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“(12–14) As in legitimate forms of marketing, scams emphasize the urgency of the opportunity or required action.(15) If urgency is taken at face value, then there is not time to contemplate and “think on it” as one would in the direct route to persuasion.”
InfluentialAbroshan, H., Devos, J., Poels, G., & Laermans, E. (2017) · Crisis · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76687-4_13 · Cited by 15
“A victim who has high focus on the scam reward might get hooked by the phishing attack if s/he has low self-control, for example, and a victim who focuses on scam cues might get hooked if s/he has a low attention to the cues, in addition to having a high level of “social isolation”, “cognitive impairment”, “gullibilit…”
BackgroundRobinson, J., & Edwards, M. (2024) · Security Journal · doi:10.1057/s41284-023-00410-4 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“It is also mentioned in other literature surrounding scam susceptibility (Titus and Gover 2001; Langenderfer and Shimp 2001; Fischer et al. 2013).”
A psychological approach to information technology security
Enrici, I., Ancilli, M., & Lioy, A. (2010) · International Conference on Human System Interaction · doi:10.1109/hsi.2010.5514528 · Cited by 14
“Recent experimental works analyzed how different forms of cognitive manipulation are involved in cognitive attacks [ 33-36 ].”
BackgroundComparison shopping on the internet
Klassen, M., Gupta, P. B., & Bunker, M. (2009) · International Journal of Business Information Systems · doi:10.1504/ijbis.2009.025207 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Scams are likely to occur when a situation has asymmetric information, with the consumer lacking knowledge and the scammer knowing the final outcome (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001).”
BackgroundTourist scams: cues and processes in decision-making
Xu, D., Murphy, L., & Chen, T.-Z. (2022) · Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1080/10941665.2023.2174037 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Secondly, the Scam Vulnerability Model by Langenderfer and Shimp (2001), despite a clear picture of information processing through the central route, lacks clarification through the peripheral route.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDoes consumer scepticism negate the effects of visceral cues in weight loss advertising?
Amos, C., & Grau, S. L. (2011) · doi:10.2501/ija-30-4-693-719 · Cited by 12
“Recent research has posited that persuasive-minded individuals (e.g. advertisers, salespeople) employ visceral stimuli to generate rapid-affective responses, thus possibly resulting in an impulsive response (langenderfer & Shimp 2001; Bell et al. 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialUnderstanding the human element in scams: a multidisciplinary approach
Liu, X.-F., Ai, Y.-S., Jiang, L. C., Wang, X.-H., & Wu, Y. (2024) · Journal of IT Cases and Applications · doi:10.1080/15228053.2024.2439192 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Scammers may intensify urgency through storytelling, constructing scenarios that pressure victims to act quickly (Dove, 2018; Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001; Loewenstein, 1996).”
Psychological predictors of online fraud victimhood in China: a machine learning approach
Xu, L., Wen, X., Wang, J., Li, S., Shi, J., & Qian, X.-Y. (2024) · Psychology, Crime & Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2024.2389187 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“These strategies can impair victims’ ability to make rational decisions, thereby increasing their vulnerability to deception (Eisend, 2008; Fischer, Greitemeyer, et al., 2008; Fischer, Schulz-Hardt, et al., 2008; Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001).”
Social Engineering Attacks and Defenses in the Physical World vs. Cyberspace: A Contrast Study
Rodriguez, R. M., Atyabi, A., & Xu, S.-H. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.04813 · Cited by 11
“For example, the ability to reach a wider audience and the low cost of operations facilitate the migration of criminal enterprises from the physical world to cyberspace [88].”
BackgroundInfluentialHarvesting the low-hanging fruits
Halawa, H. H., Beznosov, K., Boshmaf, Y., Coşkun, B., Ripeanu, M., & Santos‐Neto, E. (2016) · New Security Paradigms Workshop · doi:10.1145/3011883.3011885 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Does a differentiated vulnerable population actually exist? Can this vulnerable population be identified? A long stream of past research in offline worlds has shown that users have different likelihoods of making incorrect (security, economic, or health-related) decisions, and more importantly, it suggests that it is…”
BackgroundInvestment scams: the effect of bias-induced gullibility on victimization propensity
Ahmad, Z. (2025) · Crime, law and social change · doi:10.1007/s10611-024-10187-1 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Langenderfer et al. (2001) argued that gullibility is a trait that is often present as a component of scam vulnerability, although it is not necessarily vital.”
In tech we rely: How technology dependence fuels consumer vulnerability
Stewart, K., Perren, R., Chambers, C., & Zulauf, R. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12610 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Wang, F.-Z., Howell, C. J., Maimon, D., & Jacques, S. (2020) · doi:10.21428/cb6ab371.c6eae022 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
A multidimensional framework of web browsers' trust and distrust of banner advertisements
Bunker, M., & Bartholomew, D. (2010) · International Journal of Business Information Systems · doi:10.1504/ijbis.2010.029478 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“The customer’s lack of knowledge regarding internet vendors’ integrity may increase feelings of vulnerability (Langenderfer and Shimp, 2001).”
BackgroundWhitty, M. T. (2025) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2025.2563781 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Because different scam typologies plausibly exploit distinct vulnerabilities (Langenderfer & shimp, 2001; whitty, 2020) future work should explicitly compare predictors across scam types and populations using consistent theory-driven measures. such designs can help distinguish common risk factors…”
Living in a Spamster's Paradise: Deceit and Threats in Phishing Emails
Kikerpill, K., & Siibak, A. (2019) · Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology · doi:10.5817/mujlt2019-1-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Previous analyses have also shown the prevalence of urgency cues(13) and visceral appeals, such as money, love or sorrow, in eliciting compliance from the targets.(14) Vishwanath and others also found that attention to urgency cues is positively related to the potential victim’s likelihood of responding to the fraudul…”
BackgroundPelawi, R., Tandelilin, E., Lantara, I. W. N., & Junarsin, E. (2025) · Journal of Risk and Financial Management · doi:10.3390/jrfm18080425 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Why did I fall for it?” Exploring internet fraud susceptibility in the pig butchering scam
Xie, Z., & Duan, Z. (2024) · Security Journal · doi:10.1057/s41284-024-00457-x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“…cases, when per-petrators vividly describe fictitious rewards in a vivid and tangible manner (for example, implying that they have already benefited from the “investment”) using certain situational factors, victims are more prone to exhibit behaviors of excessive trust (Langenderfer & Shimp 2001).”
Collective action and UK wine investment fraud
Einarsen, K., & Jack, L. (2019) · Qualitative Research in Financial Markets · doi:10.1108/qrfm-11-2018-0126 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Con Men and Their Enablers: The Anatomy of Confidence Games
Orbach, B. Y., & Huang, L. A. (2018) · doi:10.1353/sor.2018.0050 · Cited by 8
“…externalities, namely, harm to third parties that do not participate in the exchange; and (3) economic power and economic desperation sometimes force people into exchanges that they would not choose otherwise (Arrow 1969; Kahneman 2011; Sandel 2012; Konnikova 2016; Langenderfer and Shimp 2001).”
BackgroundTransformative and restorative consumption behaviors following attachment trauma
Caldwell, M., & Henry, P. (2017) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21020 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Olivier, S., Burls, T., Fenge, L., & Brown, K. (2016) · Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law · doi:10.1080/09649069.2016.1161872 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Vulnerability to scams has been linked to overconfidence in one’s financial knowledge and factors such as gullibility and scepticism (Langenderfer & Shimp, 2001).”
BackgroundDeLiema, M., Volker, J., & Worley, A. (2023) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2023.2244468 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“In their model on scam susceptibility, Langenderfer and Shimp (2001) discuss how visceral factors like greed, fear, hunger, and desire can produce heuristic, peripheral processing rather than central processing where persuasion messages are evaluated in deliberative and thoughtful manner.”
BackgroundMany phish in the C$\mathcal{C}$: A coexisting‐choice‐criteria model of security behavior
Embrey, I., & Kaivanto, K. (2022) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13947 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Langenderfer, J., & Shimp, T. A.
- Affiliations
- Berry College (US)
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Langenderfer, Jeff
- Venue
- Psychology & Marketing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05-25
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 763-783
- ISSN
- 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6793
- OpenAlex
- W2026285994
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology and Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- consumer fraud, persuasion, self-control, gullibility, interpersonal influence, con artists, online fraud
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review