Cited by 143Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological disorders and treatmentsNeurological Disorders and Treatments

Randomized, double‐blind, pilot evaluation of intravenous glutathione in Parkinson's disease

Hauser, Robert A., Lyons, Kelly E., McClain, Terry, Carter, Summer, Perlmutter, David·2009·Movement Disorders

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of intravenous glutathione in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. This was a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, pilot trial in subjects with PD whose motor symptoms were not adequately controlled with their current medication regimen. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive intravenous glutathione 1,400 mg or placebo administered three times a week for 4 weeks. Twenty‐one subjects were randomly assigned, 11 to glutathione and 10 to placebo. One subject who was assigned to glutathione withdrew from the study for personal reasons prior to undergoing any postrandomization efficacy assessments. Glutathione was well tolerated and there were no withdrawals because of adverse events in either group. Reported adverse events were similar in the two groups. There were no significant differences in changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores. Over the 4 weeks of study medication administration, UPDRS ADL + motor scores improved by a mean of 2.8 units more in the glutathione group (P = 0.32), and over the subsequent 8 weeks worsened by a mean of 3.5 units more in the glutathione group (P = 0.54). Glutathione was well tolerated and no safety concerns were identified. Preliminary efficacy data suggest the possibility of a mild symptomatic effect, but this remains to be evaluated in a larger study. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.22401

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PD patients with badly controlled motor symptoms intravenously administered 1400 mg glutathione three times a week for four weeks had minor symptomatic improvement and well-tolerated glutathione.

    “In another study, PD patients with badly controlled motor symptoms were intravenously administrated 1400 mg of glutathione three times a week for four weeks. The outcome was a minor symptomatic improvement and well-tolerated glutathione (Hauser et al. 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hauser, R. A., Lyons, K. E., McClain, T., Carter, S., & Perlmutter, D.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Hauser, Robert A.
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05-15
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
979-983
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W1955012509
Cited by
143
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Movement Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, motor symptoms, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, treatment efficacy, drug safety and tolerability, antioxidant therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antiparkinson Agents, Double-Blind Method, Drug Evaluation, Female, Glutathione, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Pilot Projects, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review