Cited by 302Inhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

Nanoparticle formulations in pulmonary drug delivery

Bailey, Mark M., Berkland, Cory J.·2009·Medicinal Research Reviews

Abstract

The advent of nanotechnology has reignited interest in the lungs as a major route of drug delivery for both systemic and local treatments. The large surface area of the lungs and the minimal barriers impeding access to the lung periphery make this organ a suitable portal for a variety of therapeutic interventions. Nanoparticles provide new formulation options for both dispersed liquid droplet dosage forms such as metered dose inhalers and nebulizers, and dry powder formulations. Nanoparticle formulations have many advantages over traditional dosage forms, such as enhanced dissolution properties and the potential for intracellular drug delivery. Specifically, pure drug nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, polyelectrolyte complexes, and drug‐loaded liposomes offer some encouraging results for delivering drugs to and through the lungs. Methods are also being investigated to produce nanoparticles with properties suitable for improving access to the peripheral lung. Traditional techniques such as spray drying and grinding, and more recent advances in supercritical fluid extraction, precipitation, and solvent extraction have been employed to produce nanoparticle formulations for pulmonary delivery. Here, the benefits of nanoparticle formulations and current progress are compared in light of the practical encumbrances of producing formulations, and possible toxicological effects of these materials. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Med Res Rev, 29, No. 1, 196–212, 2009

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/med.20140

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bailey, M. M., & Berkland, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Berkland, Cory J.
Venue
Medicinal Research Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-10-27
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
196-212
ISSN
  • 0198-6325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1128
OpenAlex
W2111564907
Cited by
302
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 20
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicinal Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
pulmonary drug delivery, nanoparticles, dry powder inhaler, nebulizer, polymeric nanoparticles, polyelectrolyte complexes, liposomes, spray drying, supercritical fluid extraction, precipitation chemistry, solvent extraction, intracellular drug delivery, nanoparticle toxicity
MeSH terms
Administration, Inhalation, Animals, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Liposomes, Lung, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Drug Design, Drug Delivery Systems, Nanomedicine, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review