The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phytochemical phenolics in organically grown vegetables
Abstract
Fruit and vegetable intake is inversely correlated with risks for several chronic diseases in humans. Phytochemicals, and in particular, phenolic compounds, present in plant foods may be partly responsible for these health benefits through a variety of mechanisms. Since environmental factors play a role in a plant's production of secondary metabolites, it was hypothesized that an organic agricultural production system would increase phenolic levels. Cultivars of leaf lettuce, collards, and pac choi were grown either on organically certified plots or on adjacent conventional plots. Nine prominent phenolic agents were quantified by HPLC, including phenolic acids (e. g. caffeic acid and gallic acid) and aglycone or glycoside flavonoids (e. g. apigenin, kaempferol, luteolin, and quercetin). Statistically, we did not find significant higher levels of phenolic agents in lettuce and collard samples grown organically. The total phenolic content of organic pac choi samples as measured by the Folin-Ciocalteu assay, however, was significantly higher than conventional samples (p < 0.01), and seemed to be associated with a greater attack the plants in organic plots by flea beetles. These results indicated that although organic production method alone did not enhance biosynthesis of phytochemicals in lettuce and collards, the organic system provided an increased opportunity for insect attack, resulting in a higher level of total phenolic agents in pac choi.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. I. Epidemiology
Steinmetz, K. A., & Potter, J. D. (1991) · Cancer Causes and Control · doi:10.1007/bf00051672 · Cited by 1,118
Magnusson, M. K., Arvola, A., Hursti, U.-K. K., Åberg, L., & Sjödén, P.-O. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00002-3 · Cited by 941
Cited by
Are Organic Foods Safer or Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives?: A Systematic Review
Smith-Spangler, C., Brandeau, M. L., Hunter, G. E., Bavinger, J. C., Pearson, M., Eschbach, P. J., Sundaram, V., Liu, H., Schirmer, P., Stave, C., et al. (2012) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00007 · Cited by 602
Winter, C. K., & Davis, S. F. (2006) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00196.x · Cited by 435
Brandt, K., Leifert, C., Sanderson, R., & Seal, C. J. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2011.554417 · Cited by 253
Contribution of Organically Grown Crops to Human Health
Johansson, E., Hussain, A., Kuktaite, R., Andersson, S., & Olsson, M. (2014) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph110403870 · Cited by 122
Effects of agricultural production systems and their components on protein profiles of potato tubers
Lehesranta, S. J., Koistinen, K. M., Massat, N., Davies, H. V., Shepherd, L. V. T., McNicol, J. W., Cakmak, I., Cooper, J., Lück, L., Kärenlampi, S. O., et al. (2007) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200600889 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, J. E., Zhao, X., Carey, E. E., Welti, R., Yang, S.-S., & Wang, W.
- Venue
- Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1136-1142
- ISSN
- 1613-4125 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4133
- OpenAlex
- W2126966202
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytochemical phenolics in organically grown vegetables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mnfr.200500080
- The paper
- Young, J. E., Zhao, X., Carey, E. E., Welti, R., Yang, S.-S., & Wang, W. (2005). Phytochemical phenolics in organically grown vegetables. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200500080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.