Arterial spin labeling perfusion fMRI with very low task frequency
Open accessAbstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become the most widely used modality for visualizing regional brain activation in response to sensorimotor or cognitive tasks. While the majority of fMRI studies have used blood oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) contrast as a marker for neural activation, baseline drift effects result in poor sensitivity for detecting slow variations in neural activity. By contrast, drift effects are minimized in arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion contrast, primarily as a result of successive pairwise subtraction between images acquired with and without labeling. Recent data suggest that ASL contrast shows stable noise characteristics over the entire frequency spectrum, which makes it suitable for studying low‐frequency events in brain function. The present study investigates the relative sensitivities of ASL and BOLD contrast in detecting changes in motor cortex activation over a spectrum of frequencies of experimental design, where the alternating period between the resting state and activation is varied from 30 s up to 24 hr. The results demonstrate that 1) ASL contrast can detect differences in motor cortex activation over periods of minutes, hours, and even days; 2) the functional sensitivity of ASL contrast becomes superior to that of BOLD contrast when the alternating period between the resting state and activation is greater than a few minutes; and 3) task activation measured by ASL tends to have less intersubject variability than BOLD contrast. The improved sensitivity of the ASL contrast for low task frequency and longitudinal studies, along with its superior power in group analysis, is expected to extend the range of experimental designs that can be studied using fMRI. Magn Reson Med 49:796–802, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When compared with BOLD, ASL fMRI can reliably assess rostral neural regions, such as the OFC, a brain area repeatedly implicated in mindfulness meditation but suffering from substantial susceptibility artifacts.
“Furthermore, when compared with BOLD, ASL fMRI can reliably assess rostral neural regions, such as the OFC,126 a brain area repeatedly implicated in mindfulness meditation,135,141 but suffering from substantial susceptibility artifacts.”
From The neural mechanisms of mindfulness-based pain relief: a functional magnetic resonance imaging-based review and primer (2019) · cites this paper as [126]
When compared with BOLD fMRI, ASL is less sensitive to low-frequency drifts in signal intensity that can occur as an individual's body relaxes as a function of time or as the scanner heats up over the course of an imaging series.
“When compared with BOLD fMRI, ASL is less sensitive to low-frequency drifts in signal intensity that can occur as an individual's body relaxes as a function of time or as the scanner heats up over the course of an imaging series.126”
From The neural mechanisms of mindfulness-based pain relief: a functional magnetic resonance imaging-based review and primer (2019) · cites this paper as [126]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Thulborn, K. R., Waterton, J. C., Matthews, P. M., & Radda, G. K. (1982) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/0304-4165(82)90333-6 · Cited by 1,134 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurocognitive consequences of sleep deprivation
Goel, N., Rao, H., Durmer, J., & Dinges, D. (2009) · Seminars in Neurology · doi:10.1055/s-0029-1237117 · Cited by 2,154 · see citing works
Brain Mechanisms Supporting the Modulation of Pain by Mindfulness Meditation
Zeidan, F., Martucci, K. T., Kraft, R. A., Gordon, N. S., McHaffie, J. G., & Coghill, R. C. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5791-10.2011 · Cited by 640 · see citing works
Perfusion functional MRI reveals cerebral blood flow pattern under psychological stress
Wang, J., Rao, H., Wetmore, G. S., Furlan, P. M., Korczykowski, M., Dinges, D. F., & Detre, J. A. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503082102 · Cited by 513 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural substrates of abstinence-induced cigarette cravings in chronic smokers
Wang, Z., Faith, M., Patterson, F., Tang, K., Kerrin, K., Wileyto, E. P., Detre, J. A., & Lerman, C. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2966-07.2007 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Self-citationZeidan, F., Baumgartner, J. N., & Coghill, R. C. (2019) · PAIN Reports · doi:10.1097/pr9.0000000000000759 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Focusing neurovisceral integration: Cognition, heart rate variability, and cerebral blood flow
Jennings, J. R., Allen, B., Gianaros, P. J., Thayer, J. F., & Manuck, S. B. (2015) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12319 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Neural effects of short-term training on working memory
Buschkuehl, M., Hernandez-Garcia, L., Jaeggi, S. M., Bernard, J. A., & Jonides, J. (2014) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-013-0244-9 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Pfefferbaum, A., Chanraud, S., Pitel, A.-L., Muller-Oehring, E., Shankaranarayanan, A., Alsop, D. C., Rohlfing, T., & Sullivan, E. V. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq090 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Michalon, A., Bruns, A., Risterucci, C., Honer, M., Ballard, T. M., Ozmen, L., Jaeschke, G., Wettstein, J. G., von Kienlin, M., Künnecke, B., et al. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.038 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
The future of functionally-related structural change assessment
Johansen-Berg, H. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.073 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, J., Aguirre, G. K., Kimberg, D. Y., Roc, A. C., Li, L., & Detre, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Jiongjiong
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-04-15
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 796-802
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2133875665
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-015149, R01DA015149)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD039621, HD 39621)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- arterial spin labeling, perfusion MRI, BOLD contrast, motor cortex activation, baseline drift, functional sensitivity, interindividual variability, longitudinal neuroimaging
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Fingers, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Cortex, Motor Neurons, Perfusion, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spin Labels, Time Factors, Evoked Potentials, Motor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review