Cited by 316Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Arterial spin labeling perfusion fMRI with very low task frequency

Open access
Wang, Jiongjiong, Aguirre, Geoffrey K., Kimberg, Daniel Y., Roc, Anne C., Li, Lin, Detre, John A.·2003·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become the most widely used modality for visualizing regional brain activation in response to sensorimotor or cognitive tasks. While the majority of fMRI studies have used blood oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) contrast as a marker for neural activation, baseline drift effects result in poor sensitivity for detecting slow variations in neural activity. By contrast, drift effects are minimized in arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion contrast, primarily as a result of successive pairwise subtraction between images acquired with and without labeling. Recent data suggest that ASL contrast shows stable noise characteristics over the entire frequency spectrum, which makes it suitable for studying low‐frequency events in brain function. The present study investigates the relative sensitivities of ASL and BOLD contrast in detecting changes in motor cortex activation over a spectrum of frequencies of experimental design, where the alternating period between the resting state and activation is varied from 30 s up to 24 hr. The results demonstrate that 1) ASL contrast can detect differences in motor cortex activation over periods of minutes, hours, and even days; 2) the functional sensitivity of ASL contrast becomes superior to that of BOLD contrast when the alternating period between the resting state and activation is greater than a few minutes; and 3) task activation measured by ASL tends to have less intersubject variability than BOLD contrast. The improved sensitivity of the ASL contrast for low task frequency and longitudinal studies, along with its superior power in group analysis, is expected to extend the range of experimental designs that can be studied using fMRI. Magn Reson Med 49:796–802, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.10437

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When compared with BOLD, ASL fMRI can reliably assess rostral neural regions, such as the OFC, a brain area repeatedly implicated in mindfulness meditation but suffering from substantial susceptibility artifacts.

    “Furthermore, when compared with BOLD, ASL fMRI can reliably assess rostral neural regions, such as the OFC,126 a brain area repeatedly implicated in mindfulness meditation,135,141 but suffering from substantial susceptibility artifacts.”
  • When compared with BOLD fMRI, ASL is less sensitive to low-frequency drifts in signal intensity that can occur as an individual's body relaxes as a function of time or as the scanner heats up over the course of an imaging series.

    “When compared with BOLD fMRI, ASL is less sensitive to low-frequency drifts in signal intensity that can occur as an individual's body relaxes as a function of time or as the scanner heats up over the course of an imaging series.126”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Aguirre, G. K., Kimberg, D. Y., Roc, A. C., Li, L., & Detre, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Jiongjiong
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04-15
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
796-802
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2133875665
Cited by
316
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 33
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-015149, R01DA015149)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD039621, HD 39621)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
arterial spin labeling, perfusion MRI, BOLD contrast, motor cortex activation, baseline drift, functional sensitivity, interindividual variability, longitudinal neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Fingers, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Cortex, Motor Neurons, Perfusion, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spin Labels, Time Factors, Evoked Potentials, Motor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review