Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MR Contrast Due to Microscopically Heterogeneous Magnetic Susceptibility: Numerical Simulations and Applications to Cerebral Physiology

Fisel, C. Richard, Ackerman, Jerome L., Buxton, Richard B., Garrido, Leoncio, Belliveau, John W., Rosen, Bruce R., Brady, Thomas J.·1991·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

We calculate the effects of subvoxel variations in magnetic susceptibility on MR image intensity for spin‐echo (SE) and gradient‐echo (GE) experiments for a range of microscopic physical parameters. The model used neglects the overlap of gradients from one magnetic inclusion to the next, and so is valid for low volume fractions and weak perturbations of the magnetic field. Transverse relaxation is predicted to deviate significantly from linear exponential decay in both SE and GE at a particle radius of 2.5 μm. Calculated changes in transverse relaxation rates for SE and GE increase linearly with volume fraction of high‐susceptibility regions of 5 μm diameter, but increase with about the 3/2 power of volume fraction of regions with 15 μm spacing between centers. This sensitivity to the actual size and spacing of magnetized regions may allow them to be measured on the basis of contrast, without being resolved in images. GE and SE decay rates are approximately twice as sensitive to long cylinders of 5 μm diameter than to spheres of the same size, for diffusion constants of 2.5 μm 2/ms. Calculated changes in transverse decay rates increase with approximately the square of field and susceptibility variation for 5‐μm spheres and a diffusion constant of 2.5 μm 2/ms. This exponent is smaller for cylindrical magnetized regions of the same size, and also depends on the diffusion constant. We discuss possible applications of our theoretical results to the analysis of the effects of high‐susceptibility contrast agents in brain. Experimental data from the literature are compared with calculated signal changes according to the model. The monotonic dependence of decay rates on the volume of distribution of the contrast agent suggests that cerebral blood volume and flow could be measured using MR contrast. © 1991 Academic Press, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.1910170206

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Fisel, C. R., Ackerman, J. L., Buxton, R. B., Garrido, L., Belliveau, J. W., Rosen, B. R., & Brady, T. J.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-02
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
336-347
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2011575415
Cited by
356
References
1
FWCI
19.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MR Contrast Due to Microscopically Heterogeneous Magnetic Susceptibility: Numerical Simulations and Applications to Cerebral Physiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910170206
The paper
Fisel, C. R., Ackerman, J. L., Buxton, R. B., Garrido, L., Belliveau, J. W., Rosen, B. R., & Brady, T. J. (1991). MR Contrast Due to Microscopically Heterogeneous Magnetic Susceptibility: Numerical Simulations and Applications to Cerebral Physiology. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910170206

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.