Cited by 411Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Disease state prediction from resting state functional connectivity

Open access
Craddock, R. Cameron, Holtzheimer, Paul E., Hu, Xiaoping P., Mayberg, Helen S.·2009·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

The application of multivoxel pattern analysis methods has attracted increasing attention, particularly for brain state prediction and real‐time functional MRI applications. Support vector classification is the most popular of these techniques, owing to reports that it has better prediction accuracy and is less sensitive to noise. Support vector classification was applied to learn functional connectivity patterns that distinguish patients with depression from healthy volunteers. In addition, two feature selection algorithms were implemented (one filter method, one wrapper method) that incorporate reliability information into the feature selection process. These reliability feature selections methods were compared to two previously proposed feature selection methods. A support vector classifier was trained that reliably distinguishes healthy volunteers from clinically depressed patients. The reliability feature selection methods outperformed previously utilized methods. The proposed framework for applying support vector classification to functional connectivity data is applicable to other disease states beyond major depression. Magn Reson Med, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.22159

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several recent brain imaging studies have tried to distinguish depressed patients from healthy controls.

    “Recently, several brain imaging studies have attempted to distinguish depressed patients from healthy controls (Fu et al., 2008;Costafreda et al., 2009;Craddock et al., 2009).”
  • This kind of analysis has previously been used to predict subjects' psychiatric condition and cognitive state.

    “This kind of analysis has previously been used (albeit from full correlation network matrices) to predict subjects’ psychiatric condition [77] and cognitive state [78];”

    From Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI (2013) · cites this paper as [77]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [36]Cox RW Hyde JS Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI data NMR in biomedicine 1997 10 4-5 171 178 9430344
  2. [39]Le TH Hu X Methods for assessing accuracy and reliability in functional MRI NMR in biomedicine 1997 10 4-5 160 164 9430342

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craddock, R. C., Holtzheimer, P. E., Hu, X. P., & Mayberg, H. S.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Craddock, R. Cameron
  • Hu, Xiaoping P.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-26
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
1619-1628
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2013016035
Cited by
411
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 32
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Emory University
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH073719, P50MH077083, NIMH P50)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB002009)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
resting-state functional connectivity, depression, support vector machine classification, feature selection, filter and wrapper methods, multi-voxel pattern analysis, brain state classification
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review