Cited by 233Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Learning and comparing functional connectomes across subjects

Open access
Varoquaux, Gaël, Craddock, R. Cameron·2013·NeuroImage

Abstract

Functional connectomes capture brain interactions via synchronized fluctuations in the functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. If measured during rest, they map the intrinsic functional architecture of the brain. With task-driven experiments they represent integration mechanisms between specialized brain areas. Analyzing their variability across subjects and conditions can reveal markers of brain pathologies and mechanisms underlying cognition. Methods of estimating functional connectomes from the imaging signal have undergone rapid developments and the literature is full of diverse strategies for comparing them. This review aims to clarify links across functional-connectivity methods as well as to expose different steps to perform a group study of functional connectomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.007

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [61][61] S. Lauritzen, Graphical models, Oxford University Press, USA, 1996. -
  2. [73][73] A. McIntosh, Moving between functional and effective connectivity, in: O. Sporns (Ed.), Analysis and Function of LargeScale Brain Networks, Society for Neuroscience, 2010, p. 15. -
  3. [114][114] G. Varoquaux, F. Baronnet, A. Kleinschmidt, P. Fillard, B. Thirion, Detection of brain functional-connectivity difference in post-stroke patients using group-level covariance modeling, in: MICCAI, 2010. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varoquaux, G., & Craddock, R. C.
Affiliations
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
80
Pages
405-415
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011650426
Cited by
233
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 10
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • NiConnect grant
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (DEQ20100318254)
  • NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
functional connectome, functional connectivity estimation, interindividual variability, resting-state fMRI
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Humans, Models, Anatomic, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review