Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AKT activation predicts outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen

Kirkegaard, Tove, Witton, Caroline J, McGlynn, Liane M, Tovey, Sian M, Dunne, Barbara, Lyon, Alison, Bartlett, John MS·2005·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

Oestrogen receptor (ERα) expression is a strong predictor of response to endocrine therapy. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signal transduction pathway has been implicated in endocrine resistance in vitro. The present study was carried out to test the hypothesis that AKT activation mediates tamoxifen resistance in clinical breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) using AKT1‐3, pan‐AKT, pAKT (Thr‐308), pAKT (Ser‐473), pER (Ser‐167), and pHER2 antibodies was performed on 402 ERα‐positive breast carcinomas from patients treated with tamoxifen. High pAKT (Ser‐473) activity (p = 0.0406) and low AKT2 expression (p = 0.0115) alone, or in combination [high pAKT (Ser‐473)/low AKT2; ‘high‐risk’ patient group] (p = 0.0014), predicted decreased overall survival in tamoxifen‐treated patients with ERα‐positive breast cancers. There was no significant association between tumour levels of AKT expression or activity and disease‐free survival (DFS); however, the ‘high‐risk’ patient group was significantly more likely to relapse (p = 0.0491). During tamoxifen treatment, neither AKT2 nor pAKT predicted DFS. Finally, activation of AKT, via phosphorylation, was linked to activation of both HER2 and ERα in this patient cohort. The data presented here show that the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is associated with relapse and death in ERα‐positive breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen, supporting in vitro evidence that AKT mediates tamoxifen resistance. Patients with a ‘high‐risk’ expression profile were at increased risk of death (hazard ratio 3.22, p = 0.002) relative to ‘low‐risk’ patients, highlighting the potential that tumour profiling, with multiple IHC markers predictive of therapeutic response, may improve patient selection for endocrine therapies, eg tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor‐based treatments. Copyright © 2005 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.1829

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Kirkegaard, T., Witton, C. J., McGlynn, L. M., Tovey, S. M., Dunne, B., Lyon, A., & Bartlett, J. M.
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-09
Volume
207
Issue
2
Pages
139-146
ISSN
  • 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9896
OpenAlex
W1985453548
Cited by
268
References
56
FWCI
8.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.