Cited by 29Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Rising High or Falling Deep? Pathways of Self–Esteem in a Representative German Sample

Open access
Mund, Marcus, Neyer, Franz J.·2016·European Journal of Personality

Abstract

In many longitudinal studies, self–esteem has been shown to increase up until around age 50 or 60 and to decrease thereafter. These studies have also found substantial inter–individual differences in the intra–individual development of self–esteem. In the current study, we examined whether this variation in change could be attributed to underlying latent classes of individuals following different trajectories of self–esteem development over time. By applying general growth mixture modelling to data from the representative German pairfam study (N = 12 377), four latent classes of self–esteem development across five years were extracted. Based on their mean levels, trajectories, and variability, individuals in the latent classes could be described as having (a) constant and stable high self–esteem (29.00% of the sample), (b) constant but variable moderate self–esteem (31.69%), (c) increasing and stabilizing self–esteem (15.13%), and (d) decreasing and variable self–esteem (24.18%). Furthermore, these latent classes differed in accordance with findings of prior research on self–rated, partner–rated, and objective correlates of the domains of health and well–being, partner relationships, and occupational status. Thus, the current study shows that inter–individual variation in intra–individual change in self–esteem is not random but reflects specific individual trajectories, or pathways, of self–esteem. Copyright © 2016 European Association of Personality Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/per.2063

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals seem to experience changes in self-esteem during life events for multiple, idiosyncratic reasons.

    “Instead, individuals seem to experience changes in self-esteem during life events for multiple, idiosyncratic reasons (Jayawickreme et al., 2021;Mund & Neyer, 2016;Reitz et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mund, M., & Neyer, F. J.
Affiliations
Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Corresponding author
Mund, Marcus
Venue
European Journal of Personality
Published
2016-07
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
341-357
ISSN
  • 0890-2070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0984
OpenAlex
W2514960674
Cited by
29
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
self-esteem, life course development, latent classes, within-person change, individual differences, self-rated health, well-being, couple relationships, occupational status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review