Cited by 123Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

The Long-Term Stability of Self-Esteem: Its Time-Dependent Decay and Nonzero Asymptote

Kuster, Farah, Orth, Ulrich·2013·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

How stable are individual differences in self-esteem? We examined the time-dependent decay of rank-order stability of self-esteem and tested whether stability asymptotically approaches zero or a nonzero value across long test-retest intervals. Analyses were based on 6 assessments across a 29-year period of a sample of 3,180 individuals aged 14 to 102 years. The results indicated that, as test-retest intervals increased, stability exponentially decayed and asymptotically approached a nonzero value (estimated as .43). The exponential decay function explained a large proportion of variance in observed stability coefficients, provided a better fit than alternative functions, and held across gender and for all age groups from adolescence to old age. Moreover, structural equation modeling of the individual-level data suggested that a perfectly stable trait component underlies stability of self-esteem. The findings suggest that the stability of self-esteem is relatively large, even across very long periods, and that self-esteem is a trait-like characteristic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167213480189

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-esteem rank-order stability increases from lowest in childhood and adolescence to highest in middle age.

    “The stability of individual differences in self-esteem was found to increase from the lowest stability in childhood and adolescence to the highest stability in middle age (Donnellan et al., 2012;Kuster & Orth, 2013;Trzesniewski et al., 2003).”
  • Self-esteem rank-order stability declines with increasing time intervals from 0.93 for 1-year to 0.61 for 10-year intervals and levels off at an asymptote of 0.4.

    “Another study reported relatively high rank-order stability that declined with increasing time intervals from 0.93 for 1-year to 0.61 for 10-year intervals and leveled off at an asymptote at a value of 0.4 (Kuster & Orth, 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuster, F., & Orth, U.
Affiliations
University of Basel (CH)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2013-03-10
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
677-690
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2168624465
Cited by
117
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
self-esteem, trait stability, rank-order stability, test-retest reliability, long-term stability, exponential decay, asymptotic stability, individual differences, personality traits, aging, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Individuality, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Self Concept, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review