Cited by 33Polymer composites and self-healingAdvanced Materials and MechanicsPolymer crystallization and properties

Shape memory segmented polyurethanes: dependence of behavior on nanocellulose addition and testing conditions

Auad, María L, Richardson, Tara, Hicks, Marisa, Mosiewicki, Mirna A, Aranguren, Mirta I, Marcovich, Norma E·2012·Polymer International

Abstract

The response of synthesized shape memory segmented polyurethanes (PUs) was affected by the addition of cellulose nanocrystals, as well as by the various conditions selected to carry out thermomechanical cyclic tests. The PUs were synthesized from an α‐hydro‐ω‐hydroxy‐poly(ethylene oxide), tolylene‐2,4‐diisocyanate and 1,4‐butanediol as chain extender. Nanocomposites were prepared by mixing a suspension of cellulose nanocrystals in N,N‐dimethylformamide with the thermoplastic PU dissolved in the same organic solvent. The thermal properties of the neat PU and resulting composites were examined using differential scanning calorimetry. It was found that cellulose addition increases the PU soft segment melting and crystallization temperatures and the degree of crystallinity of this phase. Shape memory behavior was studied using cyclic thermal tensile tests. Both neat PU and composites exhibit shape memory properties, with fixity and recovery values that depend on heating temperature, imposed deformation, deformation rate and nanofiller addition. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pi.3193

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A small amount of well-dispersed cellulose nanowhiskers remarkably improved the stiffness of shape memory polymer, while no obvious decrease in shape memory properties was observed.

    “A small amount of well-dispersed cellulose nanowhiskers remarkably improved the stiffness of SMP, while no obvious decrease in shape memory properties was observed.”
  • A small amount of well-dispersed cellulose nanowhiskers remarkably improved the stiffness of SMP, while no obvious decrease in shape memory properties was observed.

    “A small amount of well-dispersed cellulose nanowhiskers remarkably improved the stiffness of SMP, while no obvious decrease in shape memory properties was observed.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auad, M. L., Richardson, T., Hicks, M., Mosiewicki, M. A., Aranguren, M. I., & Marcovich, N. E.
Affiliations
  • Auburn University (US)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Marcovich, Norma E
Venue
Polymer International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-17
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
321-327
ISSN
  • 0959-8103 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0126
OpenAlex
W2135671823
Cited by
33
References
40
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Polymer International (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Commerce
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
  • Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
Keywords
shape memory polymers, segmented polyurethanes, cellulose nanocrystals, nanocomposites, soft segment crystallization, crystallinity, strain rate, thermomechanical behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review