CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 116Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPalliative and Oncologic CareCancer survivorship and care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Negative religious coping as a correlate of suicidal ideation in patients with advanced cancer: Religious coping and suicidal ideation in cancer patients

Open access
Trevino, K. M., Balboni, M., Zollfrank, A., Balboni, T., Prigerson, H. G.·2014·Psycho-Oncology
DOI 10.1002/pon.3505PMC PMC4776639
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between negative religious coping (NRC) and suicidal ideation in patients with advanced cancer, controlling for demographic and disease characteristics and risk and protective factors for suicidal ideation. METHODS: Adult patients with advanced cancer (life expectancy ≤6 months) were recruited from seven medical centers in the northeastern and southwestern USA (n = 603). Trained raters verbally administered the examined measures to patients upon study entry. Multivariable logistic regression analyses regressed suicidal ideation on NRC controlling for significant demographic, disease, risk, and protective factors. RESULTS: Negative religious coping was associated with an increased risk for suicidal ideation (OR, 2.65 [95% CI, 1.22, 5.74], p = 0.01) after controlling for demographic and disease characteristics, mental and physical health, self-efficacy, secular coping, social support, spiritual care received, global religiousness and spirituality, and positive religious coping. CONCLUSIONS: Negative religious coping is a robust correlate of suicidal ideation. Assessment of NRC in patients with advanced cancer may identify patients experiencing spiritual distress and those at risk for suicidal ideation. Confirmation of these results in future studies would suggest the need for interventions targeting the reduction of NRC to reduce suicidal ideation among advanced cancer patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3505

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First, 1995, Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis I Disorders - Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 116

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Trevino, K. M., Balboni, M., Zollfrank, A., Balboni, T., & Prigerson, H. G.
Affiliations
  • Rowan University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Prigerson, H. G.
ORCID
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-27
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
936-945
ISSN
1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1002/pon.3505
PMC
PMC4776639
OpenAlex
W1817643621
Cited by
116
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (MH63892; CA106370)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
negative religious coping, suicidal ideation, advanced cancer, spiritual distress, end-of-life care, spiritual care, social support, self-efficacy, risk and protective factors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Religion and Psychology, Social Support, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Spirituality, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review