Cited by 391Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

Religious Coping is Associated with the Quality of Life of Patients with Advanced Cancer

Open access
Tarakeshwar, Nalini, Vanderwerker, Lauren C., Paulk, Elizabeth, Pearce, Michelle J., Kasl, Stanislav V., Prigerson, Holly G.·2006·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients confronting a life-threatening illness such as advanced cancer, religious coping can be an important factor influencing their quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVE: The study's main purpose was to examine the association between religious coping and QOL among 170 patients with advanced cancer. Both positive religious coping (e.g., benevolent religious appraisals) and negative religious coping (e.g., anger at God) and multiple dimensions of QOL (physical, physical symptom, psychological, existential, and support) were studied. DESIGN: Structured interviews were conducted with 170 patients recruited as part of an ongoing multi-institutional longitudinal evaluation of the prevalence of mental illness and patterns of mental health service utilization in advanced cancer patients and their primary informal caregivers. MEASUREMENTS: Patients completed measures of QOL (McGill QOL questionnaire), religious coping (Brief Measure of Religious Coping [RCOPE] and Multidimensional Measure of Religion/ Spirituality), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale), and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: Linear regression analyses revealed that after controlling for sociodemographic variables, lifetime history of depression and self-efficacy, greater use of positive religious coping was associated with better overall QOL as well as higher scores on the existential and support QOL dimensions. Greater use of positive religious coping was also related to more physical symptoms. In contrast, greater use of negative religious coping was related to poorer overall QOL and lower scores on the existential and psychological QOL dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Findings show that religious coping plays an important role for the QOL of patients and the types of religious coping strategies used are related to better or poorer QOL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.646

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies suggest PRC is associated with better emotional, interpersonal, and global functioning, better overall quality of life, and greater growth.

    “Many studies suggest that PRC is associated with better emotional, interpersonal, and global functioning (Agarwal et al., 2010; Gall, 2004), better overall quality of life (Tarakeshwar et al., 2006), and greater growth (Urcuyo et al., 2005).”
  • PRC has also been associated with greater transplant concerns in multiple myeloma patients and more physical symptoms in advanced cancer patients.

    “However, PRC has also been associated with greater transplant concerns in multiple myeloma patients (Sherman et al., 2009) and more physical symptoms in advanced cancer patients (Tarakeshwar et al., 2006).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [10]Lazarus R, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  2. [32]Pearce MJ. Religious Coping and Belief Systems Associated with the Well Being and Experience of Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients [dissertation] New Haven, CT: Yale University; Dec 7, Dec 7, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. [35]Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio Causal and Control Beliefs. Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON; 1995. pp. 35–37. [Google Scholar]
  4. [43]McIntosh DN, Spilka B. Religion and physical health: The role of personal faith and control beliefs. In: Lynn ML, Moberg DO, editors. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion. Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1990. pp. 167–194. [Google Scholar]
  5. [49]Tarakeshwar N, Stanton J, Pargament KI. Religion: An overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2003;34:377–394. [Google Scholar]
  6. [51]Scott RO. Are you religious or are you spiritual: A look in the mirror. Spirituality Health. 2001 Spring;:26–28. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tarakeshwar, N., Vanderwerker, L. C., Paulk, E., Pearce, M. J., Kasl, S. V., & Prigerson, H. G.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2006-06
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
646-657
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W2026353303
Cited by
391
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 28
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Fetzer Institute
  • Open Society Institute
  • Yale Cancer Center
  • National Institutes of Health (5k01tw007136-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30 AG21342, P30AG021342)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH056529, MH-56529, MH-63892, R01MH063892)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA106370, CA106370)
  • Fogarty International Center (K01 TW007136-01, K01 TW007136)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
religious coping, quality of life, advanced cancer, positive religious coping, negative religious coping, self-efficacy, depression, somatic symptoms, psychological quality of life, spiritual well-being
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review