Cited by 136Treatment of Major DepressionPsychological Treatments and DisordersMental Health Treatment and Access

Depressive disorders: treatment failures and poor prognosis over the last 50 years

Open access
Blackburn, Thomas P.·2019·Pharmacology Research & Perspectives

Abstract

Depression like many diseases is pleiotropic but unlike cancer and Alzheimer's disease for example, is still largely stigmatized and falls into the dark shadows of human illness. The failure of depression to be in the spotlight for successful treatment options is inherent in the complexity of the disease(s), flawed clinical diagnosis, overgeneralization of the illness, inadequate and biased clinical trial design, restrictive and biased inclusion/exclusion criteria, lack of approved/robust biomarkers, expensive imaging technology along with few advances in neurobiological hypotheses in decades. Clinical trial studies summitted to the regulatory agencies ( FDA / EMA ) for approval, have continually failed to show significant differences between active and placebo. For decades, we have acknowledged this failure, despite vigorous debated by all stakeholders to provide adequate answers to this escalating problem, with only a few new antidepressants approved in the last 20 years with equivocal efficacy, little improvement in side effects or onset of efficacy. It is also clear that funding and initiatives for mental illness lags far behind other life‐treating diseases. Thus, it is no surprise we have not achieved much success in the last 50 years in treating depression, but we are accountable for the many failures and suboptimal treatment. This review will therefore critically address where we have failed and how future advances in medical science offers a glimmer of light for the patient and aid our future understanding of the neurobiology and pathophysiology of the disease, enabling transformative therapies for the treatment of depressive disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prp2.472

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent systematic review and meta-analysis indicates reduced risk of relapse and recurrence in patients remitted from a depressive episode when psychotherapy is sequentially integrated with antidepressant medication.

    “The results of a recent systematic review and meta-analysis indicate reduced risk of relapse and recurrence in patients remitted from a depressive episode when psychotherapy is sequentially integrated with antidepressant medication. 554”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [95]Whalley K. Biomarker discovery. Nature Reviews. Neurosciences. 2012; 13: 361.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blackburn, T. P.
Affiliations
TPBioVentures Hoboken New Jersey USA
Corresponding author
Blackburn, Thomas P.
Venue
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-03
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
e00472-e00472
ISSN
2052-1707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943320709
Cited by
136
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacology Research & Perspectives (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depressive disorders, antidepressant treatment failure, antidepressant efficacy, placebo response, biomarkers, neurobiology of depression, depression pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Clinical Trials as Topic, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Prognosis, Treatment Failure, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review