Cited by 298Saffron Plant Research StudiesMedicinal Plant Extracts EffectsMedicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds

Crocus sativus L. in the treatment of mild to moderate depression: a double‐blind, randomized and placebo‐controlled trial

Akhondzadeh, Shahin, Tahmacebi‐Pour, Najaf, Noorbala, Ahamad‐Ali, Amini, Homayoun, Fallah‐Pour, Hassan, Jamshidi, Amir‐Hossein, Khani, Mousa·2005·Phytotherapy Research

Abstract

Depression is a serious disorder in today's society, with estimates of lifetime prevalence as high as 21% of the general population in some developed countries. As a therapeutic plant, saffron is considered excellent for stomach ailments and as an antispasmodic, to help digestion and to increase appetite. It is also used for depression in Persian traditional medicine. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of the stigmas of Crocus sativus (saffron) in the treatment of mild to moderate depression in a 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled and randomized trial. Forty adult outpatients who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition for major depression based on the structured clinical interview for DSM IV participated in the trial. Patients had a baseline Hamilton rating scale for depression score of at least 18. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre and randomized trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive a capsule of saffron 30 mg[sol ]day (BD) (Group 1) or a capsule of placebo (BD) (Group 2) for a 6-week study. At 6 weeks, Crocus sativus produced a significantly better outcome on the Hamilton depression rating scale than the placebo (d.f. = 1, F = 18.89, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the two groups in terms of the observed side effects. The results of this study indicate the efficacy of Crocus sativus in the treatment of mild to moderate depression. A large-scale trial is justified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ptr.1647

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akhondzadeh, S., Tahmacebi‐Pour, N., Noorbala, A., Amini, H., Fallah‐Pour, H., Jamshidi, A., & Khani, M.
Affiliations
Roozbeh Hospital (IR)
Corresponding author
Akhondzadeh, Shahin
Venue
Phytotherapy Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
148-151
ISSN
  • 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1573
OpenAlex
W1988632498
Cited by
298
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phytotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Saffron Plant Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
Keywords
saffron, depression, mild to moderate depression, herbal medicine, antidepressant efficacy, Persian medicine, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Phytotherapy, Plant Extracts, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Crocus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review