CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Empowering leadership and job crafting: The role of employee optimism

Thun, Sylvi, Bakker, Arnold B.·2018·Stress and Health
DOI 10.1002/smi.2818
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the relationship between empowering leadership and job crafting and to examine the moderating role of optimism as a personal resource. We hypothesized that the association between empowering leadership and job crafting would be stronger for employees with high (vs. low) levels of optimism. A total of 331 Norwegian workers from a variety of occupations participated in our study. Results of structural equation modelling analysis generally supported our hypotheses. Empowering leadership was positively related to 3 of the 4 job crafting strategies investigated (increasing structural job resources, increasing social job resources, and increasing challenging job demands; but not reducing hindrance job demands). Moreover, as hypothesized, optimism strengthened the empowering leadership–job crafting relationship for increasing structural resources and increasing challenging demands. The results suggest that empowering leadership is an important antecedent of job crafting strategies, except for reducing hindrance demands. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smi.2818

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.002 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell019 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.008 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0018726712453471 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/1467-8721.00064 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/joop.12089 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/per.481 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.02.018 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1348/096317906X113211 · DOI
  14. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000188 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1177/0193945916659507 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/job.322 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.5465/19416520903047327 · DOI
  20. 10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Judge T. A., 1997, The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach, Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151
  23. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.006 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0001-8791(87)90044-3 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s10869-008-9080-2 · DOI
  26. 10.5465/amj.2011.0113 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.019 · DOI
  28. 10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172 · DOI
  29. 10.1037/a0039003 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s12160-009-9111-x · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1007/978-94-007-5640-3_4 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1177/1094428109351241 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.bushor.2008.10.002 · DOI
  36. 10.1186/s13612-015-0034-y · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.2307/256865 · DOI
  38. 10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1108/JMP-05-2012-0148 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.007 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/joop.12128 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/1359432X.2016.1224233 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/hrm.21758 · DOI
  44. Wang H.‐J., 2017, Proactivity at work. Making things happen in organizations
  45. 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00697.x · DOI
  47. 10.2307/259118 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.5465/amj.2010.48037118 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 121

Metadata

Authors
Thun, S., & Bakker, A. B.
Affiliations
  • Trøndelag R&D Institute Trondheim Norway
  • Center of Excellence for Positive Organizational Psychology Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
ORCID
Thun, Sylvi
Venue
Stress and Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-06-08
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
573-581
ISSN
  • 1532-3005
  • 1532-2998
DOI
10.1002/smi.2818
Cited by
121
References
12
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review