The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 112 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism
Open accessAbstract
This article suggests that dynamic capabilities can give the firm competitive advantage, but this effect is contingent on the level of dynamism of the firm's external environment. A nonlinear, inverse U ‐shaped moderation is proposed, implying that the relationship between dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage is strongest under intermediate levels of dynamism but comparatively weaker when dynamism is low or high. This proposition is tested using data on alliance management capability and new product development capability, two specific dynamic capabilities widely recognized in prior research. Results based on longitudinal key informant data from 279 firms support the account that these dynamic capabilities are more strongly associated with competitive advantage in moderately dynamic than in stable or highly dynamic environments . Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
6 of 112 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Other significant costs may result from wrongly estimating the need for resource alterations, which happens when firms use their dynamic capabilities when there is no compelling need for change (Winter, 2003).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In the “Contrasting cost structures” passage (labeled Abstract; page not provided), Winter says that exercising a dynamic capability without a sound occasion for change can be costly. He specifically warns that attempting too much change can impose additional costs when disruption outweighs the value of the novelty achieved. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Second, even when environmental states appear familiar and previously successful organizational responses can be identified, this does not necessarily ensure that the same response will again and again be the most effective one (Jansen et al., 2006;Pierce et al., 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Jansen et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion and Conclusion (page unavailable) reports that exploiting existing products and markets can reduce financial performance in dynamic environments, supporting the point that a response need not remain effective. The paper does not examine apparently familiar environmental states or whether a previously successful response remains the best choice when those states recur. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not matchedcites Pierce et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“New product development and alliancing turned out to be among the most frequent responses.”
- Also stated in: § HYPOTHESES · plain
“Fourth, in the explorative fieldwork, alliance management and new product development were the most frequently named types of routine activities for adapting organizations to changes in the environment (see the Method section).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Qualitative field interviews
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § HYPOTHESES · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results based on longitudinal key informant data from 279 firms support the account that these dynamic capabilities are more strongly associated with competitive advantage in moderately dynamic than in stable or highly dynamic environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Superior firm performance relative to rivals is a valid empirical indicator of competitive advantage.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the negative and highly significant coefficients of the two squared product terms suggest that the relationships between the two dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage vary across different levels of environmental dynamism in a quadratic manner.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the multi-group analyses (see Appendix S1) showed that the positive effects of the two capabilities on competitive advantage were still statistically significant in the high dynamism subgroup.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results indicate significant differences among these settings, underlining the importance of considering the degree of environmental dynamism when making claims about performance implications of dynamic capabilities.”
- Also stated in: § 198 O. Schilke · boosted
“They point to striking differences in the dynamic capabilities-competitive advantage relationship between settings characterized by different degrees of environmental dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § 198 O. Schilke · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The analyses indicated that the effects of the two capabilities on competitive advantage are highest when environmental dynamism is moderate and comparatively lower when environmental dynamism is low or high.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proposed inverse U-shaped relationship between dynamic capability and competitive advantage across increasing levels of environmental dynamism is apparent in both graphs.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the regression coefficient of 0.37 indicates a positive and highly significant (p ≤ 0.01) relationship between alliance management capability and competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 50
- It may state two separate claims as one. 33
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“I received 302 usable responses, reflecting a response rate of 21.8 percent, which is consistent with comparable studies using key informant methodology (e.g., Capron and Mitchell, 2009).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Capron and Mitchell, 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In Data collection and sample (page not provided), Capron and Mitchell describe a survey of senior managers and call its 135 mail responses a reasonable number. The citation supports an example of a comparable senior-manager survey, but the paper does not establish that a 21.8% response rate is typical: it reports 135 responses from about 1,500 mailed surveys and 27 from 90 executive-education participants. The 302 responses and 21.8% rate are the citing author's own figures, not figures attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“One suggests that their effect on competitive advantage is comparatively smaller at low levels of dynamism (Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011;Helfat et al., 2007;Winter, 2003;Zahra et al., 2006;Zollo and Winter, 2002)”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011 source
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In “No ‘rule for riches’ here” (page unavailable), Winter argues that when opportunities for competitively significant change are sparse, the costs of dynamic capabilities may exceed their average benefits. That supports the cited position that their contribution to competitive advantage is smaller in less dynamic environments. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“I acknowledge both the cost argument (Winter, 2003;Zahra et al., 2006;Zollo and Winter, 2002), which suggests that stable environments may not provide sufficient opportunities to cover the costs of developing dynamic capabilities”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In “Contrasting cost structures,” Winter says that a dynamic capability must be exercised to justify its costs; otherwise it is a cost burden. In “No ‘rule for riches’ here,” he adds that when opportunities for significant change are sparse, the added costs may not be matched by benefits. This supports the claim about stable environments. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zahra et al., 2006 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zollo and Winter, 2002 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, this study has adopted a rather narrow definition of dynamic capabilities that focuses on experience-based, rather static routines and excludes more flexible forms of organizational change (consistent with, for example, Pierce et al., 2002;Winter, 2003;Zollo and Winter, 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pierce et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In the passages labelled “Understanding Dynamic Capabilities > Abstract” (page unavailable), Winter describes dynamic capabilities as learned, patterned change roles and distinguishes them from non-routine, opportunistic ad hoc problem solving. That distinction is consistent with the citing study’s stated choice to focus on routines rather than more flexible, ad hoc forms of change. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zollo and Winter, 2002 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was considerable agreement that organizational change routines can support firms' competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Qualitative field interviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Managers disagreed, however, with regard to the relative performance implications under varying degrees of environmental dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Qualitative field interviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, it is important to note that the efficacy of dynamic capabilities decreased significantly when moving from medium to high environmental dynamism, consistent with this article's argument that they exert their relatively strongest positive impact when dynamism is at intermediate levels.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, the findings presented here suggest that dynamic capabilities have more complicated performance effects than previously assumed, ranging from nonsignificant in very stable and very dynamic settings to strongly positive in moderately dynamic environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the control variables, firm size is significantly related to competitive advantage (b = 0.12; p ≤ 0.01).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four supplemental analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > POST-HOC ANALYSES
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Another group of researchers has stressed that routine-based dynamic capabilities are not always an adequate means of change, even if there is a significant need for resource configurations (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000;Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These costs typically arise from various activities involved in devising new resources, reconfiguring existing ones, and combinations thereof.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently, there are two competing views on the effect of environmental dynamism on the link between dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage, with little integration of both perspectives.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One important source of concern is that the presence of dynamic capabilities has frequently been equated with environmental conditions characterized by high dynamism (Zahra, Sapienza, and Davidsson, 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zahra, Sapienza, and Davidsson, 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This can create significant costs because the frequent disruption of the underlying resource base may degrade structural reproducibility and hence decrease an organization's ability to act as a reliable and accountable collective entity.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Traditionally, the literature has assumed a universally positive effect of dynamic capabilities on competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > THEORETICAL BACKGROUND Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Teece and Pisano, 1994 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“These environments typically reward consistent exploitation of existing resources (Leonard-Barton, 1992;Teece, 2007), whereas constantly reconfiguring resources may disrupt the efficiency and value potential of the firm's resources.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While strategic alliances give firms access to resources that lie outside of their boundaries (Das and Teng, 2000), new product development aims at updating the firm's product portfolio (Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Das and Teng, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, these two capabilities are particularly representative for the dynamic capabilities concept, which makes them ideal candidates for this study.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, building and maintaining an alliance management capability usually requires substantial investments in, for example, a dedicated alliance function that oversees and supports alliance operations (Heimeriks and Duysters, 2007;Helfat et al., 2007;Kale, Dyer, and Singh, 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While strategic alliances give firms access to resources that lie outside of their boundaries (Das and Teng, 2000), new product development aims at updating the firm's product portfolio (Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Matching unfamiliar situations with organizational changes proves difficult and may lead either to unresponsiveness or normalization and, in turn, implementation of inappropriate responses.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Organizations with a strong alliance management capability possess routines that support various alliance-related tasks, such as partner identification and interorganizational learning, that facilitate an effective execution of 184 O. Schilke interfirm relationships (Schilke and Goerzen, 2010;Schreiner, Kale, and Corsten, 2009).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More specifically, contexts where change is frequent and 182 O. Schilke unpredictable and the environment shifts uncertainly among states that place novel demands on the organization produce two kinds of problems for dynamic capabilities, the first of which I call a 'matching problem' and the second an 'inertia problem.'”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I expect that when environmental dynamism is high, dynamic capabilities may also have a relatively weak impact on the competitive advantage of firms.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While supporting the institutionalization of alliance management capability, such investments are typically associated with nontrivial costs.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, I recognize that environmental dynamism affects both the extent of opportunities to change and the organizational capacity to exploit these opportunities via routine-based change, thus acknowledging the validity of the arguments from both research camps.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When environmental dynamism is at the intermediate level, there is both a potential for organizational change and the capacity to make good use of the routinized practices that underlie dynamic capabilities.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, I expect the positive effect of dynamic capabilities first to increase but then to diminish as environmental dynamism continues to rise, eventually declining at high levels of dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“First, strategic alliances and new product development are essential means for reconfiguring the organizational resource base.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Das and Teng, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Terjesen, Patel, and Covin (2011), for example, report significant positive associations between environmental dynamism and alliance partner diversity as well as alliance geographic diversity.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Terjesen, Patel, and Covin, 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These environments are dynamic enough to create opportunities for change but stable enough for organizations to recognize reoccurring problem structures and successfully leverage solutions existing in organizational memory.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, I expect that dynamic capabilities have the relatively strongest positive effect on the On the Contingent Value of Dynamic Capabilities 183 competitive advantage of firms when environmental dynamism is intermediate.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although highly dynamic environments provide ample opportunities for resource reconfigurations, the high frequency of novel situations and the necessity to bring about discontinuous organizational change in these settings make the routinebased mechanisms dynamic capabilities rest on comparatively less appropriate, given the matching and inertia problems associated with them.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Given the absence of relevant stimulus knowledge, an out-of-family state may either be ignored or become normalized-that is, treated as if it were a familiar event already encountered and understood in the past-, and potentially inappropriate organizational responses may in turn be matched to these normalized situations (Levinthal and Rerup, 2006;Weick and Sutcliffe, 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The extant empirical literature finds that alliance management capability tends to be positively related to performance (see Sluyts et al., 2011 for a recent review).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sluyts et al., 2011 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Following a patterned stimulus-response logic, they match particular environmental states with certain avenues for organizational change (Levinthal, 2000;Pierce et al., 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Levinthal, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Pierce et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“When possible, survey information obtained from the key informant in the main study was triangulated with complementary data sources to establish its accuracy (Homburg et al., 2012), as described below.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measures
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Homburg et al., 2012 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, when environmental dynamism is at an intermediate level, there is a potential for repeated new product launches that make investments in capability development worthwhile and firms also have the capacity to utilize effectively experiencebased new product development routines to create new, successful products that build on existing solutions.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Firm age has been suggested to influence a firm's competitive advantage (Zahra, Ireland, and Hitt, 2000) as well as the extent of patterned forms of behavior that underpin dynamic capabilities (Helfat and Peteraf, 2003).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Control variables
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It is commonly assumed that such routines lead to new product innovations that in turn result in competitive advantage (Lawson and Samson, 2001).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lawson and Samson, 2001 source
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In line with Zott and Amit (2008), I controlled for the breadth of the firm's product offering and targeted market, as these are key dimensions of a firm's strategy that may affect its competitive advantage and capability development.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Control variables
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zott and Amit, 2008 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, 73.5 percent of the participants in the final dataset had been with their current firm for six years or longer (see Table 1).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Similar to my discussion of alliance management capability, it is important to note that a new product development capability usually entails durable commitment of funds-e.g., to support skilled personnel, specialized facilities, and stateof-the-art equipment (Helfat et al., 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“I found significant associations for growth in sales revenues (r = 0.32, p ≤ 0.01), number of employees (r = 0.28, p ≤ 0.001), and accounting value of assets (r = 0.39, p ≤ 0.001), which lends further credibility to the perceptual competitive advantage measure.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Following the recommendations of DeVellis (2003), the questionnaire items were further refined through in-depth interviews with 13 managers (described above), an item sorting pretest based on Anderson and Gerbing (1991) administered to 15 scholars, and a pretest of the questionnaire conducted with 21 managers.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measures
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites DeVellis, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Anderson and Gerbing, 1991 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Long known as a best-in-class 'new product machine' with highly professionalized innovation routines that allowed for continuously and quickly bringing a large number of products to the market, the firm began to struggle when the environment was beginning to change drastically in the early 1990s.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In the moderately dynamic 186 O. Schilke mainframe sector, for example, Eisenhardt and Tabrizi (1995) find the capability's underlying routines to substantially enhance predictability and effectiveness by coordinating the entire new product development process from initial specification through manufacturing ramp-up whereas such routines were less beneficial in the more dynamic personal computing”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Eisenhardt and Tabrizi, 1995 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Also, firms with strong alliance management capability tend to follow established partner selection protocols (Heimeriks, 2010) and tend to engage in social bonding with their partners (Schreiner et al., 2009), both of which favor repeated ties with the same portfolio of alliance partners.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The values obtained indicate reliable and valid measures of the individual constructs.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measurement properties of constructs
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“My objectives were to establish temporal order of the independent variables (preceding in time) to the dependent variables to enhance causal inference (Biddle, Slavings, and Anderson, 1985) as well as to allow time for the performance effects of dynamic capabilities to materialize (Zahra et al., 2006: 947) and also to reduce the threat of a potential common method bias that could have been present”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“While this sample size may not be considered very large, it is much in line with sample sizes in other strategy studies (Phelan, Ferreira, and Salvador, 2002) and exceeds common recommendations for advanced statistical analyses (e.g., MacCallum et al., 1999).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I obtained an ICC(1) of 0.20, which clearly exceeds the common 0.1 threshold.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Environmental dynamism
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The importance of the industry in which a firm competes as a predictor of firm-level variables is widely recognized in the literature (Dess, Ireland, and Hitt, 1990).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Control variables
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Dess, Ireland, and Hitt, 1990 source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For example, Clark and Fujimoto (1990) find that investing in specialized coordination committees promotes routinized product development.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Clark and Fujimoto, 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Environmental dynamism refers to the volatility and unpredictability of the firm's external environment (Miller and Friesen, 1983).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Miller and Friesen, 1983 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“I obtained an ICC(1) of 0.24, which clearly exceeded Bliese's (1998) 0.1 cutoff.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bliese, 1998 source
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“I used the measure developed by Schilke and Goerzen (2010), which suggests a five-dimensional, second-order structure of the construct, with the underlying dimensions of (1) interorganizational coordination; (2) alliance portfolio coordination; (3) interorganizational learning; (4) alliance proactiveness; and (5) alliance transformation.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schilke and Goerzen, 2010 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At intermediate levels of dynamism, finally, I expect a balance to exist between firms' ability to leverage their alliance management investments and to effectively exploit their experience-based alliance management routines.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In these settings, alliances are frequent enough to justify the costs of developing alliance management capability, and environmental states are similar enough to pursue alliance management in a routinized fashion that strongly builds on past experiences and to make effective use of similar types of alliances.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, although this dataset included a broad range of manufacturing firms representing a variety of industries, care should be exercised in generalizing the results.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As such, both dynamic capabilities have a positive relationship with competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dynamism could alter the fabric of the industry and cause the decay of the firm's resources or render them strategically irrelevant.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In terms of managerial implications, the results suggest that investments in building dynamic capabilities (such as alliance management capability and new product development capability) are strategically justified in many firm environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though some of the routines develop accidentally, others require managers' patient investments and foresight in deciding where and how to build these capabilities as well as how to deploy them to achieve a competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overall, this study thus helps reduce ambiguities regarding the role of environmental dynamism in the dynamic capabilities framework (Zahra et al., 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zahra et al., 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The study's empirical findings help clarify a key contingency that influences the efficacy of dynamic capabilities.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“First, and most importantly, measures of the dependent variable were collected in a separate survey (Podsakoff and Organ, 1986).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Common method bias
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Podsakoff and Organ, 1986 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As noted, dynamic capabilities reconfigure a firm's resource base, and managers need to pay attention to building and exploiting these capabilities in ways that generate a competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The U-shaped moderation proposed and tested here implies that both arguments are valid and that the interaction among dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage may be more complex than a simple linear relationship considered by earlier work (e.g., Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the fact that the sample consists of both firms and business units may be viewed as a limitation, I control for this issue in the empirical analysis as described further below.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“while the other raises doubts about their effectiveness in highly dynamic environments (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000;Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The results of the multi-group analyses lent further support to the hypotheses.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > POST-HOC ANALYSES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Byrne, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“It suggests a less extreme position in that these capabilities can be strategically valuable even in high velocity environments, possibly because an inventory of established change repertories can indirectly facilitate novel action by providing the fodder for new recombinations (Levinthal and Rerup, 2006;Wirtz, Mathieu, and Schilke, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interactions were positive up to the median and then became negative, in line with Hypotheses 1 and 2”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > POST-HOC ANALYSES
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Superior firm performance relative to rivals is a valid empirical indicator of competitive advantage.
“Consistent with this conceptualization, superior firm performance relative to rivals commonly serves as an empirical indicator of competitive advantage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In highly dynamic environments, product lifecycles tend to be comparatively short and technological paradigm shifts relatively frequent.
“In highly dynamic environments, on the other hand, product lifecycles tend to be comparatively short and technological paradigm shifts relatively frequent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The chemicals, machinery, and motor vehicle industries provide a wide variance in environmental dynamism.
“in order to capture a wide variance in the moderating variable environmental dynamism”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ED is a key factor in DC theory (see Schilke, 2014), which suggests that the differential effects of dynamic capabilities on organisational performance (see Helfat and Winter, 2011; Chen et al., 2015) are contingent on the level of dynamism of the organisation's external environment (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000).”
In the citing paper
“The development of this theory is useful to explain how the dynamic capabilities of the organisation may provide value (Aragón -Correa and Sharma, 2003; Schilke, 2014).”
In the citing paper
“Although the dynamic capabilities view has been increasingly used as one of the most important theoretical lenses, the theory has been criticized by some scholars due to poorly defined boundary conditions and its confounding discussion of the effect of dynamic capabilities (e.g., Arend and Bromiley, 2009; Schilke, 2014).”
In the citing paper
“Following Schilke's (2014) arguments, dynamic capabilities have differential performance effects in very stable and very dynamic settings and strongly positive ones in moderately dynamic environments.”
From Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations (2020) · cites this paper as Schilke's (2014)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Discussion reverses the stated moderation shape
MinorThe discussion calls the proposed moderation U-shaped, while the paper repeatedly describes and tests an inverse U-shaped moderation. Those shapes have opposite implications for where the capability effect is strongest.
“The U-shaped moderation proposed and tested here implies that both arguments are valid”
“I propose a novel inverse U-shaped moderating effect”
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
(1991) · Cited by 15,554
Qu, X. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s455 · Cited by 14,759
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach
Wooldridge, J. M. (1999) · Cited by 14,354
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 132 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Arbuckle JL, 2007, Amos 16.0 User's Guide
- Centre for European Economic Research, 2004, ZEW Sector Reports on Innovation 2003
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11 · DOI
- Pierce JL, 2002, The Economics of Change, Choice and Structure: Essays in the Memory of Richard M. Cyert, 81
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,253
Zhou, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhou, L., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2025.3582095 · Cited by 2
Peng, M. Y. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05076-4 · Cited by 3
“While some scholars believe that DICs have a positive correlation with performance (Stadler et al., 2013), other studies have found negative or no signi fi cant correlations (Schilke, 2014).”
Syed, T. A., Bhatti, Z. A., Clifft, S., Siraj, S., Pahuja, A., & Nawaz, R. (2025) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.70014 · Cited by 2
Altmann, P. (2016) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s2397-52102016029 · Cited by 2
Zahn, E. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-55426-5_13 · Cited by 2
Morgan, T. A. (2015) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 2
Zacharias, N. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2017.558 · Cited by 2
“With this study, we follow the path of recent research [36] that has started to disagree with the widespread assumption that dynamic capabilities are generally positive and that in some settings, the expected benefits cannot be realized.”
BackgroundSistemas de Informação Estratégicos Habilitando Estratégia-como-prática na Incerteza Ambiental
Yoshikuni, A. C., & Albertin, A. L. (2018) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/1982-7849rac2018170253 · Cited by 5
Minciullo, M., & Pedrini, M. (2018) · Corporate Ownership and Control · doi:10.22495/cocv16i1art7 · Cited by 2
Kadir, M. N. A., Shariff, M. N. M., & Shamsuddin, J. B. (2018) · International journal of entrepreneurship · Cited by 2
Peran Entrepreneur Orientation Terhadap Volatilitas UKM Dengan Budaya Lokal Sebagai Pemediasi
Djaddang, S., Lysandra, S., & Mulyadi (2019) · JRB-Jurnal Riset Bisnis · doi:10.35592/jrb.v2i1.254 · Cited by 2
Kiisk, V. (2019) · doi:10.1109/ieem44572.2019.8978774 · Cited by 2
“Such, some studies revealed that as external knowledge search outpaces internal development, the overall performance starts to suffer [4], while other suggested dominance of external learning [15].”
BackgroundAbel, R., Bort, S., Maurer, I., Weber, C. E., & Wilhelm, H. (2020) · Research in the sociology of organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20200000067015 · Cited by 2
Raasch, M., Silveira-Martins, E., Tondolo, V. A. G., & de Moura, G. L. (2020) · Revista de Administração da UFSM · doi:10.5902/1983465941355 · Cited by 2
Stańczyk-Hugiet, E., Kozyra, C., Piórkowska, K., et al. (2020) · EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL · doi:10.35808/ersj/1927 · Cited by 2
“Volatile market shares’ and environmental dynamism (5-item scale, the exemplary one: ‘The environmental demands on us are constantly changing’) developed by Schilke (2014).”
BackgroundThe Effect of Review Quality on Review Helpfulness :The Moderating Role of Review Star ratings
Roh, M. (2021) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2021.22.6.999 · Cited by 2
Country-governance quality and signals in the alliance formation process: a meta-analytic approach
Rossmannek, O., Bosch, F., & Fink, K. (2022) · International Journal of Business Environment · doi:10.1504/ijbe.2022.120337 · Cited by 2
Strategic Learning for Agile Maneuvering in High Technology SMEs
Sirén, C. A., & Kohtamäki, M. (2014) · Advances in logistics, operations, and management science book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-5962-9.ch004 · Cited by 2
Chen, L., Lim, S. H., Xu, S., et al. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15010671 · Cited by 2
Dopasowanie strategiczne a konkurencyjność firm z sektora MSP – moderująca rola otoczenia
Głód, G., & Wronka-Pośpiech, M. (2022) · Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów / Szkoła Główna Handlowa · doi:10.33119/sip.2022.184.4 · Cited by 2
modelos matemáticos del desarrollo organizacional y los cambios organizacionales
Александрович, М. П. (2018) · Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa · doi:10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.2378 · Cited by 2
Ratnasari, A., & Marfu, A. (2023) · International Journal of Current Science Research and Review · doi:10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i7-111 · Cited by 2
“The external environment substantially impacts an organization's strategy and operations, and to remain relevant and competitive, organizations must monitor and respond to environmental changes (Schilke, 2014).”
BackgroundA Semi-Formalization of the Dynamic Capability View
Wilden, R., Devinney, T. M., & Lin, N. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199678914.013.024 · Cited by 2
Social Psychological Foundations of Alliance Cooperation
Poppo, L., Schloemer, H., & Rogers, K. M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108236188.010 · Cited by 2
Balaraman, K. K., & Sundarraj, R. P. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2019.2919120 · Cited by 2
Crick, J. M. (2020) · International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business · doi:10.1504/ijesb.2020.10032029 · Cited by 2
Measuring and managing risk in UK listed firms
Roberts, P. S. (2016) · Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) · Cited by 2
Strategic Learning: A Route to Competitive Advantage?
Sirén, C. A. (2014) · Osuva (University of Vaasa) · Cited by 2
The Impact of Human Resource Differentiation on Corporate Strategic and Financial Performance
Huang, X., Zhang, L., & Feng, C. (2017) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2017.10398abstract · Cited by 2
The influence of service innovation practices on business performance
Makgopa, S. S. (2019) · UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) · Cited by 2
Zucker, L. G., & Schilke, O. S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4529580 · Cited by 2
Self-citationPerformance Assessment of R&D-Intensive Manufacturing Companies on Dynamic Capabilities
Darvizeh, M., Yang, J., & Eldridge, S. (2020) · International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences · doi:10.4018/ijsds.2020100101 · Cited by 1
Alliance learning process and alliance success: the moderating role of openness
Waheed, A., Shafiq, S., & Mirza, B. (2022) · Journal of Asia Business Studies · doi:10.1108/jabs-10-2021-0409 · Cited by 1
Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Control Systems: A Study at Itaipu Binacional
Panek, L., & Tavares, R. (2023) · Brazilian Business Review · doi:10.15728/bbr.2023.1496.en · Cited by 2
“…of dynamic capabilities has been widely discussed in the past few years (Araújo et al., 2022; Eisenhardt & Martin, 2000; Helfat & Martin, 2015; Helfat & Peteraf, 2003; Kurtmollaiev, 2020; Leemann & Kanbach, 2022; Salvato & Vassolo, 2018; Teece, 2007; 2014; Wang & Ahmed, 2007; Zollo & Winter, 2002).”
Zasobowe uwarunkowania zdolności internacjonalizacyjnej przedsiębiorstw. Wiedza. Relacje. Kultura
Szymura-Tyc, M., Sulimowska-Formowicz, M., & Babińska, D. (2023) · doi:10.22367/uekat.9788378758730 · Cited by 1
Torrez, J. M. (2024) · Ruta · doi:10.15443/ruta2023755 · Cited by 1
Linh, N. P., & Uyen, N. T. (2024) · Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development · doi:10.24294/jipd.v8i5.6026 · Cited by 1
“The CAD measure included six items that were adopted in the from Schilke (2014).”
BackgroundMethodMunawar, A., Prabowo, H., Abdinagoro, S. B., & Alamsjah, F. (2025) · International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management · doi:10.1142/s0219877025500051 · Cited by 1
An integrated review on optimal distinctiveness: multidimensionality and contingency
Yang, J., & Li, Y. (2025) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-025-00503-x · Cited by 1
“These contingencies necessitate organizations to cultivate dynamic capabilities to adapt to ongoing changes (Kim & Toh 2019; Schilke 2014).”
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM ORGANISATIONS IN POLAND
Dominiczewska, M. (2025) · Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series · doi:10.29119/1641-3466.2025.217.3 · Cited by 1
Manero, M. D. C. B., Tartaglione, A. M., Cavacece, Y., & Maggiore, G. (2025) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-09-2024-0988 · Cited by 2
There’s no success like failure: organizational breakdowns and the development of new capabilities
Tootoonchy, M., & Clegg, S. R. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/jocm-05-2024-0269 · Cited by 2
Hanna, N. B., Zahn, E., Aziz, H. H. A., Kirkland, C. M., & Holmes, R. M. (2025) · Africa Journal of Management · doi:10.1080/23322373.2025.2535253 · Cited by 1
Dai, W., Jiang, Y., Zhao, Y., et al. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · doi:10.1002/cjas.70031 · Cited by 1
Surviving and thriving: an organizational resilience framework in the digital age
Lu, J., Wang, X., Feng, Y., & Liu, L. (2025) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-10-2024-1044 · Cited by 2
Huang, T., Ding, F., Liu, R., Wang, Y., & Lin, Y. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18020926 · Cited by 1
Chen, Y., Lu, Y., Qiu, W., et al. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18031242 · Cited by 1
Garibbo, V. M., Annunziata, E., Rizzi, F., & Frey, M. (2026) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.70449 · Cited by 2
The paradoxical relationship between familiness and business innovation
Ruiz‐Fernández, L., Rienda, L., & Andreu, R. (2026) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-05-2025-1429 · Cited by 1
Shanka, M. S. (2026) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2026.02.014 · Cited by 1
Lin, J., Wu, S., Luo, X. R., & Benitez, J. (2026) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.70041 · Cited by 4
Vu, K.-C., He, X., & Lengler, J. (2026) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2026.102587 · Cited by 1
Cruz, F. S., & Tavares, F. O. (2026) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci16030152 · Cited by 2
“In addition, the variables related to strategic alliances and alliance portfolios were operationalised following the model advanced by Schilke (2014), allowing for a comprehensive assessment of inter-organisational competences.”
InfluentialChandrakumarmangalam, S., Velusamy, M., Kumarasamy, S. P., Palanismy, S., Alagarsamy, A., Alfarraj, S. A., Belay, M., Abbas, M., Kalathil, S., & Alharbi, S. A. (2026) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-026-17439-5 · Cited by 1
Humran, M. A., Halim, M. A. S. A., & Ahmad, A. (2026) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-06-2025-0566 · Cited by 4
Digitalization and firm performance: the need for strategic decision-making
Guo, W., Zhang, F., & Zhou, Z. (2026) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-06-2025-1789 · Cited by 1
Dynamic capabilities erosion: a systematic review, integrative framework, and research agenda
Silveira, L. G. D. P., & de Paula, E. V. (2026) · Future Business Journal · doi:10.1186/s43093-026-00800-1 · Cited by 3
Linking environmental management capabilities to learning and performance: evidence from SMEs
Li, Y., Lim, A., Pek, C. K., Xiang, X., & 黄海 (2026) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-09-2025-0883 · Cited by 2
Ciszewska‐Mlinarič, M., Morgan-Thomas, A., & Wójcik, P. (2026) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116183 · Cited by 2
Lee, H. S., & Matanda, M. J. (2026) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2026.03.019 · Cited by 2
Adıgüzel, Z., Çakır, F. S., & Morgül, Ü. A. (2026) · EuroMed Journal of Business · doi:10.1108/emjb-10-2025-0395 · Cited by 1
Ubaidillah, A., Arifin, Z., Mawardi, M. K., & Noerman, T. (2026) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2026.2658763 · Cited by 2
Guzmán, D. B., & Alesón, M. L. R. (2026) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-026-00623-w · Cited by 1
“High industry dynamism increases the likelihood of product obsolescence and sales volatility, amplifying the risk of demand shocks (Schilke, 2014).”
Bediako, A. K., Kwateng, K. O., Tetteh, F. K., & Mensah, J. (2026) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-12-2025-1225 · Cited by 1
Wei, S., Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. (2026) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-09-2021-0720 · Cited by 1
Okon, E., MORGAN, M. O., & Almeida, F. (2026) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.71027 · Cited by 8
Francis, A., & Patri, R. (2026) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-02-2026-0097 · Cited by 1
Cristofaro, M., Giardino, P. L., & Teece, D. J. (2026) · Journal of Management History · doi:10.1108/jmh-04-2026-0086 · Cited by 2
Stulova, V., & Rungi, M. (2014) · doi:10.1109/ieem.2014.7058807 · Cited by 1
The Roles of Knowledge Management and Organizational Innovation in Global Business
Kasemsap, K. (2016) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9562-7.ch087 · Cited by 9
Strategic Action: Four Elements for Increasing the Effectiveness of Marketing Actions
Cavallone, M. (2017) · International series in advanced management studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51991-3_2 · Cited by 1
Wycena przedsiębiorstw będących w trudnej sytuacji finansowej
Prusak, B. (2017) · Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów / Szkoła Główna Handlowa · Cited by 1
Yassien, E., & Alnajjar, F. J. (2020) · International Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.5539/ijbm.v15n4p138 · Cited by 1
“Whereas PC cannot be considered as DC because the defined PC (defect - removal and functionality enhancement) in their study is not strategic, instead, they are operational in definition as the organizational capabilities are defined, where organizational capabilities are about doing things in the right way and achiev…”
BackgroundAlnahedh, M. A., & Alrashdan, A. A. (2021) · World Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development · doi:10.1108/wjemsd-09-2020-0115 · Cited by 1
Rijck, P. D. (2022) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.749 · Cited by 1
Volberda, H., van den Bosch, F., & Heij, K. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198792048.003.0006 · Cited by 1
Managerial Myopia Control to Improve Financial Performance in Microfinance Institutions
Anam, A. K., Khajar, I., & Mutamimah, M. (2023) · Review of Economics and Finance · doi:10.55365/1923.x2023.21.17 · Cited by 1
Venkataraman, A., Madsen, J. L., & Abrantes, B. F. (2023) · Studies on entrepreneurship, structural change and industrial dynamics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34814-3_2 · Cited by 1
Schaarschmidt, M., Sainidis, E., Matheus, T., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919623500342 · Cited by 1
Alshammari, A. S., ALHAMDHAWI, F. F., & Muneer, S. (2023) · Industria Textila · doi:10.35530/it.074.06.2022143 · Cited by 1
Rahmat, M. (2024) · Jurnal Siasat Bisnis · doi:10.20885/jsb.vol28.iss1.art1 · Cited by 1
“Moreover, research by (Schilke, 2014) has shown results there are relationships between dynamic skills and the competitive advantage of organizations, which are influenced by the external environment.”
BackgroundRivière, M., Andersson, U. R., & Bass, A. E. (2024) · Multinational Business Review · doi:10.1108/mbr-05-2023-0072 · Cited by 3
A systematic content analysis of innovation in European competition law
Schrepel, T. (2024) · European Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10657-024-09817-9 · Cited by 2
“…reconfigure internal and external competences to address rapidly changing environments,” (Teece et al., 1997) informs what it takes for firms to constantly adapt to complex ecosystems, which can be seen as a process innovation (Li & Liu, 2014; Reuter et al., 2010; Schilke, 2013; Vivas López, 2005).”
Dynamic Capabilities to Drive Innovation and Competitivenss in a Changing Business World
Ortegón, A. D. P. B., Jimenez-Hernandez, P. R., & Ricaurte, G. F. M. (2024) · Advances in business strategy and competitive advantage book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-4046-2.ch005 · Cited by 1
Digital orientation and pivoting in new ventures: the role of dynamic capabilities
Fu, J. R., Jiao, Y., Zhu, R., Yan, Y., & Liu, Q. (2025) · Journal of strategy and management · doi:10.1108/jsma-07-2024-0166 · Cited by 1
Positive institutional distance and developing country firms in GVCs during the COVID-19 period
Cao, Y., Yuan, L., Chen, X., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-10-2023-1723 · Cited by 1
Nabila, N. J., & Anzum, K. M. T. (2024) · doi:10.46254/ba07.20240231 · Cited by 1
Waldron, T. L., Markman, G. D., McMullen, J. S., et al. (2025) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2024.0606 · Cited by 1
Xu, S., Tian, M., Cai, Y., & Fu, X. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17094232 · Cited by 1
“Consequently, the resource basis and allocation practices that companies previously relied upon have become less effective, diminishing their ability to fulfill expected roles, and undermining the advantages held by first-mover companies [37].”
Prince, C., & de la Harpe, A. (2015) · International Conference on Enterprise Systems (ES) · doi:10.1109/es.2015.16 · Cited by 1
“Developing new capabilities will create a competitive advantage for the business [56].”
BackgroundCordeiro, J. R., & Bataglia, W. (2015) · Contextus - Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão · doi:10.19094/contextus.v13i2.618 · Cited by 1
Xu, L., Gao, S., Zhang, L., et al. (2016) · Atlantis Press eBooks · doi:10.2991/978-94-6239-177-2_9 · Cited by 1
Measuring the Performance of Logistics Industry in the Context of Karachi
Quais, I., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2017) · Information Management and Business Review · doi:10.22610/imbr.v9i5.1960 · Cited by 1
Liu, F. (2018) · Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS · doi:10.24212/2179-3565.2018v9i2p20-28 · Cited by 1
Borch, O. J., & Kjerstad, N. (2018) · WMU studies in maritime affairs · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78425-0_22 · Cited by 1
Open Innovation of SMEs - An Innovation Ecosystem Perspective
Mei, L., Zhang, T., & Chen, J. (2018) · IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE) · doi:10.1109/tems-isie.2018.8478475 · Cited by 1
“0 based on maximum likelihood procedure [116] to assess the construct validity [117].”
BackgroundMethodDynamiczne zdolności marketingowe organizacji Koncepcja i wybrane obszary zastosowań
Mitręga, M. (2018) · Prace Naukowe / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach · Cited by 1
KIMANI, M. M., & OTINGA, D. H. N. (2019) · Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management · doi:10.61426/sjbcm.v6i1.1094 · Cited by 1
Zur Relevanz von Allianzmanagementfähigkeit bei kooperativen Dienstleistungen
Geigenmüller, A., & Leischnig, A. (2019) · Forum Dienstleistungsmanagement · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-26389-8_3 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Schilke, O.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schilke, Oliver
- ORCID
- Schilke, Oliver
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-05-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-203
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W1853999331
- Cited by
- 1,264
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 144 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 126.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- dynamic capabilities, competitive advantage, environmental dynamism, inverted U-shaped relationship, alliance management capability, new product development capability, external environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
