The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 112 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism
Open accessAbstract
This article suggests that dynamic capabilities can give the firm competitive advantage, but this effect is contingent on the level of dynamism of the firm's external environment. A nonlinear, inverse U ‐shaped moderation is proposed, implying that the relationship between dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage is strongest under intermediate levels of dynamism but comparatively weaker when dynamism is low or high. This proposition is tested using data on alliance management capability and new product development capability, two specific dynamic capabilities widely recognized in prior research. Results based on longitudinal key informant data from 279 firms support the account that these dynamic capabilities are more strongly associated with competitive advantage in moderately dynamic than in stable or highly dynamic environments . Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
6 of 112 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Other significant costs may result from wrongly estimating the need for resource alterations, which happens when firms use their dynamic capabilities when there is no compelling need for change (Winter, 2003).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In the “Contrasting cost structures” passage (labeled Abstract; page not provided), Winter says that exercising a dynamic capability without a sound occasion for change can be costly. He specifically warns that attempting too much change can impose additional costs when disruption outweighs the value of the novelty achieved. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Second, even when environmental states appear familiar and previously successful organizational responses can be identified, this does not necessarily ensure that the same response will again and again be the most effective one (Jansen et al., 2006;Pierce et al., 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Jansen et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion and Conclusion (page unavailable) reports that exploiting existing products and markets can reduce financial performance in dynamic environments, supporting the point that a response need not remain effective. The paper does not examine apparently familiar environmental states or whether a previously successful response remains the best choice when those states recur. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not matchedcites Pierce et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“New product development and alliancing turned out to be among the most frequent responses.”
- Also stated in: § HYPOTHESES · plain
“Fourth, in the explorative fieldwork, alliance management and new product development were the most frequently named types of routine activities for adapting organizations to changes in the environment (see the Method section).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Qualitative field interviews
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § HYPOTHESES · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results based on longitudinal key informant data from 279 firms support the account that these dynamic capabilities are more strongly associated with competitive advantage in moderately dynamic than in stable or highly dynamic environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Superior firm performance relative to rivals is a valid empirical indicator of competitive advantage.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the negative and highly significant coefficients of the two squared product terms suggest that the relationships between the two dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage vary across different levels of environmental dynamism in a quadratic manner.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the multi-group analyses (see Appendix S1) showed that the positive effects of the two capabilities on competitive advantage were still statistically significant in the high dynamism subgroup.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results indicate significant differences among these settings, underlining the importance of considering the degree of environmental dynamism when making claims about performance implications of dynamic capabilities.”
- Also stated in: § 198 O. Schilke · boosted
“They point to striking differences in the dynamic capabilities-competitive advantage relationship between settings characterized by different degrees of environmental dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § 198 O. Schilke · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The analyses indicated that the effects of the two capabilities on competitive advantage are highest when environmental dynamism is moderate and comparatively lower when environmental dynamism is low or high.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proposed inverse U-shaped relationship between dynamic capability and competitive advantage across increasing levels of environmental dynamism is apparent in both graphs.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the regression coefficient of 0.37 indicates a positive and highly significant (p ≤ 0.01) relationship between alliance management capability and competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Integrating these views, I found evidence for an inverse U-shaped contingent relationship where the effect of dynamic capabilities on competitive advantage is highest in moderately dynamic environments but lower under low and high levels of environmental dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Figure 1(b) shows an analogous inverse U-shaped graph for the regression of competitive advantage on new product development capability.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the range for which the respective regression coefficient is significant is located at slightly higher levels of environmental dynamism in the case of alliance management capability (between 2.3 and 4.9) as compared to new product development capability (between 2.1 and 4.4).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The coefficient of new product development capability shows that firms with a stronger new product development capability have a significantly higher competitive advantage (b = 0.39; p ≤ 0.01).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A turbulent environment, however, is not necessarily a component or precondition of dynamic capabilities, which can exist even in stable environments (Helfat and Winter, 2011).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Helfat and Winter, 2011 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The lower the need for change, the less likely the opportunity to 'strike' the option, making dynamic capabilities comparatively less valuable.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If a firm rarely has a need to change, its performance relative to competitors may suffer when it devotes significant resources to developing these capabilities.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This implies that a firm needs to use its dynamic capabilities repeatedly in order for them to produce significant value (Helfat and Winter, 2011).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Helfat and Winter, 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Further, researchers have tended to identify dynamic capabilities post hoc, often equating their existence with successful organizational outcomes.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Helfat and Peteraf, 2009 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additional costs might accrue if continual reconfigurations of resources unnecessarily disrupt ongoing learning activities by preventing the firm from recognizing potential differences in the outcome of its resources under different conditions.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This practice makes it difficult to separate the existence of dynamic capabilities from their effects (Helfat and Peteraf, 2009).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Helfat and Peteraf, 2009 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is because building and using dynamic capabilities are costly.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“An important feature of the routines underlying dynamic capabilities is that they are path dependent and therefore based on interpretations and outcomes of past actions (Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In sum, I propose that highly dynamic environments with their unfamiliar states and demand for novel actions pose distinct challenges to the effectiveness of dynamic capabilities.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“research on experiential learning argues that this type of organizational change may prove problematic when previously unknown forces continuously alter the basis of competitive success (Levinthal and Rerup, 2006;March and Levinthal, 1993), as is the case in highly dynamic environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Levinthal and Rerup, 2006 source
- Not matchedcites March and Levinthal, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A nonlinear, inverse U-shaped moderation is proposed, implying that the relationship between dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage is strongest under intermediate levels of dynamism but comparatively weaker when dynamism is low or high.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For this experiencebased matching process to work, however, the organization must have encountered the particular (or at least a comparable) environmental state before.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Given that a proven response to an identified problem exists in organizational memory, experimentation with alternatives becomes less attractive, crowding out explorative activities that would go beyond the beaten track (Levinthal, 1991;Levinthal and Myatt, 1994;Sørensen and Stuart, 2000).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, highly dynamic environments may cause an inertia problem in that alliance management capability may limit a firm's tendency to experiment with alternative behavior.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The automated stimulus-response logic underlying dynamic capabilities, however, tends not to incentivize scrutiny.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In these situations, organizational routines for adapting the resource base may be of reduced value, in particular when considering the costs associated with them.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Importantly, it can pertain not only to an organization's zero-order capabilities but to its dynamic capabilities as well, since routine-based organizational change tends to favor local adaptations (Collis, 1994;Levinthal, 1997;Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This article suggests that dynamic capabilities can give the firm competitive advantage, but this effect is contingent on the level of dynamism of the firm's external environment.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Especially when environmental dynamism is high and contextual change is fundamental and discontinuous, long-jump reorientations that require entirely novel solutions often prove more beneficial for a firm's competitive advantage than local adaptations from within the current set of available actions”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When environmental dynamism is low , the potential of dynamic capabilities is limited because there are few occasions to exercise them effectively.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This is because alliance management capability rests on routinized practices that leverage lessons learned from prior alliances (Anand and Khanna, 2000;Heimeriks, 2010).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Anand and Khanna, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Heimeriks, 2010 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“'Out-of-family' states, which are common when environmental dynamism is high, pose problems to the effectiveness of dynamic capabilities in that they do not trigger a programmed reactivation of matching organizational change.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, experience-based adaptation is often associated with inertial forces that impede employing less local, more path-breaking changes that are often required for organizations in highly dynamic environments to create a competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearA claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Thus, the extent to which firms engage in alliances depends (ceteris paribus) on the degree of environmental dynamism, with low dynamism providing relatively little need to make sufficient use of alliance management routines so that the costs from alliance management capability would be far outweighed by its gains.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the high degree of novelty that firms operating in highly dynamic environments are likely to face in their alliances, matching appropriate routines to these novel settings will prove challenging (matching problem).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Continued reliance on established information transfer processes, for example, can prevent acquiring new types of knowledge that may prove critical under drastically altered environmental conditions (Hoang and Rothaermel, 2005;Sampson, 2005).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, relying on experiencebased new product development can result in inertia, which can prove particularly problematic when environmental change is frequent and discontinuous.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Based on information from 30 nonrespondents, the t-tests of group means revealed no significant differences between respondents and nonrespondents on any of the questions (p > 0.05).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Mentzer, Flint, and Hult, 2001 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesWhat the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The means of 4.07 (SD = 0.84) and 4.12 (SD = 0.72), respectively, suggested that the informants were very well informed.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Firms with a strong established new product development capability tend to develop a preference for pursuing incremental product improvements along existing trajectories rather than exploring radically different innovations (Levinthal and Myatt, 1994;Sørensen and Stuart, 2000).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Kor and Mahoney's (2005: 495) finding in the medical instruments industry that 'R&D investments convert into revenue-generating products typically within a period of three years'”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kor and Mahoney, 2005 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For the 48 firms for which relevant secondary data were available, I found a strong positive association with the average of the survey items (r = 0.30; p ≤ 0.001).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites He and Wong, 2004 source
- Not matchedcites Helfat, 1994a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Helfat, 1994b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The results of the t-tests indicated no significant differences (p > 0.05) across means for each of the theoretical constructs between early and late respondents.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Armstrong and Overton, 1977
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Not matched
In the paper
“because new product development activities play a key role in these industries (Centre for European Economic Research, 2004)”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Centre for European Economic Research, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
In the paper
“Given the costs of such investments in developing new product development capability, firms need to deploy this capability repeatedly in order to generate revenues from new or improved products for these expenses to pay off (Helfat and Winter, 2011).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Helfat and Winter, 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both measures were significantly correlated (r = 0.27; p ≤ 0.001), which supported the validity of the perceptual measure.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Anand and Khanna, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hoang and Rothaermel, 2005 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Not matched
In the paper
“Restricted partner selection, however, may prove particularly detrimental when operating in highly dynamic environments where frequently switching alliance partners is often required in order to gain access to the currently most relevant resources (Kandemir, Yaprak, and Cavusgil, 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Kandemir, Yaprak, and Cavusgil, 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
In the paper
“because alliances are frequent in these sectors (Hagedoorn, 1993)”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hagedoorn, 1993 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Whereas new product launches and product overhauls are critical to firms' competitive advantage when contextual conditions change relatively frequently (Song et al., 2005), stable environments often allow firms to sell existing products profitably without much alteration (Hambrick, 1983), making a new product development capability relatively less central to competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Song et al., 2005 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesWhat the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings provide consistent evidence that nonresponse bias is not a problem.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesWhat the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Kruskal Wallis H tests also showed no significant differences in responses of the four informant groups (i.e., heads of R&D, project leaders in R&D, members of the executive board, miscellaneous).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesWhat the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I found no significant differences in either variable (p > 0.05).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Whereas new product launches and product overhauls are critical to firms' competitive advantage when contextual conditions change relatively frequently (Song et al., 2005), stable environments often allow firms to sell existing products profitably without much alteration (Hambrick, 1983), making a new product development capability relatively less central to competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hambrick, 1983 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesWhat the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather than focusing on dynamic contexts only, the study's multi-industry design allowed for contrasting the efficacy of dynamic capabilities in settings with varying dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The U-shaped moderation proposed and tested here implies that both arguments are valid and that the interaction among dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage may be more complex than a simple linear relationship considered by earlier work (e.g., Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesWhat the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings, along with those reported earlier regarding the significant associations between subjective and archival measures, indicated that common method bias was not a serious concern in this study.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Common method bias
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This observation suggests that alliance management capability has a positive impact on competitive advantage at relatively higher levels of environmental dynamism when compared to new product development capability.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“This finding appears to contradict Eisenhardt and Martin's (2000) and Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl's (2007) argument that dynamic capabilities do not confer a competitive advantage in these settings.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesWhat the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results revealed that no single factor explained more than 30 percent of the total variance in the variables, suggesting that common method bias was unlikely to be a serious problem in this study.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Common method bias
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, the study establishes that environmental dynamism plays a key role in the link between dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Results showed that the single-factor model had a significantly worse fit (χ 2 diff = 1,232.33;df diff = 170; p ≤ 0.01).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Common method bias
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites McFarlin and Sweeney, 1992 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Following Fornell and Larcker (1981), I assessed the discriminant validity of the factors in the model and found that the square root of the average variance extracted by the measure of each factor is larger than the absolute value of the correlation of that factor's measure with all measures of other factors in the model, as reported in Table 3.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measurement properties of constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Fornell and Larcker, 1981
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Not matched
In the paper
“This research, thus, heeds calls for empirical studies that 'explicitly compare the effects of similar dynamic capabilities in two or more clearly distinct environmental conditions' (Barreto, 2010: 276).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Barreto, 2010 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“as well as the familiarity/discontinuity argument (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000;Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007), which implies that rulebased, experiential routines may be inappropriate to deal with unfamiliar situations and abrupt change typical for highly dynamic environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, it provides empirical support for the notion that dynamic capabilities, like most ways of organizing, should not be regarded as a universal, one-fits-all solution.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesWhat the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reported results are also robust to dropping business units.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These illustrations, together with the significant quadratic interaction terms, provide empirical support for Hypotheses 1 and 2.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesWhat the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The measures of goodness of fit had satisfactory values (χ 2 = 1,013.80;df = 741; χ 2 /df = 1.37;CFI = 0.95; GFI = 0.87; TLI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.04).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measurement properties of constructs
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 50
- It may state two separate claims as one. 33
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“I received 302 usable responses, reflecting a response rate of 21.8 percent, which is consistent with comparable studies using key informant methodology (e.g., Capron and Mitchell, 2009).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Capron and Mitchell, 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In Data collection and sample (page not provided), Capron and Mitchell describe a survey of senior managers and call its 135 mail responses a reasonable number. The citation supports an example of a comparable senior-manager survey, but the paper does not establish that a 21.8% response rate is typical: it reports 135 responses from about 1,500 mailed surveys and 27 from 90 executive-education participants. The 302 responses and 21.8% rate are the citing author's own figures, not figures attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“One suggests that their effect on competitive advantage is comparatively smaller at low levels of dynamism (Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011;Helfat et al., 2007;Winter, 2003;Zahra et al., 2006;Zollo and Winter, 2002)”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011 source
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In “No ‘rule for riches’ here” (page unavailable), Winter argues that when opportunities for competitively significant change are sparse, the costs of dynamic capabilities may exceed their average benefits. That supports the cited position that their contribution to competitive advantage is smaller in less dynamic environments. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“I acknowledge both the cost argument (Winter, 2003;Zahra et al., 2006;Zollo and Winter, 2002), which suggests that stable environments may not provide sufficient opportunities to cover the costs of developing dynamic capabilities”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In “Contrasting cost structures,” Winter says that a dynamic capability must be exercised to justify its costs; otherwise it is a cost burden. In “No ‘rule for riches’ here,” he adds that when opportunities for significant change are sparse, the added costs may not be matched by benefits. This supports the claim about stable environments. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zahra et al., 2006 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zollo and Winter, 2002 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, this study has adopted a rather narrow definition of dynamic capabilities that focuses on experience-based, rather static routines and excludes more flexible forms of organizational change (consistent with, for example, Pierce et al., 2002;Winter, 2003;Zollo and Winter, 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pierce et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In the passages labelled “Understanding Dynamic Capabilities > Abstract” (page unavailable), Winter describes dynamic capabilities as learned, patterned change roles and distinguishes them from non-routine, opportunistic ad hoc problem solving. That distinction is consistent with the citing study’s stated choice to focus on routines rather than more flexible, ad hoc forms of change. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zollo and Winter, 2002 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was considerable agreement that organizational change routines can support firms' competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Qualitative field interviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Managers disagreed, however, with regard to the relative performance implications under varying degrees of environmental dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Qualitative field interviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, it is important to note that the efficacy of dynamic capabilities decreased significantly when moving from medium to high environmental dynamism, consistent with this article's argument that they exert their relatively strongest positive impact when dynamism is at intermediate levels.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, the findings presented here suggest that dynamic capabilities have more complicated performance effects than previously assumed, ranging from nonsignificant in very stable and very dynamic settings to strongly positive in moderately dynamic environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the control variables, firm size is significantly related to competitive advantage (b = 0.12; p ≤ 0.01).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four supplemental analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > POST-HOC ANALYSES
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Another group of researchers has stressed that routine-based dynamic capabilities are not always an adequate means of change, even if there is a significant need for resource configurations (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000;Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These costs typically arise from various activities involved in devising new resources, reconfiguring existing ones, and combinations thereof.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently, there are two competing views on the effect of environmental dynamism on the link between dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage, with little integration of both perspectives.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One important source of concern is that the presence of dynamic capabilities has frequently been equated with environmental conditions characterized by high dynamism (Zahra, Sapienza, and Davidsson, 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zahra, Sapienza, and Davidsson, 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This can create significant costs because the frequent disruption of the underlying resource base may degrade structural reproducibility and hence decrease an organization's ability to act as a reliable and accountable collective entity.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Traditionally, the literature has assumed a universally positive effect of dynamic capabilities on competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > THEORETICAL BACKGROUND Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Teece and Pisano, 1994 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“These environments typically reward consistent exploitation of existing resources (Leonard-Barton, 1992;Teece, 2007), whereas constantly reconfiguring resources may disrupt the efficiency and value potential of the firm's resources.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While strategic alliances give firms access to resources that lie outside of their boundaries (Das and Teng, 2000), new product development aims at updating the firm's product portfolio (Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Das and Teng, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, these two capabilities are particularly representative for the dynamic capabilities concept, which makes them ideal candidates for this study.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, building and maintaining an alliance management capability usually requires substantial investments in, for example, a dedicated alliance function that oversees and supports alliance operations (Heimeriks and Duysters, 2007;Helfat et al., 2007;Kale, Dyer, and Singh, 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While strategic alliances give firms access to resources that lie outside of their boundaries (Das and Teng, 2000), new product development aims at updating the firm's product portfolio (Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Matching unfamiliar situations with organizational changes proves difficult and may lead either to unresponsiveness or normalization and, in turn, implementation of inappropriate responses.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Organizations with a strong alliance management capability possess routines that support various alliance-related tasks, such as partner identification and interorganizational learning, that facilitate an effective execution of 184 O. Schilke interfirm relationships (Schilke and Goerzen, 2010;Schreiner, Kale, and Corsten, 2009).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More specifically, contexts where change is frequent and 182 O. Schilke unpredictable and the environment shifts uncertainly among states that place novel demands on the organization produce two kinds of problems for dynamic capabilities, the first of which I call a 'matching problem' and the second an 'inertia problem.'”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I expect that when environmental dynamism is high, dynamic capabilities may also have a relatively weak impact on the competitive advantage of firms.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While supporting the institutionalization of alliance management capability, such investments are typically associated with nontrivial costs.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, I recognize that environmental dynamism affects both the extent of opportunities to change and the organizational capacity to exploit these opportunities via routine-based change, thus acknowledging the validity of the arguments from both research camps.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When environmental dynamism is at the intermediate level, there is both a potential for organizational change and the capacity to make good use of the routinized practices that underlie dynamic capabilities.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, I expect the positive effect of dynamic capabilities first to increase but then to diminish as environmental dynamism continues to rise, eventually declining at high levels of dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“First, strategic alliances and new product development are essential means for reconfiguring the organizational resource base.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Das and Teng, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes? Checkable: unclear✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Terjesen, Patel, and Covin (2011), for example, report significant positive associations between environmental dynamism and alliance partner diversity as well as alliance geographic diversity.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Terjesen, Patel, and Covin, 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These environments are dynamic enough to create opportunities for change but stable enough for organizations to recognize reoccurring problem structures and successfully leverage solutions existing in organizational memory.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, I expect that dynamic capabilities have the relatively strongest positive effect on the On the Contingent Value of Dynamic Capabilities 183 competitive advantage of firms when environmental dynamism is intermediate.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although highly dynamic environments provide ample opportunities for resource reconfigurations, the high frequency of novel situations and the necessity to bring about discontinuous organizational change in these settings make the routinebased mechanisms dynamic capabilities rest on comparatively less appropriate, given the matching and inertia problems associated with them.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Given the absence of relevant stimulus knowledge, an out-of-family state may either be ignored or become normalized-that is, treated as if it were a familiar event already encountered and understood in the past-, and potentially inappropriate organizational responses may in turn be matched to these normalized situations (Levinthal and Rerup, 2006;Weick and Sutcliffe, 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The extant empirical literature finds that alliance management capability tends to be positively related to performance (see Sluyts et al., 2011 for a recent review).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sluyts et al., 2011 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Following a patterned stimulus-response logic, they match particular environmental states with certain avenues for organizational change (Levinthal, 2000;Pierce et al., 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Levinthal, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Pierce et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“When possible, survey information obtained from the key informant in the main study was triangulated with complementary data sources to establish its accuracy (Homburg et al., 2012), as described below.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measures
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Homburg et al., 2012 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, when environmental dynamism is at an intermediate level, there is a potential for repeated new product launches that make investments in capability development worthwhile and firms also have the capacity to utilize effectively experiencebased new product development routines to create new, successful products that build on existing solutions.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Firm age has been suggested to influence a firm's competitive advantage (Zahra, Ireland, and Hitt, 2000) as well as the extent of patterned forms of behavior that underpin dynamic capabilities (Helfat and Peteraf, 2003).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Control variables
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It is commonly assumed that such routines lead to new product innovations that in turn result in competitive advantage (Lawson and Samson, 2001).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lawson and Samson, 2001 source
Tests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In line with Zott and Amit (2008), I controlled for the breadth of the firm's product offering and targeted market, as these are key dimensions of a firm's strategy that may affect its competitive advantage and capability development.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Control variables
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zott and Amit, 2008 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, 73.5 percent of the participants in the final dataset had been with their current firm for six years or longer (see Table 1).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Similar to my discussion of alliance management capability, it is important to note that a new product development capability usually entails durable commitment of funds-e.g., to support skilled personnel, specialized facilities, and stateof-the-art equipment (Helfat et al., 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“I found significant associations for growth in sales revenues (r = 0.32, p ≤ 0.01), number of employees (r = 0.28, p ≤ 0.001), and accounting value of assets (r = 0.39, p ≤ 0.001), which lends further credibility to the perceptual competitive advantage measure.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Following the recommendations of DeVellis (2003), the questionnaire items were further refined through in-depth interviews with 13 managers (described above), an item sorting pretest based on Anderson and Gerbing (1991) administered to 15 scholars, and a pretest of the questionnaire conducted with 21 managers.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measures
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites DeVellis, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Anderson and Gerbing, 1991 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Long known as a best-in-class 'new product machine' with highly professionalized innovation routines that allowed for continuously and quickly bringing a large number of products to the market, the firm began to struggle when the environment was beginning to change drastically in the early 1990s.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In the moderately dynamic 186 O. Schilke mainframe sector, for example, Eisenhardt and Tabrizi (1995) find the capability's underlying routines to substantially enhance predictability and effectiveness by coordinating the entire new product development process from initial specification through manufacturing ramp-up whereas such routines were less beneficial in the more dynamic personal computing”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Eisenhardt and Tabrizi, 1995 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Also, firms with strong alliance management capability tend to follow established partner selection protocols (Heimeriks, 2010) and tend to engage in social bonding with their partners (Schreiner et al., 2009), both of which favor repeated ties with the same portfolio of alliance partners.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The values obtained indicate reliable and valid measures of the individual constructs.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measurement properties of constructs
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“My objectives were to establish temporal order of the independent variables (preceding in time) to the dependent variables to enhance causal inference (Biddle, Slavings, and Anderson, 1985) as well as to allow time for the performance effects of dynamic capabilities to materialize (Zahra et al., 2006: 947) and also to reduce the threat of a potential common method bias that could have been present”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“While this sample size may not be considered very large, it is much in line with sample sizes in other strategy studies (Phelan, Ferreira, and Salvador, 2002) and exceeds common recommendations for advanced statistical analyses (e.g., MacCallum et al., 1999).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I obtained an ICC(1) of 0.20, which clearly exceeds the common 0.1 threshold.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Environmental dynamism
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The importance of the industry in which a firm competes as a predictor of firm-level variables is widely recognized in the literature (Dess, Ireland, and Hitt, 1990).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Control variables
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Dess, Ireland, and Hitt, 1990 source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For example, Clark and Fujimoto (1990) find that investing in specialized coordination committees promotes routinized product development.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Clark and Fujimoto, 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Environmental dynamism refers to the volatility and unpredictability of the firm's external environment (Miller and Friesen, 1983).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Miller and Friesen, 1983 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“I obtained an ICC(1) of 0.24, which clearly exceeded Bliese's (1998) 0.1 cutoff.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bliese, 1998 source
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“I used the measure developed by Schilke and Goerzen (2010), which suggests a five-dimensional, second-order structure of the construct, with the underlying dimensions of (1) interorganizational coordination; (2) alliance portfolio coordination; (3) interorganizational learning; (4) alliance proactiveness; and (5) alliance transformation.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schilke and Goerzen, 2010 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At intermediate levels of dynamism, finally, I expect a balance to exist between firms' ability to leverage their alliance management investments and to effectively exploit their experience-based alliance management routines.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In these settings, alliances are frequent enough to justify the costs of developing alliance management capability, and environmental states are similar enough to pursue alliance management in a routinized fashion that strongly builds on past experiences and to make effective use of similar types of alliances.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, although this dataset included a broad range of manufacturing firms representing a variety of industries, care should be exercised in generalizing the results.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As such, both dynamic capabilities have a positive relationship with competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dynamism could alter the fabric of the industry and cause the decay of the firm's resources or render them strategically irrelevant.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In terms of managerial implications, the results suggest that investments in building dynamic capabilities (such as alliance management capability and new product development capability) are strategically justified in many firm environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though some of the routines develop accidentally, others require managers' patient investments and foresight in deciding where and how to build these capabilities as well as how to deploy them to achieve a competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overall, this study thus helps reduce ambiguities regarding the role of environmental dynamism in the dynamic capabilities framework (Zahra et al., 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zahra et al., 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The study's empirical findings help clarify a key contingency that influences the efficacy of dynamic capabilities.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“First, and most importantly, measures of the dependent variable were collected in a separate survey (Podsakoff and Organ, 1986).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Common method bias
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Podsakoff and Organ, 1986 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As noted, dynamic capabilities reconfigure a firm's resource base, and managers need to pay attention to building and exploiting these capabilities in ways that generate a competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The U-shaped moderation proposed and tested here implies that both arguments are valid and that the interaction among dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage may be more complex than a simple linear relationship considered by earlier work (e.g., Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the fact that the sample consists of both firms and business units may be viewed as a limitation, I control for this issue in the empirical analysis as described further below.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“while the other raises doubts about their effectiveness in highly dynamic environments (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000;Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The results of the multi-group analyses lent further support to the hypotheses.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > POST-HOC ANALYSES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Byrne, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“It suggests a less extreme position in that these capabilities can be strategically valuable even in high velocity environments, possibly because an inventory of established change repertories can indirectly facilitate novel action by providing the fodder for new recombinations (Levinthal and Rerup, 2006;Wirtz, Mathieu, and Schilke, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interactions were positive up to the median and then became negative, in line with Hypotheses 1 and 2”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > POST-HOC ANALYSES
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Superior firm performance relative to rivals is a valid empirical indicator of competitive advantage.
“Consistent with this conceptualization, superior firm performance relative to rivals commonly serves as an empirical indicator of competitive advantage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In highly dynamic environments, product lifecycles tend to be comparatively short and technological paradigm shifts relatively frequent.
“In highly dynamic environments, on the other hand, product lifecycles tend to be comparatively short and technological paradigm shifts relatively frequent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The chemicals, machinery, and motor vehicle industries provide a wide variance in environmental dynamism.
“in order to capture a wide variance in the moderating variable environmental dynamism”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ED is a key factor in DC theory (see Schilke, 2014), which suggests that the differential effects of dynamic capabilities on organisational performance (see Helfat and Winter, 2011; Chen et al., 2015) are contingent on the level of dynamism of the organisation's external environment (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000).”
In the citing paper
“The development of this theory is useful to explain how the dynamic capabilities of the organisation may provide value (Aragón -Correa and Sharma, 2003; Schilke, 2014).”
In the citing paper
“Although the dynamic capabilities view has been increasingly used as one of the most important theoretical lenses, the theory has been criticized by some scholars due to poorly defined boundary conditions and its confounding discussion of the effect of dynamic capabilities (e.g., Arend and Bromiley, 2009; Schilke, 2014).”
In the citing paper
“Following Schilke's (2014) arguments, dynamic capabilities have differential performance effects in very stable and very dynamic settings and strongly positive ones in moderately dynamic environments.”
From Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations (2020) · cites this paper as Schilke's (2014)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Discussion reverses the stated moderation shape
MinorThe discussion calls the proposed moderation U-shaped, while the paper repeatedly describes and tests an inverse U-shaped moderation. Those shapes have opposite implications for where the capability effect is strongest.
“The U-shaped moderation proposed and tested here implies that both arguments are valid”
“I propose a novel inverse U-shaped moderating effect”
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
(1991) · Cited by 15,554
Qu, X. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s455 · Cited by 14,759
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach
Wooldridge, J. M. (1999) · Cited by 14,354
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 132 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Arbuckle JL, 2007, Amos 16.0 User's Guide
- Centre for European Economic Research, 2004, ZEW Sector Reports on Innovation 2003
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11 · DOI
- Pierce JL, 2002, The Economics of Change, Choice and Structure: Essays in the Memory of Richard M. Cyert, 81
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0014 · Cited by 1,226
“opportunity for future research not only to investigate the interplay between the two types of dynamic capabilities (also see Heimeriks, Schijven, & Gates,2012; Peteraf et al., 2013; Schilke, 2014a) but to also shed light on their potentially distinct antecedents and their relative performance impacts.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820 · Cited by 958
Big data analytics capabilities: A systematic literature review and research agenda
Mikalef, P., Pappas, I. O., Krogstie, J., & Giannakos, M. (2018) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-017-0362-y · Cited by 888
“Over the past decade, the DCV of the firm has emerged as one of the most influential theoretical perspectives in the study of strategic management (Schilke 2014).”
BackgroundDubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Bryde, D. J., Giannakis, M., Foropon, C., Roubaud, D., & Hazen, B. T. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107599 · Cited by 889
“3 Moderating role of environmental dynamism (ED) The dynamic capabilities view has gained significant attention from management scholars over the past decade (Schilke, 2014; Mikalef et al., 2019 a; Fosso Wamba et al., 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialWamba, S. F., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Akter, S. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.019 · Cited by 840
Metadata
- Authors
- Schilke, O.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schilke, Oliver
- ORCID
- Schilke, Oliver
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-05-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-203
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W1853999331
- Cited by
- 1,264
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 144 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 126.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- dynamic capabilities, competitive advantage, environmental dynamism, inverted U-shaped relationship, alliance management capability, new product development capability, external environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
