The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 6 of the 112 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism
Open accessAbstract
This article suggests that dynamic capabilities can give the firm competitive advantage, but this effect is contingent on the level of dynamism of the firm's external environment. A nonlinear, inverse U ‐shaped moderation is proposed, implying that the relationship between dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage is strongest under intermediate levels of dynamism but comparatively weaker when dynamism is low or high. This proposition is tested using data on alliance management capability and new product development capability, two specific dynamic capabilities widely recognized in prior research. Results based on longitudinal key informant data from 279 firms support the account that these dynamic capabilities are more strongly associated with competitive advantage in moderately dynamic than in stable or highly dynamic environments . Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
46 No full text of the sources · 38 Own interpretation · 15 Own method · 15 Own result · 13 Sources not found · 8 No basis given · 7 Not checked yet · 3 Supported so far · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Other significant costs may result from wrongly estimating the need for resource alterations, which happens when firms use their dynamic capabilities when there is no compelling need for change (Winter, 2003).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In the “Contrasting cost structures” passage (labeled Abstract; page not provided), Winter says that exercising a dynamic capability without a sound occasion for change can be costly. He specifically warns that attempting too much change can impose additional costs when disruption outweighs the value of the novelty achieved. (LLM, conf=0.92)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Second, even when environmental states appear familiar and previously successful organizational responses can be identified, this does not necessarily ensure that the same response will again and again be the most effective one (Jansen et al., 2006;Pierce et al., 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Jansen et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion and Conclusion (page unavailable) reports that exploiting existing products and markets can reduce financial performance in dynamic environments, supporting the point that a response need not remain effective. The paper does not examine apparently familiar environmental states or whether a previously successful response remains the best choice when those states recur. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not matchedcites Pierce et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“New product development and alliancing turned out to be among the most frequent responses.”
- Also stated in: § HYPOTHESES · plain
“Fourth, in the explorative fieldwork, alliance management and new product development were the most frequently named types of routine activities for adapting organizations to changes in the environment (see the Method section).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Qualitative field interviews
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § HYPOTHESES · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results based on longitudinal key informant data from 279 firms support the account that these dynamic capabilities are more strongly associated with competitive advantage in moderately dynamic than in stable or highly dynamic environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Superior firm performance relative to rivals is a valid empirical indicator of competitive advantage.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the negative and highly significant coefficients of the two squared product terms suggest that the relationships between the two dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage vary across different levels of environmental dynamism in a quadratic manner.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the multi-group analyses (see Appendix S1) showed that the positive effects of the two capabilities on competitive advantage were still statistically significant in the high dynamism subgroup.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results indicate significant differences among these settings, underlining the importance of considering the degree of environmental dynamism when making claims about performance implications of dynamic capabilities.”
- Also stated in: § 198 O. Schilke · boosted
“They point to striking differences in the dynamic capabilities-competitive advantage relationship between settings characterized by different degrees of environmental dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 198 O. Schilke · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The analyses indicated that the effects of the two capabilities on competitive advantage are highest when environmental dynamism is moderate and comparatively lower when environmental dynamism is low or high.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proposed inverse U-shaped relationship between dynamic capability and competitive advantage across increasing levels of environmental dynamism is apparent in both graphs.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the regression coefficient of 0.37 indicates a positive and highly significant (p ≤ 0.01) relationship between alliance management capability and competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 50
- It may state two separate claims as one. 33
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“I received 302 usable responses, reflecting a response rate of 21.8 percent, which is consistent with comparable studies using key informant methodology (e.g., Capron and Mitchell, 2009).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Capron and Mitchell, 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In Data collection and sample (page not provided), Capron and Mitchell describe a survey of senior managers and call its 135 mail responses a reasonable number. The citation supports an example of a comparable senior-manager survey, but the paper does not establish that a 21.8% response rate is typical: it reports 135 responses from about 1,500 mailed surveys and 27 from 90 executive-education participants. The 302 responses and 21.8% rate are the citing author's own figures, not figures attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“One suggests that their effect on competitive advantage is comparatively smaller at low levels of dynamism (Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011;Helfat et al., 2007;Winter, 2003;Zahra et al., 2006;Zollo and Winter, 2002)”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011 source
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In “No ‘rule for riches’ here” (page unavailable), Winter argues that when opportunities for competitively significant change are sparse, the costs of dynamic capabilities may exceed their average benefits. That supports the cited position that their contribution to competitive advantage is smaller in less dynamic environments. (LLM, conf=0.89)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“I acknowledge both the cost argument (Winter, 2003;Zahra et al., 2006;Zollo and Winter, 2002), which suggests that stable environments may not provide sufficient opportunities to cover the costs of developing dynamic capabilities”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In “Contrasting cost structures,” Winter says that a dynamic capability must be exercised to justify its costs; otherwise it is a cost burden. In “No ‘rule for riches’ here,” he adds that when opportunities for significant change are sparse, the added costs may not be matched by benefits. This supports the claim about stable environments. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zahra et al., 2006 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zollo and Winter, 2002 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, this study has adopted a rather narrow definition of dynamic capabilities that focuses on experience-based, rather static routines and excludes more flexible forms of organizational change (consistent with, for example, Pierce et al., 2002;Winter, 2003;Zollo and Winter, 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pierce et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites Winter, 2003 source
In the passages labelled “Understanding Dynamic Capabilities > Abstract” (page unavailable), Winter describes dynamic capabilities as learned, patterned change roles and distinguishes them from non-routine, opportunistic ad hoc problem solving. That distinction is consistent with the citing study’s stated choice to focus on routines rather than more flexible, ad hoc forms of change. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zollo and Winter, 2002 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was considerable agreement that organizational change routines can support firms' competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Qualitative field interviews
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Managers disagreed, however, with regard to the relative performance implications under varying degrees of environmental dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Qualitative field interviews
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, it is important to note that the efficacy of dynamic capabilities decreased significantly when moving from medium to high environmental dynamism, consistent with this article's argument that they exert their relatively strongest positive impact when dynamism is at intermediate levels.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, the findings presented here suggest that dynamic capabilities have more complicated performance effects than previously assumed, ranging from nonsignificant in very stable and very dynamic settings to strongly positive in moderately dynamic environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the control variables, firm size is significantly related to competitive advantage (b = 0.12; p ≤ 0.01).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four supplemental analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > POST-HOC ANALYSES
- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Another group of researchers has stressed that routine-based dynamic capabilities are not always an adequate means of change, even if there is a significant need for resource configurations (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000;Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These costs typically arise from various activities involved in devising new resources, reconfiguring existing ones, and combinations thereof.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Currently, there are two competing views on the effect of environmental dynamism on the link between dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage, with little integration of both perspectives.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One important source of concern is that the presence of dynamic capabilities has frequently been equated with environmental conditions characterized by high dynamism (Zahra, Sapienza, and Davidsson, 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zahra, Sapienza, and Davidsson, 2006 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This can create significant costs because the frequent disruption of the underlying resource base may degrade structural reproducibility and hence decrease an organization's ability to act as a reliable and accountable collective entity.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Traditionally, the literature has assumed a universally positive effect of dynamic capabilities on competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > THEORETICAL BACKGROUND Dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Teece and Pisano, 1994 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“These environments typically reward consistent exploitation of existing resources (Leonard-Barton, 1992;Teece, 2007), whereas constantly reconfiguring resources may disrupt the efficiency and value potential of the firm's resources.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While strategic alliances give firms access to resources that lie outside of their boundaries (Das and Teng, 2000), new product development aims at updating the firm's product portfolio (Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Das and Teng, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, these two capabilities are particularly representative for the dynamic capabilities concept, which makes them ideal candidates for this study.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, building and maintaining an alliance management capability usually requires substantial investments in, for example, a dedicated alliance function that oversees and supports alliance operations (Heimeriks and Duysters, 2007;Helfat et al., 2007;Kale, Dyer, and Singh, 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While strategic alliances give firms access to resources that lie outside of their boundaries (Das and Teng, 2000), new product development aims at updating the firm's product portfolio (Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Matching unfamiliar situations with organizational changes proves difficult and may lead either to unresponsiveness or normalization and, in turn, implementation of inappropriate responses.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Organizations with a strong alliance management capability possess routines that support various alliance-related tasks, such as partner identification and interorganizational learning, that facilitate an effective execution of 184 O. Schilke interfirm relationships (Schilke and Goerzen, 2010;Schreiner, Kale, and Corsten, 2009).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More specifically, contexts where change is frequent and 182 O. Schilke unpredictable and the environment shifts uncertainly among states that place novel demands on the organization produce two kinds of problems for dynamic capabilities, the first of which I call a 'matching problem' and the second an 'inertia problem.'”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I expect that when environmental dynamism is high, dynamic capabilities may also have a relatively weak impact on the competitive advantage of firms.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While supporting the institutionalization of alliance management capability, such investments are typically associated with nontrivial costs.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, I recognize that environmental dynamism affects both the extent of opportunities to change and the organizational capacity to exploit these opportunities via routine-based change, thus acknowledging the validity of the arguments from both research camps.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When environmental dynamism is at the intermediate level, there is both a potential for organizational change and the capacity to make good use of the routinized practices that underlie dynamic capabilities.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, I expect the positive effect of dynamic capabilities first to increase but then to diminish as environmental dynamism continues to rise, eventually declining at high levels of dynamism.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“First, strategic alliances and new product development are essential means for reconfiguring the organizational resource base.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > HYPOTHESES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Das and Teng, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Helfat and Raubitschek, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Terjesen, Patel, and Covin (2011), for example, report significant positive associations between environmental dynamism and alliance partner diversity as well as alliance geographic diversity.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Terjesen, Patel, and Covin, 2011 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These environments are dynamic enough to create opportunities for change but stable enough for organizations to recognize reoccurring problem structures and successfully leverage solutions existing in organizational memory.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, I expect that dynamic capabilities have the relatively strongest positive effect on the On the Contingent Value of Dynamic Capabilities 183 competitive advantage of firms when environmental dynamism is intermediate.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although highly dynamic environments provide ample opportunities for resource reconfigurations, the high frequency of novel situations and the necessity to bring about discontinuous organizational change in these settings make the routinebased mechanisms dynamic capabilities rest on comparatively less appropriate, given the matching and inertia problems associated with them.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Given the absence of relevant stimulus knowledge, an out-of-family state may either be ignored or become normalized-that is, treated as if it were a familiar event already encountered and understood in the past-, and potentially inappropriate organizational responses may in turn be matched to these normalized situations (Levinthal and Rerup, 2006;Weick and Sutcliffe, 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The extant empirical literature finds that alliance management capability tends to be positively related to performance (see Sluyts et al., 2011 for a recent review).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sluyts et al., 2011 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Following a patterned stimulus-response logic, they match particular environmental states with certain avenues for organizational change (Levinthal, 2000;Pierce et al., 2002).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > The contingent role of environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Levinthal, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Pierce et al., 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“When possible, survey information obtained from the key informant in the main study was triangulated with complementary data sources to establish its accuracy (Homburg et al., 2012), as described below.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measures
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Homburg et al., 2012 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, when environmental dynamism is at an intermediate level, there is a potential for repeated new product launches that make investments in capability development worthwhile and firms also have the capacity to utilize effectively experiencebased new product development routines to create new, successful products that build on existing solutions.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Firm age has been suggested to influence a firm's competitive advantage (Zahra, Ireland, and Hitt, 2000) as well as the extent of patterned forms of behavior that underpin dynamic capabilities (Helfat and Peteraf, 2003).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Control variables
What the sources say
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It is commonly assumed that such routines lead to new product innovations that in turn result in competitive advantage (Lawson and Samson, 2001).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lawson and Samson, 2001 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In line with Zott and Amit (2008), I controlled for the breadth of the firm's product offering and targeted market, as these are key dimensions of a firm's strategy that may affect its competitive advantage and capability development.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Control variables
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zott and Amit, 2008 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, 73.5 percent of the participants in the final dataset had been with their current firm for six years or longer (see Table 1).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Similar to my discussion of alliance management capability, it is important to note that a new product development capability usually entails durable commitment of funds-e.g., to support skilled personnel, specialized facilities, and stateof-the-art equipment (Helfat et al., 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“I found significant associations for growth in sales revenues (r = 0.32, p ≤ 0.01), number of employees (r = 0.28, p ≤ 0.001), and accounting value of assets (r = 0.39, p ≤ 0.001), which lends further credibility to the perceptual competitive advantage measure.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelationaln = 48 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Following the recommendations of DeVellis (2003), the questionnaire items were further refined through in-depth interviews with 13 managers (described above), an item sorting pretest based on Anderson and Gerbing (1991) administered to 15 scholars, and a pretest of the questionnaire conducted with 21 managers.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measures
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites DeVellis, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Anderson and Gerbing, 1991 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Long known as a best-in-class 'new product machine' with highly professionalized innovation routines that allowed for continuously and quickly bringing a large number of products to the market, the firm began to struggle when the environment was beginning to change drastically in the early 1990s.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Helfat et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In the moderately dynamic 186 O. Schilke mainframe sector, for example, Eisenhardt and Tabrizi (1995) find the capability's underlying routines to substantially enhance predictability and effectiveness by coordinating the entire new product development process from initial specification through manufacturing ramp-up whereas such routines were less beneficial in the more dynamic personal computing”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Eisenhardt and Tabrizi, 1995 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Also, firms with strong alliance management capability tend to follow established partner selection protocols (Heimeriks, 2010) and tend to engage in social bonding with their partners (Schreiner et al., 2009), both of which favor repeated ties with the same portfolio of alliance partners.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The values obtained indicate reliable and valid measures of the individual constructs.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Measurement properties of constructs
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“My objectives were to establish temporal order of the independent variables (preceding in time) to the dependent variables to enhance causal inference (Biddle, Slavings, and Anderson, 1985) as well as to allow time for the performance effects of dynamic capabilities to materialize (Zahra et al., 2006: 947) and also to reduce the threat of a potential common method bias that could have been present”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“While this sample size may not be considered very large, it is much in line with sample sizes in other strategy studies (Phelan, Ferreira, and Salvador, 2002) and exceeds common recommendations for advanced statistical analyses (e.g., MacCallum et al., 1999).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Sample and data for the survey study
What the sources say
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I obtained an ICC(1) of 0.20, which clearly exceeds the common 0.1 threshold.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Environmental dynamism
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The importance of the industry in which a firm competes as a predictor of firm-level variables is widely recognized in the literature (Dess, Ireland, and Hitt, 1990).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Control variables
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Dess, Ireland, and Hitt, 1990 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For example, Clark and Fujimoto (1990) find that investing in specialized coordination committees promotes routinized product development.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > New product development capability and competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Clark and Fujimoto, 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Environmental dynamism refers to the volatility and unpredictability of the firm's external environment (Miller and Friesen, 1983).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Environmental dynamism
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Miller and Friesen, 1983 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“I obtained an ICC(1) of 0.24, which clearly exceeded Bliese's (1998) 0.1 cutoff.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Competitive advantage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bliese, 1998 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“I used the measure developed by Schilke and Goerzen (2010), which suggests a five-dimensional, second-order structure of the construct, with the underlying dimensions of (1) interorganizational coordination; (2) alliance portfolio coordination; (3) interorganizational learning; (4) alliance proactiveness; and (5) alliance transformation.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Schilke and Goerzen, 2010 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At intermediate levels of dynamism, finally, I expect a balance to exist between firms' ability to leverage their alliance management investments and to effectively exploit their experience-based alliance management routines.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In these settings, alliances are frequent enough to justify the costs of developing alliance management capability, and environmental states are similar enough to pursue alliance management in a routinized fashion that strongly builds on past experiences and to make effective use of similar types of alliances.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Alliance management capability and competitive advantage
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, although this dataset included a broad range of manufacturing firms representing a variety of industries, care should be exercised in generalizing the results.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As such, both dynamic capabilities have a positive relationship with competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > METHOD AND RESULTS
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dynamism could alter the fabric of the industry and cause the decay of the firm's resources or render them strategically irrelevant.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In terms of managerial implications, the results suggest that investments in building dynamic capabilities (such as alliance management capability and new product development capability) are strategically justified in many firm environments.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though some of the routines develop accidentally, others require managers' patient investments and foresight in deciding where and how to build these capabilities as well as how to deploy them to achieve a competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overall, this study thus helps reduce ambiguities regarding the role of environmental dynamism in the dynamic capabilities framework (Zahra et al., 2006).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zahra et al., 2006 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The study's empirical findings help clarify a key contingency that influences the efficacy of dynamic capabilities.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“First, and most importantly, measures of the dependent variable were collected in a separate survey (Podsakoff and Organ, 1986).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > Common method bias
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Podsakoff and Organ, 1986 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As noted, dynamic capabilities reconfigure a firm's resource base, and managers need to pay attention to building and exploiting these capabilities in ways that generate a competitive advantage.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The U-shaped moderation proposed and tested here implies that both arguments are valid and that the interaction among dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage may be more complex than a simple linear relationship considered by earlier work (e.g., Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Drnevich and Kriauciunas, 2011 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the fact that the sample consists of both firms and business units may be viewed as a limitation, I control for this issue in the empirical analysis as described further below.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“while the other raises doubts about their effectiveness in highly dynamic environments (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000;Schreyögg and Kliesch-Eberl, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The results of the multi-group analyses lent further support to the hypotheses.”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > POST-HOC ANALYSES
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Byrne, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“It suggests a less extreme position in that these capabilities can be strategically valuable even in high velocity environments, possibly because an inventory of established change repertories can indirectly facilitate novel action by providing the fodder for new recombinations (Levinthal and Rerup, 2006;Wirtz, Mathieu, and Schilke, 2007).”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interactions were positive up to the median and then became negative, in line with Hypotheses 1 and 2”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > POST-HOC ANALYSES
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Superior firm performance relative to rivals is a valid empirical indicator of competitive advantage.
“Consistent with this conceptualization, superior firm performance relative to rivals commonly serves as an empirical indicator of competitive advantage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In highly dynamic environments, product lifecycles tend to be comparatively short and technological paradigm shifts relatively frequent.
“In highly dynamic environments, on the other hand, product lifecycles tend to be comparatively short and technological paradigm shifts relatively frequent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The chemicals, machinery, and motor vehicle industries provide a wide variance in environmental dynamism.
“in order to capture a wide variance in the moderating variable environmental dynamism”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ED is a key factor in DC theory (see Schilke, 2014), which suggests that the differential effects of dynamic capabilities on organisational performance (see Helfat and Winter, 2011; Chen et al., 2015) are contingent on the level of dynamism of the organisation's external environment (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000).”
In the citing paper
“The development of this theory is useful to explain how the dynamic capabilities of the organisation may provide value (Aragón -Correa and Sharma, 2003; Schilke, 2014).”
In the citing paper
“Although the dynamic capabilities view has been increasingly used as one of the most important theoretical lenses, the theory has been criticized by some scholars due to poorly defined boundary conditions and its confounding discussion of the effect of dynamic capabilities (e.g., Arend and Bromiley, 2009; Schilke, 2014).”
In the citing paper
“Following Schilke's (2014) arguments, dynamic capabilities have differential performance effects in very stable and very dynamic settings and strongly positive ones in moderately dynamic environments.”
From Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations (2020) · cites this paper as Schilke's (2014)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > 198 O. Schilke
“The U-shaped moderation proposed and tested here implies that both arguments are valid”
§ ON THE CONTINGENT VALUE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE NONLINEAR MODERATING EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM > INTRODUCTION
“I propose a novel inverse U-shaped moderating effect”
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
(1991) · Cited by 15,554
Qu, X. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s455 · Cited by 14,759
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach
Wooldridge, J. M. (1999) · Cited by 14,354
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed
Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., Black, W. C., & Hair, J. F. (2006) · Cited by 9,807
Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods
Walker, E., Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Muller, K. E. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270375 · Cited by 8,538
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250141009 · Cited by 7,646
Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780 · Cited by 6,963
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Sample size in factor analysis.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.1.84 · Cited by 5,497
Understanding dynamic capabilities
Winter, S. G. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.318 · Cited by 5,315
Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Third Edition
Byrne, B. M. (2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315757421 · Cited by 4,653
The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.332 · Cited by 4,553
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393807 · Cited by 4,285
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020 · cited 1×
“…capabilities are not entirely fixed as people perform them across time and space, interpret them subjectively, and ultimately introduce variations (Feldman and Pentland, 2003), Winter (2003) emphasizes that there are clear limits to the degree to which they reflect flexible action with modest…”
BackgroundThe Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction
TEECE, D., & PISANO, G. (1994) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a · Cited by 4,013
Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments
Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393080 · Cited by 3,915
Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 · Cited by 3,737 · cited 1×
“To capture the firm's new product development capability, I relied on the measurement items introduced by He and Wong (2004).”
MethodJansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576 · Cited by 3,705
Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23466005 · Cited by 3,701
(2007) · Cited by 3,434
Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression.
Richardson, S. T., Jacard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1991) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348747 · Cited by 3,310
Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x · Cited by 3,152
What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.502 · Cited by 3,078
Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556420 · Cited by 2,893
A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)00037-9 · Cited by 2,876
Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250030102 · Cited by 2,758
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.2.136 · Cited by 2,672
CONDUCTING INTERORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH USING KEY INFORMANTS.
KUMAR, N., STERN, L. W., & ANDERSON, J. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256824 · Cited by 2,467
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393701 · Cited by 2,426 · cited 1×
“In the moderately dynamic mainframe sector, for example, Eisenhardt and Tabrizi (1995) find the capability's underlying routines to substantially enhance predictability and effectiveness by coordinating the entire new product development process from initial specification through manufacturing…”
BackgroundAdaptation on Rugged Landscapes
Levinthal, D. A. (1997) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934 · Cited by 2,254
Hagedoorn, J. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140505 · Cited by 2,227
Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming
Byrne, B. M. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203807644 · Cited by 2,063
Strategy‐making and environment: The third link
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250040304 · Cited by 1,986
Handbook of Organization Studies
Hubbell, L., Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. R. (1997) · Public Productivity & Management Review · doi:10.2307/3380686 · Cited by 1,983
Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future
Barreto, I. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309350776 · Cited by 1,948
Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities?
Collis, D. J. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150910 · Cited by 1,897
Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation
Sørensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666980 · Cited by 1,862
Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.248 · Cited by 1,803
Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression
Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003) · doi:10.4135/9781412984522 · Cited by 1,797
The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance
Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.642 · Cited by 1,731
McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256489 · Cited by 1,704
Unraveling the resource-based tangle
Peteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. B. (2003) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.1126 · Cited by 1,661
DEVELOPING INNOVATION CAPABILITY IN ORGANISATIONS: A DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES APPROACH
LAWSON, B., & SAMSON, D. (2001) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919601000427 · Cited by 1,581
The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities
(2001) · doi:10.1093/0199248540.001.0001 · Cited by 1,567
Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (N) ever - changing world
Helfat, C. E., & Winter, S. G. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.955 · Cited by 1,439
Cross-Sectional versus longitudinal survey research: concepts, findings, and guidelines
Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261 · Cited by 1,305
Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2009) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127008100133 · Cited by 1,121
Organizational Adaptation: Strategic Choice and Environmental Determinism
Hrebiniak, L. G., & Joyce, W. F. (1985) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392666 · Cited by 1,090
Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view
Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.252 · Cited by 1,086
Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer-Supplier Relationships
Jap, S. D. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379903600405 · Cited by 1,077
When Does Trust Matter to Alliance Performance?
Krishnan, R., Martín, X., & Noorderhaven, N. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22798171 · Cited by 1,053
Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2001) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.2.1.18253 · Cited by 1,041
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.732 · Cited by 1,038
Schreyögg, G., & Kliesch‐Eberl, M. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.613 · Cited by 1,036
Logistics Service Quality as a Segment-Customized Process
Mentzer, J. T., Flint, D. J., & Hult, G. T. M. (2001) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.4.82.18390 · Cited by 1,009
How Information Management Capability Influences Firm Performance1
Mithas, S., Ramasubbu, N., & Sambamurthy, V. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043496 · Cited by 937
The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance
Hagedoorn, J., & Schakenraad, J. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150404 · Cited by 925
Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention
Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0196 · Cited by 925
Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.450 · Cited by 844
Li, J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.665 · Cited by 785
The Effect of General and Partner-Specific Alliance Experience on Joint R&D Project Performance
Hoang, H., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.16928417 · Cited by 784
Why do ‘great minds’ think alike?: antecedents of team member schema agreement
Rentsch, J. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (2001) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.81 · Cited by 771
Organizational antecedents of second‐order competences
Danneels, E. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.684 · Cited by 753
Douglas, T. J., & Judge, W. Q. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069343 · Cited by 751
Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0197 · Cited by 744
High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency Approach.
Hambrick, D. C. (1983) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255916 · Cited by 728
The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability LifecyclesPreprint
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.386620 · Cited by 685
Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. P. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.882 · Cited by 681
Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation
Bliese, P. D. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819814001 · Cited by 636
Reading the wind: how middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers
Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., NEILL, R. M. O., Hayes, E. L., & Wierba, E. E. (1997) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199705)18:5 · Cited by 629
Scale development: Theory and applications
Shannon, D. (1993) · Evaluation Practice · doi:10.1016/0886-1633(93)90012-e · Cited by 619
Subramaniam, M., & Venkatraman, N. V. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.163 · Cited by 599
Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2009) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.791 · Cited by 589
Industry Effects and Strategic Management Research
Dess, G. G., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (1990) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639001600102 · Cited by 565
Heimeriks, K. H., & Duysters, G. (2007) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00639.x · Cited by 530
The role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy
Weerawardena, J. (2003) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254032000096766 · Cited by 513
What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success?
Schreiner, M., Kale, P., & Corsten, D. (2009) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.790 · Cited by 507
How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm‐level performance
Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.459 · Cited by 497
Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer-Supplier Relationships
Jap, S. D. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152000 · Cited by 486
Evolutionary Trajectories in Petroleum Firm R&D
Helfat, C. E. (1994) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.12.1720 · Cited by 466
Alliance Management Capability: An Investigation of the Construct and Its Measurement
Schilke, O., & Goerzen, A. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310362102 · Cited by 449
Self-citationAlliance portfolio diversity and firm performance
Jiang, R. J., Tao, Q. T., & Santoro, M. D. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.869 · Cited by 447
Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances
Sampson, R. C. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.483 · Cited by 443
Conceptualizing and Measuring the Organizational Environment: A Multidimensional Approach
Sharfman, M. P., & Dean, J. W. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700403 · Cited by 436
Capron, L., & Mitchell, W. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0328 · Cited by 430
An Evolutionary Model of Organizational Performance
Barnett, W. P., Greve, H. R., & Park, D. Y. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150903 · Cited by 418
Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: spare change, everyone?
Arend, R. J., & Bromiley, P. (2009) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127008100132 · Cited by 413
WHAT EXECUTIVES NOTICE: ACCURATE PERCEPTIONS IN TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS.
Sutcliffe, K. M. (1994) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256677 · Cited by 403
Organizational Adaptation and Environmental Selection-Interrelated Processes of Change
Levinthal, D. A. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.140 · Cited by 401
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINANTS AND INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL MODERATORS OF ALLIANCE USE.
DICKSON, P. H., & WEAVER, K. M. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256888 · Cited by 381
Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management
Easterby-Smith, M. 2., & Lyles, M. A. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119207245 · Cited by 355
The power of product integrity
(1991) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/0737-6782(91)90037-y · Cited by 346
Co-Evolution of Capabilities and Industry: The Evolution of Mutual Fund Processing
Levinthal, D., & Myatt, J. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150905 · Cited by 343
Gruber, M. B., Heinemann, F., Brettel, M., & Hungeling, S. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.865 · Cited by 340
Robson, M. J., Katsikeas, C. S., & Bello, D. C. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0329 · Cited by 335
Interfirm Cooperation and Customer Orientation
Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2003) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.40.4.421.19388 · Cited by 312
Firm-Specificity in Corporate Applied R&D
Helfat, C. E. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.173 · Cited by 295
Alliance Orientation: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Impact on Market Performance
Kandemir, D. (2006) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070305285953 · Cited by 292
What Drives Key Informant Accuracy?
Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., Reimann, M., & Schilke, O. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.09.0174 · Cited by 276
Self-citationThe impact of diversification strategy on risk‐return performance
Chang, Y., & Thomas, H. (1989) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250100306 · Cited by 224
Comparing alliance network structure across industries: observations and explanations
Rosenkopf, L., & Schilling, M. A. (2007) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.33 · Cited by 222
How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness?
Su, Y.-S., Tsang, E. W. K., & Peng, M. W. (2008) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-008-9114-3 · Cited by 187
Terjesen, S., Patel, P. C., & Covin, J. G. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.07.004 · Cited by 158
The first twenty years of the Strategic Management Journal
Phelan, S. E., Ferreira, M., & Salvador, R. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.268 · Cited by 131
Building capabilities to manage strategic alliances
Sluyts, K., Matthyssens, P., Martens, R., & Streukens, S. (2011) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.022 · Cited by 120
Strategy in High-Velocity Environments
Wirtz, B. W., Mathieu, A., & Schilke, O. (2007) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2007.06.002 · Cited by 119
Self-citationOrganizational Capabilities in Complex Worlds
Levinthal, D. A. (2001) · The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities · doi:10.1093/0199248540.003.0014 · Cited by 112
Evolutionary Patterns of Flexible Automation and Performance: A Longitudinal Study
Boyer, K. K. (1999) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.6.824 · Cited by 100
Social Capital as a Microlevel Origin of Organizational Capabilities
Kemper, J., Schilke, O. S., & Brettel, M. (2013) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12004 · Cited by 99
Self-citationCreating competitive advantage
(2008) · Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology · doi:10.1108/aeat.2008.12780baf.001 · Cited by 90
Heimeriks, K. H. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.982091 · Cited by 88
Dynamic capabilities, competence and the behavioral theory of the firm
Pierce, J. L., Boerner, C. S., & Teece, D. J. (2008) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789812834478_0003 · Cited by 72
Confident or Competent? How to Avoid Superstitious Learning in Alliance Portfolios
Heimeriks, K. H. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.10.004 · Cited by 70
Strategy and the Business Landscape: text and cases
Ghemawat, P., Collis, D. J., Pisano, G. P., et al. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 69
The Human Side of Dynamic Capabilities: A Holistic Learning Model
Verona, G., & Zollo, M. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119207245.ch24 · Cited by 16
Panel Studies and Causal Inference
Biddle, B. J., Slavings, R. L., & Anderson, D. S. (1985) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/002188638502100108 · Cited by 14
Dynamic capabilities and strategic management
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11
Baum (2000) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3
Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (n)ever-changing world
Helfat, C. E. (2012) · Strategic Direction · doi:10.1108/sd.2012.05628caa.005
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1993) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90313-5
Dynamic capabilities, competence and the behavioral theory of the firm
Pierce, J. L., Boerner, C. S., & Teece, D. J. (2002) · The Economics of Choice, Change and Organization · doi:10.4337/9781035335503.00012
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Arbuckle JL, 2007, Amos 16.0 User's Guide
- Centre for European Economic Research, 2004, ZEW Sector Reports on Innovation 2003
- 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11 · DOI
- Pierce JL, 2002, The Economics of Change, Choice and Structure: Essays in the Memory of Richard M. Cyert, 81
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0014 · Cited by 1,226
“opportunity for future research not only to investigate the interplay between the two types of dynamic capabilities (also see Heimeriks, Schijven, & Gates,2012; Peteraf et al., 2013; Schilke, 2014a) but to also shed light on their potentially distinct antecedents and their relative performance impacts.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820 · Cited by 958
Big data analytics capabilities: A systematic literature review and research agenda
Mikalef, P., Pappas, I. O., Krogstie, J., & Giannakos, M. (2018) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-017-0362-y · Cited by 888
“Over the past decade, the DCV of the firm has emerged as one of the most influential theoretical perspectives in the study of strategic management (Schilke 2014).”
BackgroundDubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Bryde, D. J., Giannakis, M., Foropon, C., Roubaud, D., & Hazen, B. T. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107599 · Cited by 889
“3 Moderating role of environmental dynamism (ED) The dynamic capabilities view has gained significant attention from management scholars over the past decade (Schilke, 2014; Mikalef et al., 2019 a; Fosso Wamba et al., 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialWamba, S. F., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Akter, S. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.019 · Cited by 840
Metadata
- Authors
- Schilke, O.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schilke, Oliver
- ORCID
- Schilke, Oliver
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-05-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-203
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W1853999331
- Cited by
- 1,264
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 144 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 137 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 126.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- dynamic capabilities, competitive advantage, environmental dynamism, inverted U-shaped relationship, alliance management capability, new product development capability, external environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
