The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a theory of ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
Research Summary: The recent surge of interest in “ecosystems” in strategy research and practice has mainly focused on what ecosystems are and how they operate. We complement this literature by considering when and why ecosystems emerge, and what makes them distinct from other governance forms. We argue that modularity enables ecosystem emergence as it allows a set of distinct yet interdependent organizations to coordinate without full hierarchical fiat. We show how ecosystems address multilateral dependences based on various types of complementarities—supermodular or unique, unidirectional or bidirectional—which determine the ecosystem's value‐add. We argue that at the core of ecosystems lie nongeneric complementarities, and the creation of sets of roles that face similar rules. We conclude with implications for mainstream strategy and suggestions for future research. Managerial Summary: We consider what makes ecosystems different from other business constellations, including markets, alliances, or hierarchically managed supply chains. Ecosystems, we posit, are interacting organizations, enabled by modularity, not hierarchically managed, bound together by the nonredeployability of their collective investment elsewhere. Ecosystems add value as they allow managers to coordinate their multilateral dependence through sets of roles that face similar rules, thus obviating the need to enter into customized contractual agreements with each partner. We explain how different types of complementarities (unique or supermodular, generic or specific, uni‐ or bi‐directional) shape ecosystems and offer a “theory of ecosystems” that can explain what they are, when they emerge, and why alignment occurs. Finally, we outline the critical factors affecting ecosystem emergence, evolution, and success—or failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A significant fraction of these multihoming investments tends to be co-specialized, such that they cannot be easily redeployed or re-used on other platforms (Jacobides et al. 2018), increasing the risk of holdup and the costs of multihoming to a distant platform.”
From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Jacobides et al. 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Here the focal platform actor requires specific capabilities to form and orchestrate the surrounding ecosystem (Helfat & Raubitschek, 2018), enforces governance principles and fosters generativity, allowing the complementors to undertake discrete actions to contribute to the platforms' value proposition (Adner, 2017;Jacobides et al., 2018;Teece, 2018).”
From Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems (2023) · cites this paper as Jacobides et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.1255632 · Cited by 12,810
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
(1986) · The Antitrust Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0003603x8603100308 · Cited by 10,978
Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness
Uzzi, B. (1997) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393808 · Cited by 9,853
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Teece, D. J. (1993) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)90063-n · Cited by 7,243
Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/154247603322493212 · Cited by 5,642
Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm
Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261729 · Cited by 5,397
Design Rules: The Power of Modularity
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001 · Cited by 3,504
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Brandenburger A. M., 1996, Co‐opetition: A revolutionary mindset that combines competition and cooperation in the marketplace
- Dewey J., 1999, The essential Dewey
- 10.2307/259056 · DOI
- James W., 1975, The meaning of truth
- Teece D. J., 2014, Entry in Palgrave Encyclopedia of Management
- 10.2307/20159628 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,002
Understanding token-based ecosystems – a taxonomy of blockchain-based business models of start-ups
Tönnissen, S., Beinke, J. H., & Teuteberg, F. (2020) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-020-00396-6 · Cited by 93
Digital Platform for Circular Economy in AEC Industry
Kovačić, I., Honic, M., & Srećković, M. (2020) · Engineering Project Organization Journal · doi:10.25219/epoj.2020.00107 · Cited by 92
Digital transformation of business ecosystems: Evidence from the Korean pop industry
Tan, F. T. C., Ondruš, J., Tan, B. C. C., & Oh, J. (2020) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12285 · Cited by 103
Making sense of the sharing economy: a business model innovation perspective
Sanasi, S., Ghezzi, A., Cavallo, A., & Rangone, A. (2020) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2020.1719058 · Cited by 90
Jiao, H., Yang, J., & Cui, Y. H. (2021) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-01-2021-0046 · Cited by 102
Pingali, S. R., Singha, S., Arunachalam, S., & Pedada, K. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113973 · Cited by 155
Lei, S., Shi, Q., Parida, V., & Jovanovic, M. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114463 · Cited by 128
Sharing economy platform firms and their resource orchestration approaches
Zeng, J., Tavalaei, M. M., & Khan, Z. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.054 · Cited by 90
Ecosystem effectuation: creating new value through open innovation during a pandemic
Radziwon, A., Bogers, M. L. A. M., Chesbrough, H. W., & Minssen, T. (2021) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12512 · Cited by 88
Suuronen, S., Ukko, J., Eskola, R., Semken, R. S., & Rantanen, H. (2022) · CIRP - Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.02.016 · Cited by 76
The Next Frontiers of Digital Innovation Research
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., Kallinikos, J., Gregory, R. W., Burtch, G., Chatterjee, S., & Sarker, S. (2024) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2024.editorial.v35.n4 · Cited by 90
Driving the electric bandwagon: The dynamics of incumbents' sustainable innovation
Bohnsack, R., Kolk, A., Pinkse, J., & Bidmon, C. M. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2430 · Cited by 90
Be alert to dangers: Collapse and avoidance strategies of platform ecosystems
Duan, W., & Li, C. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113869 · Cited by 89
SMEs and open innovation: Challenges and costs of engagement
Costa, A., Crupi, A., De Marco, C. E., & Di Minin, A. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122731 · Cited by 104
Business ecosystem research agenda: more dynamic, more embedded, and more internationalized
Rong, K., Lin, Y., Li, B., Burström, T., Butel, L., & Jiang, Y. (2018) · Asian Business & Management · doi:10.1057/s41291-018-0038-6 · Cited by 89
How to Develop a Digital Ecosystem – a Practical Framework
Valdez-de-Leon, O. (2019) · Technology Innovation Management Review · doi:10.22215/timreview/1260 · Cited by 86
Thomson, L., Kamalaldin, A., Sjödin, D., & Parida, V. (2021) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-020-00717-3 · Cited by 97
Innovation ecosystems and national talent competitiveness: A country-based comparison using fsQCA
Huang, Y., Li, K., & Li, P. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122733 · Cited by 86
The persistence of platforms: The role of network, platform, and complementor attributes
McIntyre, D., Srinivasan, A., & Chintakananda, A. (2020) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2020.101987 · Cited by 87
Energy communities and their ecosystems: A comparison of France and the Netherlands
Vernay, A., & Sebi, C. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120123 · Cited by 87
A matter of definition: Criteria for digital ecosystems
Koch, M. A., Krohmer, D., Naab, M., Rost, D., & Trapp, M. (2022) · Digital Business · doi:10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100027 · Cited by 101
Scale-ups and scaling in an international business context
Tippmann, E., Ambos, T. C., Giudice, M. D., Monaghan, S., & Ringov, D. P. (2022) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101397 · Cited by 85
Platform diffusion at temporary gatherings: Social coordination and ecosystem emergence
Fang, T. P., Wu, A., & Clough, D. R. (2021) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3230 · Cited by 85
de Prieëlle, F., de Reuver, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2020.2966024 · Cited by 87
A paradox within the paradox of openness: The knowledge leveraging conundrum in open innovation
Ritala, P., & Stefan, I. (2021) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.01.011 · Cited by 73
Regional entrepreneurial ecosystems: learning from forest ecosystems
O'Connor, A. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (2022) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-022-00623-8 · Cited by 95
Circular ecosystem management: Orchestrating ecosystem value proposition and configuration
Gomes, L. A. D. V., de Faria, A. M., Braz, A. C., de Mello, A. M., Borini, F. M., & Ometto, A. R. (2022) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108725 · Cited by 85
Gifford, E., McKelvey, M., & Sæmundsson, R. J. (2020) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2020.1856047 · Cited by 92
Microbial biodiversity and plant functional trait interactions in multifunctional ecosystems
Nizamani, M. M., Hughes, A. C., Qureshi, S., Zhang, Q., Tarafder, E., Das, D., Acharya, K., Wang, Y. Y., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105515 · Cited by 89
Wei, F., Feng, N., Yang, S., & Zhao, Q. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121431 · Cited by 81
Orchestrating innovation networks: Alignment and orchestration profile approach
Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen, P., Möller, K., & Nätti, S. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.084 · Cited by 83
Hao, X., Liu, G., Zhang, X., & Dong, L. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121627 · Cited by 77
Kuhn, K. M., Meijerink, J., & Keegan, A. (2021) · Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management · doi:10.1108/s0742-730120210000039001 · Cited by 93
Schäper, T., Jung, C., Foege, J. N., Bogers, M., Fainshmidt, S., & Nüesch, S. (2023) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104764 · Cited by 79
Studying Platforms and Cultural Production: Methods, Institutions, and Practices
Nieborg, D. B., Duffy, B. E., & Poell, T. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120943273 · Cited by 101
Abootorabi, H., Wiklund, J., Johnson, A. R., & Miller, C. D. (2021) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106143 · Cited by 81
Xiao, L., Zhang, L., & Cao, J. (2022) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2023.101738 · Cited by 94
Regulatory standards and consequences for industry architecture: The case of UK Open Banking
Dinçkol, D., Özcan, P., & Zachariadis, M. (2023) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104760 · Cited by 93
A Taxonomy for Data Ecosystems
Gelhaar, J., Groß, T., & Otto, B. (2021) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.739 · Cited by 78
Burford, N. J., Shipilov, A. V., & Furr, N. (2021) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3318 · Cited by 79
Regulating platforms and ecosystems: an introduction
Jacobides, M. G., & Lianos, I. (2021) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtab060 · Cited by 80
Self-citationRevisiting IoT definitions: A framework towards comprehensive use
Sorri, K., Mustafee, N., & Seppänen, M. (2022) · Technological forecasting & social change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121623 · Cited by 58
Keegan, A. E., & Meijerink, J. (2022) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22120 · Cited by 88
Tian, J., Vanderstraeten, J., Matthyssens, P., & Lei, S. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.10.007 · Cited by 82
Fostering circular economy through open innovation: Insights from multiple case study
Perotti, F. A., Bargoni, A., Bernardi, P. D., & Rózsa, Z. (2024) · Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.12657 · Cited by 77
Exploring regional innovation ecosystems: an empirical study in China
Rong, K., Lin, Y., Yu, J., Zhang, Y., & Radziwon, A. (2020) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2020.1830042 · Cited by 82
From ego‐systems to open innovation ecosystems: A process model of inter‐firm openness
Alam, M. A., Rooney, D., & Taylor, M. (2022) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12615 · Cited by 82
Zabel, C., O’Brien, D., & Natzel, J. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122562 · Cited by 85
Goodwin, N., Stein, V. K., & Amelung, V. E. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69262-9_1 · Cited by 84
Xue, J., & Liu, M. T. (2022) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-11-2021-0822 · Cited by 75
Slicing the cake without baking it: Opportunistic platform entry strategies in digital markets
Karhu, K., & Ritala, P. (2020) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2020.101988 · Cited by 82
An exploration of eLearning adoption in the educational ecosystem
Rodrigues, M. A. D. S., Chimenti, P. C. P. D. S., & Nogueira, A. R. R. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10276-3 · Cited by 88
Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises
Gomes, L. A. D. V., Chaparro, X. A. F., Facin, A. L. F., & Borini, F. M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120950 · Cited by 92
Regional differences in impact investment: a theory of impact investing ecosystems
Roundy, P. T. (2019) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/srj-11-2018-0302 · Cited by 74
Bosco, B. D., Mazzucchelli, A., Chierici, R., & Gregorio, A. D. (2019) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-019-00618-0 · Cited by 73
Innovation Ecosystem Research: Emerging Trends and Future Research
Gu, Y., Hu, L., Zhang, H., & Hou, C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132011458 · Cited by 89
Leveraging Value Creation to Drive the Growth of B2B Platforms
Anderson, E. G., Lopez, J., & PARKER, G. G. (2021) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13866 · Cited by 73
The Chinese platform business group: an alternative to the Silicon Valley model?
Jia, K., & Kenney, M. F. (2021) · Journal of Chinese Governance · doi:10.1080/23812346.2021.1877446 · Cited by 72
Innovation EcosystemsPreprint
Thomas, L. D. W., & Autio, E. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3476925 · Cited by 78
Schneider, S., Leyer, M., & Tate, M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2020.2972037 · Cited by 73
Wulf, J., & Blohm, I. (2020) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2019.1705514 · Cited by 80
Digital ecosystems and their implications for competitive strategy
Subramaniam, M. (2020) · Journal of Organization Design · doi:10.1186/s41469-020-00073-0 · Cited by 70
Developing a Theory of the Firm for the 21st Century
Alvarez, S., Zander, U., Barney, J. B., & Afuah, A. N. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2020.0372 · Cited by 72
The Institutional Logic of Digitalization
Schildt, H. A. (2022) · Research in the sociology of organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20220000083010 · Cited by 86
Zhang, C., & Wang, Y. (2024) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103104 · Cited by 72
Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research
Velt, H., Torkkeli, L., & Laine, I. (2020) · Journal of Business Ecosystems · doi:10.4018/jbe.20200701.oa1 · Cited by 72
Chatterjee, S., Sarker, S., Lee, M. J., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A. R. (2020) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12320 · Cited by 91
Move fast and break things: Reassessing IB research in the light of the digital revolution
Birkinshaw, J. (2022) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1002/gsj.1427 · Cited by 70
Addo, A. (2022) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962221088333 · Cited by 87
Zhao, R., Li, P., Zhao, Y., & Feng, Y. (2024) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107418 · Cited by 70
Profiting from innovation when digital business ecosystems emerge: A control point perspective
Bohnsack, R., Rennings, M., Block, C., & Bröring, S. (2024) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2024.104961 · Cited by 89
Towards High Impact Smart Cities: a Universal Architecture Based on Connected Intelligence Spaces
Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Mora, L., Panori, A., & Sefertzi, E. (2021) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-021-00767-0 · Cited by 76
Muthukannan, P., Tan, B. C. C., Tan, F. T. C., & Leong, C. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102403 · Cited by 82
Fast, V., Schnurr, D., & Wohlfarth, M. (2021) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962221114394 · Cited by 89
Digital transformation and value chains: Introduction
Butollo, F., Gereffi, G., Yang, C., & Krzywdzinski, M. (2022) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/glob.12388 · Cited by 68
The streaming industry and the platform economy: An analysis
Chalaby, J. K. (2023) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437231210439 · Cited by 115
Yuan, N., & Li, M. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123508 · Cited by 68
Research trends in innovation ecosystem and circular economy
Alka, T. A., Raghu Raman, R., & Suresh, M. (2024) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00535-5 · Cited by 93
Hilbolling, S., Berends, H., Deken, F., & Tuertscher, P. (2021) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12555 · Cited by 71
Innovation, upgrading, and governance in cross-sectoral global value chains: the case of smartphones
Lee, J., & Gereffi, G. (2020) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtaa062 · Cited by 67
Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon. com
PARKER, G. G., Petropoulos, G., & Alstyne, M. V. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.1093/icc/dtab048 · Cited by 67
Randhawa, K., Wilden, R., & Akaka, M. A. (2022) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.03.016 · Cited by 76
The transformation of supply chain collaboration and design through Industry 4.0
Veile, J., Schmidt, M.-C., Müller, J., & Voigt, K. (2022) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2022.2148638 · Cited by 62
Architecture vs. ecosystem perspectives: Reflections on digital innovation
Nambisan, S. (2018) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.04.003 · Cited by 69
Inoue, Y. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120652 · Cited by 65
Responsible innovation with digital platforms: Cases in India and Canada
Ahuja, S., Chan, Y. E., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2022) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12378 · Cited by 65
Siegel, D. S., Bogers, M. L. A. M., Jennings, P. D., & Xue, L. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104646 · Cited by 65
Managing multi-tiered innovation ecosystems
Reiter, A., Stonig, J., & Frankenberger, K. (2023) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104905 · Cited by 69
Primario, S., Rippa, P., & Secundo, G. (2024) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100473 · Cited by 71
Esports extension of a football brand: stakeholder co-creation in action?
Bertschy, M., Mühlbacher, H., & Desbordes, M. (2019) · European Sport Management Quarterly · doi:10.1080/16184742.2019.1689281 · Cited by 72
Digital transformation in companies: Strategic analysis, drivers and models
Ценжарик, М. К., Krylova, Y., & Steshenko, V. (2020) · St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies · doi:10.21638/spbu05.2020.303 · Cited by 64
Digital Platform Ecosystems for Sustainable Innovation: Toward a New Meta-Organizational Model?
Calabrese, M., Sala, A. L., Fuller, R. P., & Laudando, A. (2021) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci11040119 · Cited by 79
Engert, M., Evers, J., Hein, A., & Krcmar, H. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10236-3 · Cited by 63
Ecosystem Readiness: Blockchain Adoption is Driven Externally
Lustenberger, M., Malešević, S., & Spychiger, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2021.720454 · Cited by 67
Minkkinen, M., Zimmer, M. P., & Mäntymäki, M. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10269-2 · Cited by 67
Developing a coevolutionary account of innovation ecosystems
Breslin, D., Kask, J., Schlaile, M. P., & Abatecola, G. (2021) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.07.016 · Cited by 70
Vaia, G., Arkhipova, D., & DeLone, W. H. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2022.2078743 · Cited by 83
Vosman, L., Coenen, T. B. J., Volker, L., & Visscher, K. (2023) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2023.2165695 · Cited by 68
Filatotchev, I. V., Lanzolla, G., & Syrigos, E. D. (2023) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063231200819 · Cited by 71
Kanda, W., Klofsten, M., Bieńkowska, D., Audretsch, D. B., & Geissdoerfer, M. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.4229 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A.
- Affiliations
- London Business School (GB)
- Bocconi University (IT)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jacobides, Michael G.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-06-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2255-2276
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2799670133
- Cited by
- 3,724
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 790 · 2025: 565 · 2024: 520 · 2023: 499 · 2022: 483 · 2021: 404 · 2020: 297 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 30
- FWCI
- 358.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- London Business School Research Online (London Business School) (acceptedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- London Business School
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- business ecosystems, ecosystem emergence, modularity, complementarity, inter-organizational coordination, governance forms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review