Cited by 1,282Cultural Differences and ValuesConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

A Cross-National Investigation into the Individual and National Cultural Antecedents of Consumer Innovativeness

Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E.M., ter Hofstede, Frenkel, Wedel, Michel·1999·Journal of Marketing

Abstract

The authors examine antecedents of consumer innovativeness in a cross-national context. They propose a framework that distinguishes individual difference variables and national cultural variables. Two types of individual difference variables are considered: personal values and consumer-context-specific dispositions. The authors develop hypotheses pertaining to the main effects of the variables and their interactions and test them on data collected from 3283 consumers in 11 countries of the European Union. The empirical results are broadly supportive of the hypotheses. The cross-national data used in this study provide a strong test of the generalizability of the findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002224299906300204

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uncertainty Avoidance, among other dimensions, is a strong cultural influence on consumer innovativeness in general.

    “Empirical research in 11 European countries by Steenkamp, ter Hofstede, & Wedel (1999) revealed that Uncertainty Avoidance, among other dimensions, is a strong cultural influence on ''consumer innovativeness'' in general.”

    From Culture and Internet Consumption: Contributions from Cross-Cultural Marketing and Advertising Research (2005) · cites this paper as Steenkamp, ter Hofstede, & Wedel (1999)

  • The catch-up of all high Uncertainty Avoidance cultures to equally high Internet usage rates does not seem to apply to many of them because some other cultural influences on their Internet adoption, including Individualism and other dimensions identified by Hofstede, seem to play important roles.

    “However, this does not seem to apply to many of them because some other cultural influences on their Internet adoption, including Individualism and other dimensions identified by Hofstede (Steenkamp et al., 1999;Yeniyurt & Townsend, 2003), seem to play important roles.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., ter Hofstede, F., & Wedel, M.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Wageningen University and University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Venue
Journal of Marketing
Published
1999-04
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
55-69
ISSN
  • 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-7185
OpenAlex
W2119982576
Cited by
1,282
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 53
FWCI
24.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
consumer innovativeness, individual differences, national culture, personal values, consumer dispositions, cross-national comparison, European consumers, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review