The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance
Open accessAbstract
The assumption that economic actors behave in a boundedly self‐interested manner promises fruitful new insights for strategic management. A growing literature spanning multiple disciplines indicates most actors' selfish utility maximizing behaviors are bounded by norms of fairness. Rather than being purely self‐interested, people behave reciprocally by rewarding others whose actions they deem fair and willingly incurring costs to punish those they deem unfair. Economists show that employers who are perceived as distributionally fair by their employees generate comparatively more value due to the positively reciprocal behavior of those employees. The organizational justice literature distinguishes two additional types of fairness assessed by employees. Drawing from both these bodies of work, we employ stakeholder theory to propose how perceptions of fairness result in reciprocity (1) extending to all stakeholders of the firm and (2) affecting firm performance. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a consequence, theories that include fairness are better equipped to explain behavior in contexts of dispersed control than existing theories of rational behavior (Bosse et al. 2009).”
From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Bosse et al. 2009
In the citing paper
“Instead, based on literature on stakeholder relations (Maignan and Ferrell 2004;Bosse et al. 2009;Choi and Wang 2009;Surroca et al. 2010), we expect their impact to be long-term and indirect.”
From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Bosse et al. 2009
In the citing paper
“Therefore, stakeholders can be expected to optimize self-interest under constraints of fairness (Bosse et al. 2009).”
From Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities (2015) · cites this paper as Bosse et al. 2009
Citations
Cites
Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness
Granovetter, M. (1985) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228311 · Cited by 28,745
Research in Organizational Behavior
Hammer, E. R., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1984) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258300 · Cited by 11,176
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
(1986) · The Antitrust Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0003603x8603100308 · Cited by 10,978
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305279602 · Cited by 10,068
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Critical Issues in Social Justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 · Cited by 6,585
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
WHAT'S IN A NAME? REPUTATION BUILDING AND CORPORATE STRATEGY.
Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. T. (1990) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256324 · Cited by 5,429
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Becker L, 1986, Reciprocity
- Bies RJ, 1986, Justice in the Workplace, 197
- 2007, Patience, fairness and the human condition, Economist, 94
- 10.2307/259074 · DOI
- Leventhal GS, 1980, Justice and Social Interaction, 167
- Rawls J, 1999, Collected Papers: John Rawls, 190
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 558
Dahal, R. K. (2021) · Problems and Perspectives in Management · doi:10.21511/ppm.19(2).2021.11 · Cited by 7
Singh, R. (2021) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-04-2020-0391 · Cited by 7
Stakeholder Value Creation: Legitimating Business Sustainability
Tapaninaho, R., & Kujala, J. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14622-1_31 · Cited by 7
Bressan, A., Alonso, A. D., Vu, O. T. K., & O’Brien, S. (2022) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2022-0148 · Cited by 9
Relevance of CSR for building affective commitment of employees: a multilevel approach
Jha, A. (2022) · Journal of Global Responsibility · doi:10.1108/jgr-04-2022-0036 · Cited by 8
Hedonic and Eudaimonic Job-Related Well-Being: Enjoyment of Job and Fulfillment of Job Purpose
Rothausen, T. J. (2013) · UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota) · Cited by 9
Kasemsap, K. (2016) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9850-5.ch004 · Cited by 7
The Role of Firm Reputation in Corporate Governance Processes
Tomšić, D. (2013) · Cited by 7
Let’s talk about money! Assessing the link between firm performance and voluntary Say-on-Pay votes
Obermann, J. (2019) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-019-00931-8 · Cited by 7
The Concept of Justice in Stakeholder Theory: A Systematic Literature Review
de Melo, V. P., dos Santos, Í. A. T., Jhunior, R. D. O. S., & Uchôa, M. T. (2020) · BASE - Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos · doi:10.4013/base.2020.173.03 · Cited by 7
Teorie ładu korporacyjnego. Władanie i kontrola w złożonym świecie
Adamska, A., Mesjasz, C., & Urbanek, P. (2016) · Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooks · doi:10.18778/8088-341-3 · Cited by 7
Shareholderism: Board Members' Values and the Shareholder-Stakeholder DilemmaPreprint
Adams, R. B., Licht, A. N., & Sagiv, L. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1118664 · Cited by 7
From Instrumental Stakeholder Theory to Stakeholder Capitalism
Laplume, A. O. (2021) · Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.319 · Cited by 7
Shareholderism: Board Members’ Values and the Shareholder-Stakeholder DilemmaPreprint
Adams, R. B., Licht, A. N., & Sagiv, L. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1438396 · Cited by 7
The impact of stakeholder management on restatement disclosure transparency
Hogan, B., & Reid, C. D. (2022) · Review of Accounting and Finance · doi:10.1108/raf-04-2021-0112 · Cited by 6
First things first: Unselfconscious corporate virtuosity and corporate performance
Gould, A. M., Joullié, J., & Gould, K. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3510 · Cited by 7
Wen, T., Wen, L., Zeng, Y., & Zhang, K. (2024) · Tourism Review · doi:10.1108/tr-05-2023-0285 · Cited by 6
The interplay of CSR, stakeholder interest management, capital budgeting, and firm performance
Hunjra, A. I., Arunachalam, M., Verhoeven, P., Colombage, S. R. N., & Bouri, E. I. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100967 · Cited by 6
Peković, S., Wagner, M., & Vogt, S. (2022) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2251 · Cited by 6
He, H., Zhang, Y., & Ding, Y. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14138115 · Cited by 6
Authenticity matters: a nonmarket perspective on the competitive strategy-firm performance nexus
Parnell, J. A. (2024) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2023-1789 · Cited by 6
Abolghasemi, M., Ismail, S. B., Sharif, N. M., Kookhdan, A. R., & Mardani, A. (2018) · Cited by 6
Agency perspective in Islamic political treatises: implications for contemporary management research
Çeyhan, S., & Barca, M. (2021) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-01-2021-0103 · Cited by 6
Nowe wyzwania - strategie : behawioralna i neurostrategia
Polowczyk, J. (2012) · Przegląd Organizacji · doi:10.33141/po.2012.12.02 · Cited by 6
Bridging the transactional and relational view on management-stakeholder cooperation
Vos, J. F. J., & Achterkamp, M. C. (2015) · International journal of organizational analysis · doi:10.1108/ijoa-07-2013-0692 · Cited by 6
Interorganizational Strategizing
de Gooyert, V., Rouwette, E. A. J. A., & van Kranenburg, H. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108347921.007 · Cited by 6
Beliefs and Accountability in an Islamic BankPreprint
Alaudin, A., Shantapriyan, P. T., & Adler, R. W. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2275426 · Cited by 6
Measuring Value Creation and Appropriation in Firms: Application of the VCA ModelPreprint
García‐Castro, R., Balasubramanian, N., & Lieberman, M. B. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2381822 · Cited by 6
Eib, C., & Soenen, G. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119168058.ch15 · Cited by 7
Corporate governance, information asymmetry and firm performance: evidence from Thailand
Silpachai, K., Siengthai, S., & Levermore, R. (2024) · Cogent Economics & Finance · doi:10.1080/23322039.2024.2379583 · Cited by 12
Jeong, H., Kaul, A., & Luo, J. (2025) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3691 · Cited by 5
How Did It Come to Be? Circular Economy as Collective Stakeholder Action
Albareda, L., & Kimpimäki, J. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-31937-2_2 · Cited by 5
Size matters: The market–non-market strategy nexus and firm performance in South Africa
Parnell, J. A., Troilo, M., & Dobbelstein, T. (2024) · South African Journal of Business Management · doi:10.4102/sajbm.v55i1.4273 · Cited by 5
Cumming, D. J., Lu, F., Xu, L., & Yu, C.-F. J. (2025) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102736 · Cited by 5
Business Model for Scaling Social Impact towards Sustainability by Social Entrepreneurs
François, K. K., & Goi, H. C. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151814027 · Cited by 5
Rethinking the ontology of the shareholder model of the corporation
KAKABADSE, N. K., Kakabadse, A., Kouzmin, A., & Pesqueux, Y. (2013) · Society and Business Review · doi:10.1108/17465681311297711 · Cited by 5
Murphy, G., & Tocher, N. M. (2011) · New England journal of entrepreneurship · doi:10.1108/neje-14-01-2011-b002 · Cited by 5
Stakeholder Value Creation: Legitimating Business Sustainability
Tapaninaho, R., & Kujala, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_31-1 · Cited by 5
Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments
Paraskevas, J., Eckerd, S., & Grimm, C. M. (2021) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12273 · Cited by 5
La medición del desempeño social empresarial a través de las redes sociales
Sesma, J., Husted, B. W., & Banks, J. (2014) · Contaduría y Administración · doi:10.1016/s0186-1042(14)71257-4 · Cited by 5
Communicating with stakeholders when bad news is uncertain
Baker, S., & Hernandez, M. (2017) · International Journal of Public Leadership · doi:10.1108/ijpl-11-2016-0051 · Cited by 7
Customer Satisfaction in Nepalese Cellular Networks
Dahal, R. K. (2019) · Tribhuvan University Journal · doi:10.3126/tuj.v33i2.33607 · Cited by 5
An Evaluation of Corporate Governance Disclosure in Ghanaian and Nigerian Banks
Isukul, A., & Chizea John, J. (2017) · International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development · doi:10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.31.2003 · Cited by 5
Fairness and Organizational Performance: Insights for Supply Chain ManagementPreprint
Yeoman, R., & Santos, M. M. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2893103 · Cited by 5
Sustainability and Implicit Contracts
Misani, N. (2020) · Business & society 360 · doi:10.1108/s2514-175920200000004005 · Cited by 4
A Cognitive Analytics Management Framework (CAM-Part 1)
Osman, I. H., & Anouze, A. L. (2015) · Advances in logistics, operations, and management science book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4474-8.ch001 · Cited by 4
Tourism ecosystem management: The role of trust and procedural justice
Jäckli, U., & Meier, C. (2024) · Tourism and Hospitality Research · doi:10.1177/14673584241229644 · Cited by 8
Turner, K. D., & Lee, J. (2024) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/srj-08-2023-0476 · Cited by 4
The Past and Future of Stakeholder Theory: Introducing the TOPPER Framework
Boeken, J., van den Berg, B., & van Steen, T. (2024) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1007524 · Cited by 4
How to make strategic conversations more AGIL
Duhamel, F. B., & Niess, A. (2024) · Journal of strategy and management · doi:10.1108/jsma-03-2024-0055 · Cited by 4
Shareholder Wealth Maximization and Social Welfare
Jones, T. M., & Felps, W. (2013) · Cited by 4
A Cognitive Analytics Management Framework (CAM-Part 1)
Osman, I. H., & Anouze, A. L. (2017) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1837-2.ch010 · Cited by 4
Scandinavian Cooperative Advantage
Strand, R. G. (2013) · Palgrave Macmillan eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137378491.0011 · Cited by 4
Motives for (non) practicing demotion
Verheyen, T., & Guerry, M. (2018) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-01-2017-0024 · Cited by 4
Does corporate ownership matter for innovation?
Lee, S. (2021) · Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy · doi:10.1080/13547860.2021.1884174 · Cited by 4
The mission statement in Catholic higher education organizations and identity challenges
Serra, F. A. R., Mazieri, M. R., Scafuto, I. C., Cruz, J. A. W., & Pinoti, F. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/ijem-09-2021-0367 · Cited by 5
Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., & Palmié, M. (2022) · Issues in business ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72204-3_36 · Cited by 4
Self-citationQuintelier, K. J. P., & Vock, M. (2022) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2022.12.010 · Cited by 7
Janney, J. J., & Chaudhuri, M. (2023) · Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.12594 · Cited by 4
Le, T. T., Battisti, E., & Lan, T. (2024) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2024.04.002 · Cited by 4
Panigrahi, S., Zainuddin, Y., & Azizan, N. A. (2015) · UMP Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Pahang) · Cited by 4
Stakeholder Action: Predictors of Punitive and Prosocial Stakeholder Behaviours
Hayibor, S. (2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s2514-175920170000011 · Cited by 4
Pragmatism and pluralism: A moral foundation for stakeholder theory in the 21st century
Godfrey, P. C., & Lewis, B. W. (2018) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 4
Addressing Wicked Problems Using New Business Models
Henriques, I. (2018) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
Keep the Conversation Going: Theory and Method in Strategic Management
Hoskisson, R. E., & Harrison, J. S. (2021) · Strategic Management · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190090883.003.0002 · Cited by 4
Self-citationStakeholders or Shareholders? Board members’ personal values and corporate identity
Barbero, E. R., & Marchiano, M. (2016) · Review of Business Management · doi:10.7819/rbgn.v18i61.3020 · Cited by 4
Eskerod, P. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316662243.017 · Cited by 4
Alinhamento da materialidade à distribuição de valor aos stakeholders e sua relação com o desempenho
Barbosa, R. D. A. (2019) · doi:10.11606/t.12.2019.tde-28052019-155821 · Cited by 4
Social Systems as Moral Agents: A Systems Approach to Moral Agency in Business
de Pedro, J. M. L. (2024) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-024-05677-0 · Cited by 3
11. To minimize or mobilize? The trade-offs associated with the crisis communication process
Pfarrer, M. D., Bundy, J. N., Muller, A. R., & Wheeler, A. R. (2020) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110554236-011 · Cited by 3
Lazzarini, S. G., Boehe, D. M., Pongeluppe, L., & Cook, M. L. (2025) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2025.3 · Cited by 3
Vlachos, P. A., Theotokis, A., & Panagopoulos, N. G. (2010) · Industrial Marketing Management · Cited by 3
La gouvernance d’entreprise au Canada : un domaine en transition
Latrous, I., Morency, M.-A., Ouedraogo, S., & Simard, J. (2017) · Revue Organisations & territoires · doi:10.1522/revueot.v26i1-2.196 · Cited by 3
Torres, A. I. Z., & Zamora, M. R. O. (2021) · Ensayos Revista de Economía · doi:10.29105/ensayos40.2-4 · Cited by 3
Kujala, J., Heikkinen, A., Jokinen, A., & Tapaninaho, R. (2022) · South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases · doi:10.1177/22779779221079484 · Cited by 3
Employee treatment and Securities Exchange Commission investigations
Brodmann, J., & Unsal, O. (2023) · Managerial Finance · doi:10.1108/mf-09-2022-0419 · Cited by 3
The Influence of Organizational Justice on Firm Performance: A Stakeholder Management Perspective
Gomes, V. P. D. M., Boaventura, J. M. G., & Branco, M. C. (2023) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80455-964-220231009 · Cited by 3
Mayr, S., Duller, C., & Baschinger, M. (2023) · European Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10657-023-09771-y · Cited by 3
The impact of nonmarket strategies in the CEE region: Evidence from Romanian and Polish firms
Parnell, J. A., Vaduva, S. A., & Fotea, S. L. (2025) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.70001 · Cited by 3
He, J., Liu, J., Li, T., & Song, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991899 · Cited by 3
James, H. S. (2021) · Review of Social Economy · doi:10.1080/00346764.2021.1914342 · Cited by 3
A Good Story but not the Whole Story: Stakeholder Theory as an Ethics of Capitalism
Hargrave, T. J., & Smith, J. (2025) · Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.12774 · Cited by 2
Beyond Profit: The Role of Benevolent Business Processes in Building Long-Term Firm Success
Chandrasiri, T., Croes, N., Bandara, W., Türetken, O., Ostern, N., Rosemann, M., & Voß, M. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02867-9_29 · Cited by 2
The effect of operational activity volatility on earnings quality: A textual analysis
Liu, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, M., & Zhang, M. (2025) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2025.104734 · Cited by 4
Neumann, K., Bettinazzi, E. L. M., Mahoney, J. T., Snoeren, P., & Zollo, M. (2025) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102592 · Cited by 2
Marginalized Stakeholder Theory: A Normative Foundation for Decolonization
Chowdhury, R. R. (2026) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-026-06269-w · Cited by 2
CSR: What Does Board Diversity Bring to the Table?
Yousfi, O., & Béji, R. (2020) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.94342 · Cited by 2
Kaur, P., & Carreras, A. L. (2021) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-021-09732-3 · Cited by 2
Stakeholder management: evidence on the performance of publicly traded companies
Cintra, R. F., Ribeiro, I., Fava, H. D. L., & Costa, B. K. (2023) · Revista de Administração da UFSM · doi:10.5902/1983465971638 · Cited by 2
Proxy favors: Confidential proxy voting with institutional dual holders
Becker, W. J., Mansi, S., Nazari, M., & Wald, J. (2023) · Corporate governance: An International Review · doi:10.1111/corg.12557 · Cited by 2
Chen, J. C., & Roberts, R. W. (2023) · Financial Accountability and Management · doi:10.1111/faam.12380 · Cited by 5
Watkins, D. V., & Denney, V. (2023) · Journal of Leadership Accountability and Ethics · doi:10.33423/jlae.v20i5.6602 · Cited by 2
Durán, P., Jeldes-Delgado, F., Ciravegna, L., & Harrison, J. S. (2025) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2025.01.008 · Cited by 2
Self-citationDimensión comunicativa del buen gobierno empresarial
Gutiérrez‐García, E. (2010) · Deposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra) · Cited by 2
Autorité de gestion et avaries communes : pour un complément du droit de l'entreprise ?
Segrestin, B., & Hatchuel, A. (2011) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2
Theuvsen, L. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-06177-7_14 · Cited by 2
Perception, reflection and communication: an empirical case study within the pharmaceutical industry
Ulrich, G., Sachs, S. R., & Millett, B. (2010) · Corporate Governance · doi:10.1108/14720701011069669 · Cited by 2
de Gooyert, V. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25405-6_12 · Cited by 2
How Does Reciprocity Affect Undergraduate Student Orientation towards Stakeholders?
Godos‐Díez, J., Gago, R. F., & García, L. C. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11215987 · Cited by 2
ARE BOARDS ON BOARD? A MODEL OF CORPORATE BOARD INFLUENCE ON SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE
Galbreath, J. (2012) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.5172/jmo.2012.2053 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Richmond (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bosse, Douglas A.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11-24
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 447-456
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2146209612
- Cited by
- 558
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 31.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- autopapers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- reciprocity, fairness, stakeholder theory, firm performance, organizational justice, distributive fairness, procedural justice, perceived fairness, employee behavior, stakeholder perspectives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review