The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multicenter screening for pre‐eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks' gestation: comparison with NICE guidelines and ACOG recommendations
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To compare the performance of screening for pre‐eclampsia (PE) based on risk factors from medical history, as recommended by NICE and ACOG, with the method proposed by The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), which uses Bayes' theorem to combine the a‐priori risk from maternal factors, derived by a multivariable logistic model, with the results of various combinations of biophysical and biochemical measurements. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study of screening for PE in 8775 singleton pregnancies at 11–13 weeks' gestation. A previously published FMF algorithm was used for the calculation of patient‐specific risk of PE in each individual. The detection rates (DRs) and false‐positive rates (FPRs) for delivery with PE < 32, < 37 and ≥ 37 weeks were estimated and compared with those derived from application of NICE guidelines and ACOG recommendations. According to NICE, all high‐risk pregnancies should be offered low‐dose aspirin. According to ACOG, use of aspirin should be reserved for women with a history of PE in at least two previous pregnancies or PE requiring delivery < 34 weeks' gestation. Results: In the study population, 239 (2.7%) cases developed PE, of which 17 (0.2%), 59 (0.7%) and 180 (2.1%) developed PE < 32, < 37 and ≥ 37 weeks, respectively. Screening with use of the FMF algorithm based on a combination of maternal factors, mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA‐PI) and serum placental growth factor (PlGF) detected 100% (95% CI, 80–100%) of PE < 32 weeks, 75% (95% CI, 62–85%) of PE < 37 weeks and 43% (95% CI, 35–50%) of PE ≥ 37 weeks, at a 10.0% FPR. Screening with use of NICE guidelines detected 41% (95% CI, 18–67%) of PE < 32 weeks, 39% (95% CI, 27–53%) of PE < 37 weeks and 34% (95% CI, 27–41%) of PE ≥ 37 weeks, at 10.2% FPR. Screening with use of ACOG recommendations detected 94% (95% CI, 71–100%) of PE < 32 weeks, 90% (95% CI, 79–96%) of PE < 37 weeks and 89% (95% CI, 84–94%) of PE ≥ 37 weeks, at 64.2% FPR. Screening based on the ACOG recommendations for use of aspirin detected 6% (95% CI, 1–27%) of PE < 32 weeks, 5% (95% CI, 2–14%) of PE < 37 weeks and 2% (95% CI, 0.3–5%) of PE ≥ 37 weeks, at 0.2% FPR. Conclusion: Performance of screening for PE at 11–13 weeks' gestation by the FMF algorithm using a combination of maternal factors, MAP, UtA‐PI and PlGF, is by far superior to the methods recommended by NICE and ACOG. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
(2013) · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000437382.03963.88 · Cited by 3,961
Brown, M. A., Lindheimer, M. D., Swiet, M. D., Assche, A. V., & Moutquin, J.-M. (2001) · Hypertension in Pregnancy · doi:10.1081/prg-100104165 · Cited by 1,894
Bujold, E., Roberge, S., Lacasse, Y., Bureau, M., Audibert, F., Marcoux, S., Forest, J.-C., & Giguère, Y. (2010) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181e9322a · Cited by 1,092
O’Gorman, N., Wright, D., Syngelaki, A., Akolekar, R., Wright, A., Poon, L. C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2016) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.034 · Cited by 629
Self-citationUterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia
Plasencia, W., Maiz, N., Bonino, S., Kaihura, C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2007) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5157 · Cited by 425
Self-citationCompeting risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal characteristics and medical history
Wright, D., Syngelaki, A., Akolekar, R., Poon, L. C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2015) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.018 · Cited by 417
Self-citationPrevention of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcome using low‐dose aspirin: a meta‐analysis
Roberge, S., Nicolaides, K. H., Demers, S., Villa, P., & Bujold, E. (2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.12421 · Cited by 391
Self-citationRoberge, S., Villa, P., Nicolaides, K., Giguère, Y., Vainio, M., Bakthi, A., Ebrashy, A., & Bujold, E. (2012) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000336662 · Cited by 381
Self-citationTurning the Pyramid of Prenatal Care
Nicolaides, K. H. (2011) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000324320 · Cited by 357
Self-citation
Cited by
Mancia, G., Kreutz, R., Brunström, M., Burnier, M., Grassi, G., Januszewicz, A., Muiesan, M. L., Tsioufis, K., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Algharably, E. A. E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000003480 · Cited by 3,473
Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia
Rolnik, D. L., Wright, D., Poon, L. C., O’Gorman, N., Syngelaki, A., de Paco Matallana, C., Akolekar, R., Cicero, S., Janga, D., Singh, M., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1704559 · Cited by 2,287
Self-citationRana (2019) · doi:10.1161/circresaha.118.313276 · Cited by 2,095
Brown, M. A., Magee, L. A., Kenny, L. C., Karumanchi, S. A., McCarthy, F. P., Saito, S., Hall, D. R., Warren, C. E., Adoyi, G., & Ishaku, S. (2018) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.117.10803 · Cited by 2,089
Magee, L. A., Brown, M. A., Hall, D. R., Gupte, S., Hennessy, A., Karumanchi, S. A., Kenny, L. C., McCarthy, F., Myers, J., Poon, L. C., et al. (2022) · Pregnancy Hypertension · doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2021.09.008 · Cited by 1,134
Self-citationDevelopment of the human placenta
Turco, M. Y., & Moffett, A. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.163428 · Cited by 698
Aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: systematic review and metaanalysis
Roberge, S., Bujold, E., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.561 · Cited by 628
Self-citationFirst trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction
Chaemsaithong, P., Sahota, D. S., & Poon, L. C. (2022) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.020 · Cited by 363
Self-citationMalone, S. L., Haj Yahya, R., & Kane, S. C. (2022) · International Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s283239 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Gorman, N., Wright, D., Poon, L. C., Rolnik, D. L., Syngelaki, A., de Alvarado, M., Carbone, I. F., Dutemeyer, V., Fiolna, M., Frick, A., Karagiotis, N., Mastrodima, S., de Paco Matallana, C., Papaioannou, G., Pazos, A., Plasencia, W., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 756-760
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2592251773
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 37.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.