Cited by 59Embodied and Extended CognitionVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAction Observation and Synchronization

What is peripersonal space? An examination of unresolved empirical issues and emerging findings

Hunley, Samuel B., Lourenco, Stella F.·2018·WIREs Cognitive Science

Abstract

Findings from diverse fields of study, including neuroscience, psychology, zoology, and sociology, demonstrate that human and non-human primates maintain a representation of the space immediately surrounding the body, known as peripersonal space (PPS). However, progress in this field has been hampered by the lack of an agreed upon definition of PPS. Since the beginning of its formal study, scientists have argued that PPS plays a crucial role in both defensive and non-defensive actions. Yet consensus is lacking about the cognitive and neural instantiation of these functions. In particular, researchers have begun to ask whether a single, unified system of spatial-attentional resources supports both the defensive and non-defensive functions of PPS or, rather, whether there are multiple, independent systems. Moreover, there are open questions about the specificity of PPS. For example: Does PPS dissociate from other well-known phenomena such as personal space and the body schema? Finally, emerging research has brought attention to important questions about individual differences in the flexibility of PPS and the distribution of PPS in front compared to behind the body. In this advanced review, we shed light on questions about the nature of PPS, offering answers when the research permits or providing recommendations for achieving answers in future research. In so doing, we lay the groundwork for a comprehensive definition of PPS. This article is categorized under: Cognitive Biology…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wcs.1472

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since the discovery of PPS, its definition and functional roles have been continuously expanding and re-conceptualizing.

    “Since the discovery of the PPS, its definition and functional roles have been continuously expanding (Bufacchi & Iannetti, 2018;Hunley & Lourenco, 2018) and re-conceptualizing (Serino, 2019).”

    From The Peripersonal Space in a social world (2021) · cites this paper as Hunley & Lourenco, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunley, S. B., & Lourenco, S. F.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Lourenco, Stella F.
Venue
WIREs Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-09
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
e1472-e1472
ISSN
  • 1939-5078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5086
OpenAlex
W2834035559
Cited by
59
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Emory University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
peripersonal space, personal space, body schema, spatial attention, defensive behavior, individual differences, front-back asymmetry, non-human primates, cognitive flexibility
MeSH terms
Body Image, Personal Space, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review