Cited by 135Youth Substance Use and School AttendancePsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsYouth Education and Societal Dynamics

Hikikomori: experience in Japan and international relevance

Open access
Kato, Takahiro A., Kanba, Shigenobu, Teo, Alan R.·2018·World Psychiatry

Abstract

The appearance of people in Japan, especially young men, who stopped going to school or the workplace and spent most of the time withdrawn into their homes for months or years, came to be seen as an increasing social phenomenon called Shakaiteki hikikomori (social withdrawal) by the late 1990s1. A community-based survey published in 2010 reported that the prevalence of hikikomori was approximately 1.2% of the Japanese population2, and in 2016 a Japanese cabinet report estimated people with hikikomori to be about 541,000 within the age range of 15-39 years. Early epidemiological studies were limited by not being based on strict diagnostic standards. In 2010, Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare announced a guideline for hikikomori which included a definition ("a situation where a person without psychosis is withdrawn into his/her home for more than six months and does not participate in society such as attending school and/or work")3. More recently, in order not only to diagnose but also to assess the severity of the condition, we proposed even more precise diagnostic criteria based on the levels of physical isolation at home, avoidance of social interactions, and functional impairment or distress, as well as a sustained duration of six months or more4. The Japanese sociocultural background has been traditionally permeated by "amae" (accepting overdependent behaviors) and shame, which may underlie the culture-bound syndrome called Taijin Kyofusho (a severe form of so…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20497

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kato, T. A., Kanba, S., & Teo, A. R.
Affiliations
Kyushu University (JP)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-19
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
105-106
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W2789384876
Cited by
135
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6
FWCI
42.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K15431, 26713039)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Keywords
hikikomori, social withdrawal, social isolation, diagnostic criteria, culture-bound syndromes, amae, shame, taijin kyofusho, social anxiety disorder, parent-child relationship, social skills, functional disability, Japan, young adults, mental health services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review