Cited by 229Youth Substance Use and School AttendancePsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Identification of the hikikomori syndrome of social withdrawal: Psychosocial features and treatment preferences in four countries

Open access
Teo, Alan R, Fetters, Michael D, Stufflebam, Kyle, Tateno, Masaru, Balhara, Yatan, Choi, Tae Young, Kanba, Shigenobu, Mathews, Carol A +1 more·2015·International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Hikikomori, a form of social withdrawal first reported in Japan, may exist globally but cross-national studies of cases of hikikomori are lacking. Aims: To identify individuals with hikikomori in multiple countries and describe features of the condition. Method: Participants were recruited from sites in India, Japan, Korea and the United States. Hikikomori was defined as a 6-month or longer period of spending almost all time at home and avoiding social situations and social relationships, associated with significant distress/impairment. Additional measures included the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale, Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and modified Cornell Treatment Preferences Index. Results: A total of 36 participants with hikikomori were identified, with cases detected in all four countries. These individuals had high levels of loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale M = 55.4, SD = 10.5), limited social networks (LSNS-6 M = 9.7, SD = 5.5) and moderate functional impairment (SDS M = 16.5, SD = 7.9). Of them 28 (78%) desired treatment for their social withdrawal, with a significantly higher preference for psychotherapy over pharmacotherapy, in-person over telepsychiatry treatment and mental health specialists over primary care providers. Across countries, participants with hikikomori had similar generally treatment preferences and psychosocial features. Conclusion: Hikikomori exists cross-nationally and can be assessed with a standardized assessment tool. Individuals with hikikomori have substantial psychosocial impairment and disability, and some may desire treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020764014535758

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Furuhashi T, Suzuki K, Teruyama J, Sedooka A, Tsuda H, Shimizu M, Castel PH. Commonalities and differences in hikikomori youths in Japan and France. Nagoya Journal of Health, Physical Fitness & Sports. 2011;34(1):29–33. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jayashankar Study on personality and loneliness among the students of IIT Hyderabad. IDP Poster Presentation. Lecture conducted from Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, India 2013 [Google Scholar]
  3. Kudou R, Nishikawa M. Kaiteiban UCLA kodokukun shakudo [The study for loneliness: Assessment of reliability and validity of the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale] Experimental Social Psychological Research. 1983;22:99–108. [Google Scholar]
  4. Saito K. Hikikomori no hyouka shien ni kansuru gaidorain [Guideline on evaluation and support of hikikomori] Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sheehan DV. Sheehan disability scale. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1983. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yoshida T, Otsubo T, Tsuchida H, Wada Y, Kamijima K. Reliability and validity of the Sheehan Disability Scale-Japanese Version. Rinsyoseishinyakuri. 2004;7:1645–1653. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teo, A. R., Fetters, M. D., Stufflebam, K., Tateno, M., Balhara, Y., Choi, T. Y., Kanba, S., Mathews, C. A., & Kato, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Portland VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Sapporo Medical University (JP)
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Daegu Catholic University (KR)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
64-72
ISSN
  • 0020-7640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2854
OpenAlex
W2118458816
Cited by
229
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
49.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK2 HX001789)
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Pfizer Health Research Foundation
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26713039, 24650227, 24591724)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
hikikomori, social withdrawal, loneliness, functional disability, treatment preferences, psychotherapy versus pharmacotherapy, telepsychiatry, cross-national comparison, psychosocial impairment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Demography, Drug Therapy, Female, Humans, India, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Social Isolation, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Republic of Korea, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review