Cited by 37Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Comparison of two introduction methods for African elephants (Loxodonta africana)

Open access
Burks, Kyle D., Mellen, Jill D., Miller, Gary W., Lehnhardt, John, Weiss, Alexander, Figueredo, Aurelio J., Maple, Terry L.·2004·Zoo Biology

Abstract

Abstract Managers must consider an animal's potential for aggression when they decide to change or form a captive social group formation. In this study we compared two introduction methods (termed “sequential” and “nonsequential” introductions) in African elephants to assess their effectiveness in managing aggression and minimizing stress. Both introduction methods included four phases: baseline, visual contact, limited tactile contact, and physical introduction. In the sequential introduction, these steps were followed sequentially, and empirical data were considered during decision‐making. In the nonsequential introduction, these steps were not followed sequentially, and decision‐making was based primarily on intuitive assessments by animal managers. Behavioral data and fecal corticoid concentrations were measured throughout both types of introduction. The behavior categories measured included active aggression, passive aggression, submissive behavior, undesirable/stress‐related behavior, and affiliative behavior. While the role of affiliative behavior was surprising, general behavior patterns were characterized by increases in behavior as animals progressed to the next phase of introduction regardless of introduction type. These increases then attenuated over time during each phase. Overall, less behavior was observed during the sequential introduction, as predicted. The data suggest that the sequential introduction managed aggression more effectively. Similar patterns were predicted for undesirable/stress‐related behavior and fecal corticoid concentration. Undesirable/stress‐related behavior was a poor predictor of observed behavior patterns. Although the patterns differed from those predicted, higher concentrations of fecal corticoids were measured during the nonsequential introduction and correlated significantly only with submissive behavior. While more investigation is warranted, the data indicate that the nonsequential introduction brought about an increased physiological response. Overall, the sequential introduction method appeared to manage aggression and stress better than the nonsequential technique. Every introduction is subject to factors that can influence success, such as staff experience, the design of the facility, and the animals' social histories. It is hoped that the rigorous sequential protocol will be a useful tool in the animal manager's “toolbox” for planning and implementing introductions. Applications of this introduction method are also discussed. Zoo Biol 23:109–126, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.10132

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burks, K. D., Mellen, J. D., Miller, G. W., Lehnhardt, J., Weiss, A., Figueredo, A. J., & Maple, T. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Walt Disney (United States) (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Burks, Kyle D.
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
109-126
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W2135743800
Cited by
37
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
Loxodonta africana, aggression management, stress, affiliative behavior, submissiveness, inappropriate behavior, zoo animal management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review