Cited by 32Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Social Life of Captive Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus) in Southern India: Implications for Elephant Welfare

Vanitha, Varadharajan, Thiyagesan, Krishnamoorthy, Baskaran, Nagarajan·2011·Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science

Abstract

Asian elephants in the wild live in complex social societies; in captivity, however, management often occurs in solitary conditions, especially at the temples and private places of India. To investigate the effect of social isolation, this study assessed the social group sizes and the presence of stereotypies among 140 captive Asian elephants managed in 3 captive systems (private, temple, and forest department) in Tamil Nadu, India, between 2003 and 2005. The majority of the facilities in the private (82%) and temple (95%) systems held a single elephant without opportunity for social interaction. The forest department managed the elephants in significantly larger groups than the private and temple systems. Among the 3 systems, the proportion of elephants with stereotypies was the highest in temple (49%) followed by private system (26%) and the forest department facility (6%); this correlates with the social isolation trend observed in the 3 systems and suggests a possible link between social isolation and abnormal elephant behavior separate from other environmental factors. The results of this study indicate it would be of greater benefit to elephant well being to keep the patchily distributed solitary temple and private elephants who are socially compatible and free from contagious diseases in small social groups at "common elephant houses" for socialization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10888705.2011.527603

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vanitha, V., Thiyagesan, K., & Baskaran, N.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Venue
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
Published
2011-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
42-58
ISSN
  • 1088-8705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7604
OpenAlex
W2086592562
Cited by
32
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Indian Institute of Science
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
Asian elephant, captive elephants, social isolation, stereotypy, abnormal behavior, social group size, elephant welfare, socialization, Tamil Nadu
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animal Welfare, Behavior, Animal, Elephants, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Social Isolation, Stereotyped Behavior, Trees, Private Sector, Observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review