Cited by 99Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorDietary Effects on Health

Greater Appetite Control Associated with an Increased Frequency of Eating in Lean Males

SPEECHLY, D.P., BUFFENSTEIN, R.·1999·Appetite

Abstract

Eight healthy males of age 22.9+/-4.2 years (mean+/-SD) and body weight 73.26+/-11.50 kg, with BMI of 23.11+/-2.84 kg/m(2)underwent two different eating meal frequency patterns on 2 separate days. On both days they were fed approximately 33.3% of their average daily energy requirements as a breakfast pre-load meal: served either as a single meal (SINGLE) or divided into five equal portions (served hourly) (MULTI). Five and a half hours after the initial meal, an ad libitum meal was served. Venous blood was tested to determine plasma glucose and serum insulin concentrations every hour until the ad libitum lunch, and at 15-, 45- and 75-min after lunch. Visual analogue scales (VAS) were completed every hour until the ad libitum lunch, and at 15-, 45- and 75-min after lunch as a measure to determine hunger, appetite and satiety indices. Although both groups were fed isocaloric and identical macronutrient "breakfast pre-loads" (3450+/-466 kJ), the SINGLE group consumed 26.6% more (p<0.02) energy in the ad libitum lunch (5111+/-1502 kJ vs. 3752+/-893 kJ) than the MULTI group did. The pre-load feeding pattern had no effect on blood glucose responses throughout the trial. Following the larger SINGLE pre-load, serum insulin concentration rose to a higher (p<0.01) level compared to the first of the MULTI pre-load meals (123.04+/-61.51 microIU/ml vs. 37. 30+/-26.65 microIU/ml SINGLE vs. MULTI, respectively). Serum insulin rose to a higher (p<0.01) level following the fifth and final of the MULTI pre-load meals compared to the serum insulin levels in the SINGLE group at the same time into the trial (74. 21+/-51.64 microIU/ml vs. 24.98+/-13.46 microIU/ml MULTI vs. SINGLE, respectively). Despite consuming more energy in the ad libitum lunch, the SINGLE group showed no difference in serum insulin concentration following the ad libitum lunch compared to the insulin response of the MULTI group. These data suggest that when the nutrient load was spread into equal amounts and consumed evenly through the day in lean healthy males, there was an enhanced control of appetite. This greater control of satiety when consuming smaller multiple meals may possibly be linked to an attenuation in insulin response although clearly both other physical (gastric stretch) and physiological (release of gastric hormones) factors may also be affected by the periodicity of eating.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/appe.1999.0265

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SPEECHLY, D. P., & BUFFENSTEIN, R.
Affiliations
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-12
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
285-297
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015301033
Cited by
99
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
meal frequency, appetite regulation, satiety, hunger, insulin response, blood glucose, energy intake, ad libitum meal, isocaloric feeding, dietary habits, postprandial insulin secretion, postprandial blood glucose, satiety hormones, leptin, ghrelin, cholecystokinin, glucagon-like peptide-1
MeSH terms
Adult, Appetite Regulation, Blood Glucose, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Hunger, Insulin, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Satiety Response, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review