Cited by 279Dietary Effects on HealthRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Meal frequency and energy balance

Open access
Bellisle, France, McDevitt, Regina, Prentice, Andrew M.·1997·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Several epidemiological studies have observed an inverse relationship between people's habitual frequency of eating and body weight, leading to the suggestion that a ‘nibbling’ meal pattern may help in the avoidance of obesity. A review of all pertinent studies shows that, although many fail to find any significant relationship, the relationship is consistently inverse in those that do observe a relationship. However, this finding is highly vulnerable to the probable confounding effects of post hoc changes in dietary patterns as a consequence of weight gain and to dietary under-reporting which undoubtedly invalidates some of the studies. We conclude that the epidemiological evidence is at best very weak, and almost certainly represents an artefact. A detailed review of the possible mechanistic explanations for a metabolic advantage of nibbling meal patterns failed to reveal significant benefits in respect of energy expenditure. Although some short-term studies suggest that the thermic effect of feeding is higher when an isoenergetic test load is divided into multiple small meals, other studies refute this, and most are neutral. More importantly, studies using whole-body calorimetry and doubly-labelled water to assess total 24h energy expenditure find no difference between nibbling and gorging. Finally, with the exception of a single study, there is no evidence that weight loss on hypoenergetic regimens is altered by meal frequency. We conclude that any effects of meal pattern on the regulation of body weight are likely to be mediated through effects on the food intake side of the energy balance equation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn19970104

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Cohn, C. & Allweiss, M. D. (1963). Fats, rats, chickens, and men -results of feeding frequency. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 12, 255-265.
  2. Debry, G., Azouaou, R., Vassilitch, I. & Mottaz, G. (1973). Ponderal losses in obese subjects submitted to restricted diets differing by nibbling and by lipid and carbohydrate. In Energy Balance in Man, pp. 305-310 [
  3. Flatt, J.-P. (1985). Energetics of intermediary metabolism. Substrate and Energy Metabolism, pp. 58-69 [
  4. J. S . Garrow and D. Halliday, editors]. London: John Libbey, Suppl. 1, s39-s55. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19970104 Published online by Cambridge University Press ,569
  5. King, S. M. & Gibney, M. J. (1997). The effect of dietetic advice on incorporating altered meal frequency for hyperlipidaemic patients on low-fat diets. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 56, 131A.
  6. Nunes, W. T. & Canham, J. E. (1963). The effect of varied periodicity of eating on serum lipids and carbohydrate tolerance in man. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 12, 334-339.
  7. Poppitt, S. D., Swann, D., Black, A. E. & Prentice, A. M. (1995). Is under-reporting of energy intake in obese women macronutrient specific? Covert measurements in a metabolic facility. International Journal of Obesity 19, Suppl. 2, 29.
  8. Wolfram, G., Kirchbegner, M., Miiller, H. L. & Hollomey, S. (1987). Thermogenese des Menschen bei unterschiedlicher Malzeitenhaufigkeit (Thermogenesis in human subjects with differing meal frequencies). Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 31, 88-97.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bellisle, F., McDevitt, R., & Prentice, A. M.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
1997-04
Volume
77
Issue
S1
Pages
S57-S70
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2017993004
Cited by
279
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
meal frequency, energy balance, obesity prevention, body weight regulation, energy expenditure, thermic effect of feeding, hypocaloric diet, dietary intake
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Body Weight, Child, Diet, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review