Cited by 94Memory Processes and InfluencesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Post-event spontaneous intrusive recollections and strength of memory for emotional events in men and women

Open access
Ferree, Nikole K., Cahill, Larry·2009·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

Spontaneous intrusive recollections (SIRs) follow traumatic events in clinical and non-clinical populations. To determine whether any relationship exists between SIRs and enhanced memory for emotional events, participants viewed emotional or neutral films, had their memory for the films tested two days later, and estimated the number of SIRs they experienced for each film. SIR frequency related positively to memory strength, an effect more pronounced in the emotional condition. These findings represent the first demonstration of a relationship between SIRs occurring after an emotional experience and subsequent memory strength for that experience. The results are consistent with the possibility that emotional arousal leads both to elevated SIR frequency and better memory, and that the covert rehearsal associated with SIRs enhances memory for emotional relative to neutral stimuli. Additional evidence of menstrual cycle influences on SIR incidence in female participants appears to merit consideration in future work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2008.11.008

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferree, N. K., & Cahill, L.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Ferree, Nikole K.
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
126-134
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078229282
Cited by
94
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH057508, R01 MH57808)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
emotional memory, memory strength, emotional arousal, covert rehearsal, sex differences, menstrual cycle, traumatic events, film viewing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Memory, Menstrual Cycle, Mental Recall, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review