Cited by 622Sport Psychology and PerformanceMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Templates in chess memory: a mechanism for recalling several boards

Open access
Gobet, Fernand, Simon, Herbert A.·1996·Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

This paper addresses empirically and theoretically a question derived from the chunking theory of memory (Chase & Simon, 1973a, 1973b): To what extent is skilled chess memory limited by the size of short-term memory (about seven chunks)? This question is addressed first with an experiment where subjects, ranking from class A players to grandmasters, are asked to recall up to five positions presented during 5 s each. Results show a decline of percentage of recall with additional boards, but also show that expert players recall more pieces than is predicted by the chunking theory in its original form. A second experiment shows that longer latencies between the presentation of boards facilitate recall. In a third experiment, a Chessmaster gradually increases the number of boards he can reproduce with higher than 70% average accuracy to nine, replacing as many as 160 pieces correctly. To account for the results of these experiments, a revision of the Chase-Simon theory is proposed. It is suggested that chess players, like experts in other recall tasks, use long-term memory retrieval structures (Chase & Ericsson, 1982) or templates in addition to chunks in short-term memory to store information rapidly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/cogp.1996.0011

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-08
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
1-40
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102495692
Cited by
622
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 27
FWCI
20.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
short-term memory capacity, long-term memory retrieval, templates
MeSH terms
Humans, Memory, Mental Recall, Templates, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review