Templates in chess memory: a mechanism for recalling several boards
Open accessAbstract
This paper addresses empirically and theoretically a question derived from the chunking theory of memory (Chase & Simon, 1973a, 1973b): To what extent is skilled chess memory limited by the size of short-term memory (about seven chunks)? This question is addressed first with an experiment where subjects, ranking from class A players to grandmasters, are asked to recall up to five positions presented during 5 s each. Results show a decline of percentage of recall with additional boards, but also show that expert players recall more pieces than is predicted by the chunking theory in its original form. A second experiment shows that longer latencies between the presentation of boards facilitate recall. In a third experiment, a Chessmaster gradually increases the number of boards he can reproduce with higher than 70% average accuracy to nine, replacing as many as 160 pieces correctly. To account for the results of these experiments, a revision of the Chase-Simon theory is proposed. It is suggested that chess players, like experts in other recall tasks, use long-term memory retrieval structures (Chase & Ericsson, 1982) or templates in addition to chunks in short-term memory to store information rapidly.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Context affects performance.
“Context affects performance.”
From Context Stability in Habit Building Increases Automaticity and Goal Attainment (2022) · cites this paper as Gobet and Simon, 1996
Cites
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479 · see citing works
Self-citationAcquisition of a memory skill.
Ericsson, K. A., Chase, W. G., & Faloon, S. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7375930 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
A simulation of memory for chess positions
Simon, H. A., & Gilmartin, K. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90024-8 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Self-citationExpert Chess Memory: Revisiting the Chunking Hypothesis
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1998) · Memory · doi:10.1080/741942359 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Self-citationSTM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and acoustical loop hypotheses
Zhang, G., & Simon, H. A. (1985) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197681 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779 · see citing works
Expert Chess Memory: Revisiting the Chunking Hypothesis
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1998) · Memory · doi:10.1080/741942359 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Self-citationDoes Far Transfer Exist? Negative Evidence From Chess, Music, and Working Memory Training
Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2017) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417712760 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Self-citationCognitive Training Does Not Enhance General Cognition
Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.004 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Self-citationVideo game training does not enhance cognitive ability: A comprehensive meta-analytic investigation
Sala, G., Tatlidil, K. S., & Gobet, F. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000139 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Self-citationReconsidering the Trade-off Between Expertise and Flexibility: a Cognitive Entrenchment Perspective
Dane, E. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.35.4.zok579 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Rethinking expertise: a multifactorial gene–environment interaction model of expert performance.
Ullén, F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Mosing, M. A. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000033 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Working memory training in typically developing children: A multilevel meta-analysis
Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2020) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01681-y · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationKiesel, A., Kunde, W., Pohl, C., Berner, M. P., & Hoffmann, J. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0014499 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Sala, G., Aksayli, N. D., Tatlidil, K. S., Gondo, Y., & Gobet, F. (2019) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.101386 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationWine experts’ recognition of wine odors is not verbally mediated
Croijmans, I., Arshamian, A., Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000949 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Context Stability in Habit Building Increases Automaticity and Goal Attainment
Stojanovic, M., Grund, A., & Fries, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883795 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- ORCID
- Gobet, Fernand
- Venue
- Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-40
- ISSN
- 0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102495692
- Cited by
- 622
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 20.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- bura.brunel.ac.uk
- Locations
- Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- short-term memory capacity, long-term memory retrieval, templates
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Memory, Mental Recall, Templates, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review