Cited by 129Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyParanormal Experiences and BeliefsEvolution and Science Education

Why did this happen to me? Religious believers’ and non-believers’ teleological reasoning about life events

Banerjee, Konika, Bloom, Paul·2014·Cognition

Abstract

People often believe that significant life events happen for a reason. In three studies, we examined evidence for the view that teleological beliefs reflect a general cognitive bias to view the world in terms of agency, purpose, and design. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that individual differences in mentalizing ability predicted both the tendency to believe in fate (Study 1) and to infer purposeful causes of one's own life events (Study 2). In addition, people's perception of purpose in life events was correlated with their teleological beliefs about nature, but this relationship was driven primarily by individuals' explicit religious and paranormal beliefs (Study 3). Across all three studies, we found that while people who believe in God hold stronger teleological beliefs than those who do not, there is nonetheless evidence of teleological beliefs among non-believers, confirming that the perception of purpose in life events does not rely on theistic belief. These findings suggest that the tendency to perceive design and purpose in life events-while moderated by theistic belief-is not solely a consequence of culturally transmitted religious ideas. Rather, this teleological bias has its roots in certain more general social propensities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.017

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In many domains of everyday life people appeal to both natural and supernatural explanations, often integrating both types of explanation.

    “in many domains of everyday life people appeal to both natural and supernatural explanations, often integrating both types of explanation.”

    From The Challenge of Evolution to Religion (2019) · cites this paper as Banerjee and Bloom (2014)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banerjee, K., & Bloom, P.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Banerjee, Konika
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
133
Issue
1
Pages
277-303
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095563956
Cited by
129
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
Keywords
teleological reasoning, belief in fate, mentalization, religious beliefs, supernatural beliefs, non-believers, theistic belief, causal attribution, design perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Culture, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Religion and Psychology, Thinking, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review