Cited by 210Barrier Structure and Function StudiesDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

TNFα Transport across the Blood–Brain Barrier Is Abolished in Receptor Knockout Mice

Pan, Weihong, Kastin, Abba J.·2002·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

The presence of transport systems at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) enables some cytokines in blood to reach specific targets in the brain and spinal cord. The "transporters" function in a way different from conventional receptors, in that cytokines are chaperoned from blood to the CNS rather than being degraded in the specialized endothelial cells composing the BBB. Here we present the first study to determine whether the transporter for tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) is identical to its receptors. Three types of TNFalpha receptor knockout mice were used, and the influx of (125)I-TNFalpha from blood to brain and blood to spinal cord was measured. In either p55 or p75 receptor knockout mice, the influx of (125)I-TNFalpha was significantly, but not completely, decreased in spinal cord, whereas the decrease in brain was not statistically significant. This indicates that both receptors are partially involved in the transport of TNFalpha across the BBB but that neither receptor is the sole transporter. By contrast, in double knockout mice lacking both p55 and p75 receptors, the entry of (125)I-TNFalpha into brain and spinal cord was completely abolished. Therefore, both receptors are necessary for transporting TNFalpha across the BBB. The results clearly demonstrate that the transport of TNFalpha across the BBB is a complicated process involving additive or even synergistic activities of both receptors, thus differing from typical ligand-receptor binding and downstream signal transduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/exnr.2002.7871

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pan, W., & Kastin, A. J.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Pan, Weihong
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
174
Issue
2
Pages
193-200
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023830686
Cited by
210
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA12865, R01AA012865)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-54880)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
TNF-α, blood-brain barrier, cytokine transport, TNF receptor p55, TNF receptor 2, receptor knockout mice, spinal cord, brain, endothelial cells, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Iodine Radioisotopes, Spinal Cord, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Antigens, CD, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Mice, Knockout, Protein Transport, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type II, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review