The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anonymity versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02043 · Cited by 3,475
The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1082976 · Cited by 3,375
The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks
Boccaletti, S., Bianconi, G., Criado, R., del Genio, C. I., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Romance, M., Sendiña-Nadal, I., Wang, Z., & Zanin, M. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.07.001 · Cited by 3,125
“Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000142 · Cited by 1,898
Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion.
Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.187 · Cited by 1,424
Psychological foundations of incentives
Fehr, E., & Falk, A. (2002) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/s0014-2921(01)00208-2 · Cited by 1,240
Sigmund, K., Hauert, C., & Nowak, M. A. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.161155698 · Cited by 644
Learning in High Stakes Ultimatum Games: An Experiment in the Slovak Republic
Slonim, R., & Roth, A. E. (1998) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2998575 · Cited by 512
Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness.
Bolton, G. E., Katok, E., & Zwick, R. (1998) · International Journal of Game Theory · doi:10.1007/s001820050072 · Cited by 480
Self-citationAudience effects on moralistic punishment
Kurzban, R., DeScioli, P., & O'Brien, E. (2007) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.06.001 · Cited by 360
Doris, J. M., & The Moral Psychology Research Group (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582143.001.0001 · Cited by 227
Crockett, M. J., Clark, L., Lieberman, M. D., Tabibnia, G., & Robbins, T. W. (2010) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0019861 · Cited by 159
Mentalizing in economic decision-making
POLEZZI, D., DAUM, I., RUBALTELLI, E., LOTTO, L., CIVAI, C., SARTORI, G., & RUMIATI, R. (2008) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.003 · Cited by 148
A hypothesis of the co-evolution of cooperation and responses to inequity
Brosnan, S. F. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00043 · Cited by 134
Fairness violations elicit greater punishment on behalf of another than for oneself
FeldmanHall, O., Sokol-Hessner, P., Van Bavel, J. J., & Phelps, E. A. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6306 · Cited by 106
Haruno, M., Kimura, M., & Frith, C. D. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00589 · Cited by 102
Fletcher, G. E. (2008) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.20576 · Cited by 87
When people matter more than money: An ERPs study
Rigoni, D., Polezzi, D., Rumiati, R., Guarino, R., & Sartori, G. (2010) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.12.003 · Cited by 73
Evolution of altruistic punishment in heterogeneous populations
de Weerd, H., & Verbrugge, R. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.08.034 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolton, G. E., & Zwick, R.
- Venue
- Games and Economic Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-121
- ISSN
- 0899-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032439493
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.