Cited by 127Stress Responses and CortisolRegulation of Appetite and ObesityAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Glucose but Not Protein or Fat Load Amplifies the Cortisol Response to Psychosocial Stress

Gonzalez-Bono, Esperanza, Rohleder, Nicolas, Hellhammer, Dirk H., Salvador, Alicia, Kirschbaum, Clemens·2002·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

We previously reported that glucose intake amplifies cortisol response to psychosocial stress and smoking in healthy young men, while low blood glucose levels prevented the stress-induced activation of the hypothalamus pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis. However, it remains unknown whether this modulation is specific for glucose load or a more common effect of energy availability. To elucidate this question, 37 healthy men, who fasted for at least 8 h before the experiment, were randomly assigned to four experimental groups, who received glucose (n = 8), protein (n = 10), fat (n = 10), and water (n = 9), one h before their exposure to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Blood glucose levels were measured at baseline and following stress, while salivary cortisol was assessed repeatedly measured before after the TSST. The results show that both absolute cortisol levels and net cortisol increase were greater in the glucose group in comparison to the other groups (F(3,33) = 3.00, P < 0.05 and F(3,33) = 3.08, P < 0.05, respectively. No group differences were observed with respect to perceived stress and mood. Furthermore, the cortisol response was positively correlated with blood glucose changes (r = 0.49, P < 0.002). In conclusion, the results suggest a central mechanism responsible for regulation of energy balance and HPA axis activation, rather than peripheral mechanisms. We thus recommend controlling for blood glucose levels when studying HPA axis responsiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1766

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gonzalez-Bono, E., Rohleder, N., Hellhammer, D. H., Salvador, A., & Kirschbaum, C.
Affiliations
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Universität Trier (DE)
  • Universitat de València (ES)
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
328-333
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158139100
Cited by
127
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
glucose load, cortisol response, psychosocial stress, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, energy availability, blood glucose, protein intake, dietary fat intake, Trier Social Stress Test, salivary cortisol, stress hormones, energy balance
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Glucose, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Male, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Saliva, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review