Cited by 963Stress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Why do we respond so differently? Reviewing determinants of human salivary cortisol responses to challenge

Kudielka, Brigitte M., Hellhammer, D.H., Wüst, Stefan·2009·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Stress and stress-related health impairments are major problems in human life and elucidating the biological pathways linking stress and disease is of substantial importance. However, the identification of mechanisms underlying a dysregulation of major components of the stress response system is, particularly in humans, a very challenging task. Salivary cortisol responses to diverse acute challenge paradigms show large intra- and interindividual variability. In order to uncover mechanisms mediating stress-related disorders and to potentially develop new therapeutic strategies, an extensive phenotyping of HPA axis stress responses is essential. Such a research agenda depends on substantial knowledge of moderating and intervening variables that affect cortisol responses to different stressors and stimuli. The aim of this report is, therefore, to provide a comprehensive summary of important determinants of, in particular, human salivary cortisol responses to different kinds of laboratory stimuli including acute psychosocial stress as well as pharmacological provocation procedures. This overview demonstrates the role of age and gender, endogenous and exogenous sex steroid levels, pregnancy, lactation and breast-feeding, smoking, coffee and alcohol consumption as well as dietary energy supply in salivary cortisol responses to acute stress. Furthermore, it briefly summarizes current knowledge of the role of genetic factors and methodological issues in terms of habituation to repeated psychosocial stress exposures and time of testing as well as psychological factors, that have been shown to be associated with salivary cortisol responses like early life experiences, social factors, psychological interventions, personality as well as acute subjective-psychological stress responses and finally states of chronic stress and psychopathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.004

Cites

239 of 239 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among studies using the TSST, there is some agreement that under stress, cortisol increases are greater in the luteal phase relative to other phases in women not taking oral contraceptives.

    “In general, among the studies that used the TSST as a form of mental stress to activate the HPA axis, there seems to be some agreement that when under stress, cortisol increases are greater in the luteal phase relative to the other phases in women who are not taking OC (e.g., Kudielka et al., 2009; Rohleder et al., 2001; Rohleder et al., 2003; Schoof and Wolf, 2009).”
  • In public speaking tasks, sex differences in HPA responsivity are inconsistent; when found, they indicate stronger responses in men, though women show increased cortisol response in the luteal phase.

    “In public speaking tasks, sex differences in HPA responsivity show an inconsistent pattern; when effects are found, they indicate stronger responses in men, although women show increased cortisol response in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (Kajantie and Phillips, 2006; Kudielka and Kirshbaum, 2005; Kudielka et al., 2009)”

    From The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2011) · cites this paper as Kudielka et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 241 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kudielka, B. M., Hellhammer, D. H., & Wüst, S.
Affiliations
  • Constructor University (DE)
  • Universität Trier (DE)
  • Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
Corresponding author
Kudielka, Brigitte M.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
2-18
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057119719
Cited by
963
References
241
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 60
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
salivary cortisol, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, acute psychosocial stress, sex steroids, age and gender differences, pregnancy and lactation, smoking, energy intake, genetic factors, early life experience, personality, chronic stress, psychopathology
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Breast Feeding, Nonprescription Drugs, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Lactation, Life Change Events, Male, Personality, Pregnancy, Saliva, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review