Cited by 231Stress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and DisordersCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Diurnal cortisol peaks and their relationships to meals

LEGLER, MARGUERITE, BRANDENBERGER, GABRIELLE, HIETTER, BERNARD, SIMÉONI, MICHÉLE, REINHARDT, BÉATRICE·1982·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Relationships between diurnal plasma cortisol peaks and meals were evaluated for 30 male subjects divided into 5 groups. At 1300 h, at the time of a slow increase of plasma cortisol in fasting subjects, a reproducible rapidly increasing meal-related peak appeared in all subjects studied. An identical meal at 2000 h led to a lower mean response, with larger interindividual variations. This attenuated evening response does not seem attributable to any daily rhythm in responsiveness nor to changing basal levels, since only slight nonsignificant rises in cortisol appeared after an identical meal at 1000 h. The usual mean cortisol pattern with a midday peak was observed in subjects accustomed to different activity and meal-time schedules, which excludes the role of dietary habits. Satiety did not seen to play a determining role in the response to the 1000 h meal, as was shown by comparing subjects who did or did not have breakfast after overnight fasting. Meal intake was not necessary to provoke peaking in cortisol levels, and it has been established that neural and behavioral factors associated with meal presentation play a predominant role in some subjects. The results given clear evidence of the influence of meal timing on the daily plasma cortisol pattern, but no clue was found as to why eating affects the pituitary-adrenal axis differently according to the time of day. The noon meal may at least have a synchronizing role on normally existing plasma cortisol fluctuations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem-55-4-757

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LEGLER, M., BRANDENBERGER, G., HIETTER, B., SIMÉONI, M., & REINHARDT, B.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1982-10
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
757-761
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2040583831
Cited by
231
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
diurnal cortisol rhythm, meal timing, plasma cortisol, pituitary-adrenal axis, circadian rhythm, satiety, breakfast, interindividual variability
MeSH terms
Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Food, Food Deprivation, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review