CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 536

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can computers be teammates?

Nass, Clifford, Fogg, B.J., Moon, Youngme·1996·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
DOI 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0073
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigated the claim that humans will readily form team relationships with computers. Drawing from the group dynamic literature in human-human interactions, a laboratory experiment ( n =56) manipulated identity and interdependence to create team affiliation in a human-computer interaction. The data show that subjects who are told they are interdependent with the computer affiliate with the computer as a team. The data also show that the effects of being in a team with a computer are the same as the effects of being in a team with another human: subjects in the interdependence conditions perceived the computer to be more similar to themselves, saw themselves as more cooperative, were more open to influence from the computer, thought the information from the computer was of higher quality, found the information from the computer friendlier, and conformed more to the computer's information. Subjects in the identity conditions showed neither team affiliation nor the effects of team affiliation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0073

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y.
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-12
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
669-678
ISSN
1071-5819
DOI
10.1006/ijhc.1996.0073
Cited by
536
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review