Trusting a Virtual Driver That Looks, Acts, and Thinks Like You
Abstract
Objective: We examined whether participants would trust an agent that was similar to them more than an agent that was dissimilar to them. Background: Trust is an important psychological factor determining the acceptance of smart systems. Because smart systems tend to be treated like humans, and similarity has been shown to increase trust in humans, we expected that similarity would increase trust in a virtual agent. Methods: In a driving simulator experiment, participants ( N = 111) were presented with a virtual agent that was either similar to them or not. This agent functioned as their virtual driver in a driving simulator, and trust in this agent was measured. Furthermore, we measured how trust changed with experience. Results: Prior to experiencing the agent, the similar agent was trusted more than the dissimilar agent. This effect was mediated by perceived similarity. After experiencing the agent, the similar agent was still trusted more than the dissimilar agent. Conclusion: Just as similarity between humans increases trust in another human, similarity also increases trust in a virtual agent. When such an agent is presented as a virtual driver in a self-driving car, it could possibly enhance the trust people have in such a car. Application: Displaying a virtual driver that is similar to the human driver might increase trust in a self-driving car.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the context of both autonomous vehicles and virtual agents, people showed more trust in AIs with human characteristics than without.
“For example, in the context of both autonomous vehicles and virtual agents, people showed more trust in AIs with human characteristics than without [41-43].”
From Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,542 · see citing works
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532 · see citing works
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971 · see citing works
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117 · see citing works
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810 · see citing works
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Overtrust represents a situation in which trust exceeds the capabilities of the system, whereas undertrust represents a situation in which trust falls short of the capabilities of the system (Lee & See, 2004).”
BackgroundTrust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548 · see citing works
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · Cited by 5,157 · see citing works
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3702 · Cited by 4,870 · see citing works
The chameleon effect: the perception–behavior link and social interaction
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 · Cited by 3,674 · see citing works
Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination
Tajfel, H. (1970) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96 · Cited by 2,577 · see citing works
Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?
Svenson, O. (1981) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(81)90005-6 · Cited by 1,969 · see citing works
The functional basis of face evaluation
Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805664105 · Cited by 1,819 · see citing works
Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems
Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000) · International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics · doi:10.1207/s15327566ijce0401_04 · Cited by 1,799 · see citing works
Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems
LEE, J., & MORAY, N. (1992) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139208967392 · Cited by 1,459 · see citing works
Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism
Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420090207 · Cited by 1,291 · see citing works
MUIR, B. M., & MORAY, N. (1996) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139608964474 · Cited by 993 · see citing works
Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1025389814290 · Cited by 960 · see citing works
Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception
Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G. T., & Roth, C. (2000) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/0272-4332.203034 · Cited by 905 · see citing works
MUIR, B. M. (1994) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139408964957 · Cited by 873 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…is a crucial psychological factor that determines whether or not humans are willing to hand over control to that technology (e.g., Lee & Moray, 1992; Muir, 1994; Muir & Moray, 1996), because trust is necessary in a situation that is characterized by uncertainty and vulnerability (Lee & See, 2004).”
BackgroundIs actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407508096700 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., & Moon, Y. (1996) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1996.0073 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Bailenson (2005) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01619.x · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Facial resemblance enhances trust
DeBruine, L. M. (2002) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2034 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Why Susie sells seashells by the seashore: Implicit egotism and major life decisions.
Pelham, B. W., Mirenberg, M. C., & Jones, J. T. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.469 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Verberne, F. M. F., Ham, J. R. C., & Midden, C. J. H. (2012) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720812443825 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Self-citationde Vries, P., Midden, C., & Bouwhuis, D. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00039-9 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Self-citationMaddux, W. W., Mullen, E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.003 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
The impact of positive mood on trust in interpersonal and intergroup interactions.
Lount, R. B. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017344 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2002) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.38 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
New Information and Social Trust: Asymmetry and Perseverance of Attributions about Hazard Managers
Cvetkovich, G. T., Siegrist, M., Murray, R., & Tragesser, S. L. (2002) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/0272-4332.00030 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Reversed facial images and the mere-exposure hypothesis.
Mita, T. H., Dermer, M. L., & Knight, J. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.8.597 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
The relative frequency of unsafe driving acts in serious traffic crashes
Hendricks, D. L. ;. F. (2001) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e440112008-001 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Shared Values, Social Trust, and the Perception of Geographic Cancer Clusters
Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G. T., & Gutscher, H. (2001) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/0272-4332.216173 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Tri-level study of the causes of traffic accidents: final report. Executive summary.
Treat, J. R., Tumbas, N. S., McDonald, S. T., et al. (1979) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Differential neural responses to faces physically similar to the self as a function of their valence
Verosky, S. C., & Todorov, A. T. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.017 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Farmer, H., McKay, R., & Manos Tsakiris, A. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613494852 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Trusting Digital Chameleons: The Effect of Mimicry by a Virtual Social Agent on User Trust
Verberne, F. M. F., Ham, J. R. C., Ponnada, A., & Midden, C. J. H. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37157-8_28 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research
Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0057 · Cited by 2,921 · see citing works
Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.
de Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., McKendrick, R., Smith, M. A. B., McKnight, P. E., Krueger, F., & Parasuraman, R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000092 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience
Chiou, E. K., & Lee, J. D. (2023) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211009995 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
How can humans understand their automated cars? HMI principles, problems and solutions
Carsten, O., & Martens, M. H. (2019) · Cognition, Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-018-0484-0 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy
Placani, A. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00419-4 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
“For example, in the context of both autonomous vehicles and virtual agents, people showed more trust in AIs with human characteristics than without [41–43].”
Hong, J.-W., Wang, Y., & Lanz, P. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1785693 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Behavioral Measurement of Trust in Automation: The Trust Fall
Miller, D., Johns, M., Mok, B., Gowda, N., Sirkin, D., Lee, K., & Ju, W. (2016) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213601422 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Chen, J., Mishler, S., Hu, B., Li, N., & Proctor, R. W. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.05.010 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Verberne, F. M. F., Ham, J., & Midden, C. J. H.
- Affiliations
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- ORCID
- Ham, Jaap
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-04-28
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 895-909
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W2108466201
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Keywords
- similarity, virtual driver, autonomous vehicles, human-agent interaction, perceived similarity, driving simulator
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Automobile Driving, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, User-Computer Interface, Trust
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
