The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, our finding does not affirm the weakening of interdependence with increasing age predicted by the RHM framework (Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Yang et al., 2017).”
From Linguistic interdependence of receptive vocabulary skills in emergent bilingual preschool children: Exploring a factor-dependent approach (2019) · cites this paper as Kroll & Stewart, 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,003
Kiran, S., & Iakupova, R. (2011) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.3109/02699206.2011.566664 · Cited by 54
“When these results are fit into the context of the extant theoretical framework (Kroll and Stewart, 1994), it is reasoned that for individuals with relative differences in proficiency between the two languages, connections between the more proficient language (e.g. English) and the conceptual…”
BackgroundDesmet, T., & Duyck, W. (2007) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00008.x · Cited by 74
“For instance, Kroll and Stewart (1994) manipulated the semantic coherence within word lists that were presented for translation: some lists contained words from a single semantic category (e.g. fruits), whereas other lists contained words from different categories (e.g. fruits, clothes, animals).”
BackgroundMethodDuyck, W., Diependaele, K., Drieghe, D., & Brysbaert, M. (2004) · Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.51.2.116 · Cited by 54
“This assumption was also made in more recent models of bilingualism, such as the word association model, the concept mediation model (Potter, So, Von Eckardt, & Feldman, 1984), and the revised hierarchical model of Kroll and Stewart (1994).”
BackgroundMethodIbáñez, A. M., Kühne, K., Miklashevsky, A. A., Monaco, E. L., Muraki, E. J., Ranzini, M., Speed, L. J., & Tuena, C. (2023) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.228 · Cited by 65
Francis, W., & Gutiérrez, M. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0163-3 · Cited by 53
“Existing theories of bilingual lexical processing, including the revised hierarchical model (Kroll & Stewart, 1994), the bilingual interactive activation model (Dijkstra & Van Heuven, 2002), and the inhibitory control model (Green, 1998), all include the feature that associations between words and…”
MethodTesting asymmetries in noncognate translation priming: Evidence from RTs and ERPs
Schoonbaert, S., Holcomb, P., Grainger, J., & Hartsuiker, R. (2011) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01048.x · Cited by 53
“The stronger N250 translation priming effect from L2 to L1 than from L1 to L2 in the present study might also be driven by asymmetries in the connection strengths between the word form representations of translation equivalents, as postulated in the RHM (Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe time course of conceptual processing in three bilingual populations
Mcelree, B., Jia, G., & Litvak, A. (2000) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2677 · Cited by 53
The Cognitive Science of Bilingualism
Dong, Y., & Li, P. (2015) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12099 · Cited by 90
Cognitive control in bilinguals: Proficiency and code-switching both matter
Kheder, S., & Kaan, E. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104575 · Cited by 83
Semantic processing during language production: an update of the swinging lexical network
Rahman, R. A., & Melinger, A. (2019) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2019.1599970 · Cited by 57
“…repeatedly presented in blocks consisting of semantically homogeneous or heterogeneous objects (e.g., Belke, Meyer, & Damian, 2005; Damian & Als, 2005; Damian, Vigliocco, & Levelt, 2001; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Schnur, Schwartz, Brecher, & Hodgson, 2006; Vigliocco, Vinson, Damian, & Levelt, 2002).”
The influence of proficiency and language combination on bilingual lexical access
Kastenbaum, J. G., Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Sheng, L., Mavis, I., Sebastian-Vaytadden, R., Rangamani, G., Vallila-Rohter, S., & Kiran, S. (2018) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728918000366 · Cited by 52
“Consistent with the theoretical models discussed earlier in the introduction (particularly the RHM and revised RHM), they highlight that the lower the proficiency in a language, the lower lexical access in that language.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe gender congruency effect during bilingual spoken-word recognition
Morales, L., Paolieri, D., Dussias, P. E., Kroff, J. R. V., Gerfen, C., & Bajo, M. (2015) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728915000176 · Cited by 52
“Address for Correspondence: Luis Morales, Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain luismorales@ugr.es different lexical entries (De Groot, 1993; Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
Backgroundde Zubicaray, G., Johnson, K., Howard, D., & Mcmahon, K. (2014) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.018 · Cited by 52
Costa, A., Calabria, M., Marne, P., Hernández, M., Juncadella, M., Gascón‐Bayarri, J., Lleó, A., Ortiz‐Gil, J., Ugas, L., Blesa, R., et al. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.008 · Cited by 58
Cremer, M., Dingshoff, D., de Beer, M., & Schoonen, R. (2011) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/1367006910381189 · Cited by 52
“The Revised Hierarchical Model (RHM), developed by Kroll and Stewart (1994), also contains a lexical and a conceptual store.”
BackgroundMethodFrancis, W., & Gallard, S. L. K. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03206447 · Cited by 52
“These patterns are consistent with the translation asymmetries observed in previous studies with less balanced bilinguals (Francis et al., 2004; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Sholl et al., 1995).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPsycholinguistic perspectives on second language learning and bilingualism
Kroll, J. F., BOGULSKI, C. A., & McClain, R. (2012) · Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/lab.2.1.01kro · Cited by 73
“2.1 Parallel activation of the bilingual’s two languages When adults learn a second language past early childhood, the established L1 is thought to influence the ability to access lexical and grammatical information in the newly developing L2 (e.g. Kroll & Stewart, 1994; MacWhinney, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBilingual language switching costs in auditory comprehension
Olson, D. J. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1250927 · Cited by 60
“…to theories regarding the cognitive mechanisms involved in language switching and language selection (e.g. for Inhibitory Control, see Green, 1986, 1998; Kroll & Stewart, 1994), it is worth nothing that the majority of this work has relied on production-oriented experimental paradigms.”
BackgroundSpecifying the role of the left prefrontal cortex in word selection
Riès, S., Karzmark, C. R., Navarrete, E., Knight, R. T., & Dronkers, N. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.007 · Cited by 51
“…word selection caused by the repetitive prior retrieval of words from the same semantic category (Belke, Meyer, & Damian, 2005; Damian et al., 2001; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Rahman & Melinger, 2009; although see Janssen, Carreiras, & Barber, 2011; Janssen, Hernández-Cabrera, van der Meij, & Barber,…”
BackgroundBrain Oscillations and Functional Connectivity during Overt Language Production
Ewald, A., Aristei, S., Nolte, G., & Rahman, R. A. (2012) · Front. Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00166 · Cited by 51
“…with a semantic blocking paradigm in which pictures of objects are named in categorically homogeneous or heterogeneous blocks of trials (e.g., Kroll and Stewart, 1994; Damian et al., 2001; Belke et al., 2005), assuming that this task taps into lexical-semantic processing stages during…”
BackgroundElectrophysiological effects of semantic context in picture and word naming
Janssen, N., Carreiras, M., & Barber, H. A. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.015 · Cited by 48
“Second, given that naming latencies in the semantic blocking task are generally slower for pictures than forword stimuli (e.g., Kroll and Stewart, 1994), onewould expect a later onset of the semantic context effect for pictures than for words, if the effect was occurring at output stages of the…”
Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., Sneg, R., & Baruch, O. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.2.336 · Cited by 51
de Groot, A. D., & Comijs, H. (1995) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00449.x · Cited by 51
Mishra, R., & Singh, N. (2014) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9436-5 · Cited by 51
“The results extend previous findings that suggest language non- selective access of orthographic information in bilinguals where the languages are different in terms of their phonological and orthographic structures (Lagrou et al., 2011; Thierry & Wu, 2010). Our results expand earlier findings with monolinguals that h…”
ResultNeural overlap of L1 and L2 semantic representations in speech: A decoding approach
Putte, E. V. D., Baene, W. D., Brass, M., & Duyck, W. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.082 · Cited by 50
Cognate Costs in Bilingual Speech Production: Evidence from Language Switching
Broersma, M., Carter, D., & Acheson, D. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01461 · Cited by 55
“In speech production, cognates are translated faster than non-cognates (Kroll and Stewart, 1994; Christoffels et al., 2006).”
BackgroundLanguage control in bilinguals: Intention to speak vs. execution of speech
Reverberi, C., Kuhlen, A. K., Abutalebi, J., Greulich, R. S., Costa, A., Seyed‐Allaei, S., & Haynes, J. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.004 · Cited by 75
On abduction in receptive multilingualism. Evidence from cognate guessing tasks
Berthele, R. (2011) · doi:10.1515/9783110239331.191 · Cited by 50
“As schematically represented in Figure 10, inspired by the revised hierarchical model (Kroll and Stewart 1994), I would like to suggest that multilinguals with such highly developed dia-systems – be they due to proficiency in two Romance languages or to proficiency in a Germanic dialect and a…”
BackgroundPhonology in the bilingual Stroop effect
Sumiya, H., & Healy, A. (2004) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03195865 · Cited by 50
“…(see Figure 1): a lexical level, which consists of two distinct and independent lexicons, and a conceptual level, which is shared by the two languages (see, e.g., Kolers, 1966; Kroll, Michael, & Sankaranarayanan, 1998; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Potter, So, Von Eckardt, & Feldman, 1984).”
BackgroundThe Nature of Lexical-Semantic Access in Bilingual Aphasia
Kiran, S., Balachandran, I., & Lucas, J. (2014) · Behavioural Neurology · doi:10.1155/2014/389565 · Cited by 49
Elston-Güttler, K. E., & Williams, J. N. (2008) · doi:10.1177/0267658307086300 · Cited by 49
“(Kroll and Stewart, 1994) and continue to affect processing even after direct form–meaning connections have been established.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialA Cognitive Approach to Source Text Difficulty in Translation
Campbell, S. (1999) · doi:10.1075/target.11.1.03cam · Cited by 49
Uncovering the architecture of action semantics.
Watson, C. E., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0037449 · Cited by 47
Language conflict in translation: An ERP study of translation production
Christoffels, I. K., Ganushchak, L. Y., & Koester, D. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.821127 · Cited by 67
“The reason is that some more recent studies did not obtain the asymmetry predicted by the RHM (e.g., Christoffels, de Groot, & Kroll, 2006; Christoffels, de Groot, & Waldorp, 2003; de Groot & Poot, 1997; La Heij et al., 1996), most likely due to improved L2 proficiency levels among students.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialUsing Multimedia Vocabulary Annotations in L2 Reading and Listening Activities
Xu, J. (2010) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.27.2.311-327 · Cited by 48
Rahman, R. A., & Melinger, A. (2009) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960802648491 · Cited by 42
“…to account for these effects incorporate some aspect of lexical competition (e.g., Abdel Rahman & Melinger, 2008; Damian & Als, 2005; Dell, Oppenheim, & Kittredge, 2008; Howard et al., 2006; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Oppenheim, Dell, & Schwartz, 2007; Vigliocco et al., 2004). experimental paradigms.”
BackgroundFalse memory in bilinguals: does switching languages increase false memories?
Marmolejo, G., Diliberto-Macaluso, K. A., & Altarriba, J. (2009) · American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/27784371 · Cited by 48
The effect of enhanced lexical retrieval on second language writing: A classroom experiment
Snellings, P., van Gelderen, A. V., & Glopper, D. (2004) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716404001092 · Cited by 48
“Although the order in which the components of the process are active is reversed in lexical access and lexical retrieval, most components are interchangeable (Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999).”
BackgroundA human right to literacy education: Implications for serving Syrian refugee children
Wofford, M. C., & Tibi, S. (2017) · International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1080/17549507.2017.1397746 · Cited by 56
“Strengthening competencies in L1 influences learning to read in L2 which in turn promotes linkage between L2 and conceptual knowledge (Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Paradis et al., 2011; Perozzi & Sanchez, 1992).”
BackgroundBilinguals’ Existing Languages Benefit Vocabulary Learning in a Third Language
Bartolotti, J., & Marian, V. (2016) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12200 · Cited by 61
“In the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing, these word-to-word associations are strongest at the onset of L2 learning (Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundMeyer, A., Snider, S., Eckmann, C. B., & Friedman, R. (2015) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1028327 · Cited by 47
“These findings, and the findings of the current study, are consistent with the hypothesis that semantic representations are shared across languages (Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Kroll, Van Hell, Tokowicz, & Green, 2010).”
ResultMiwa, K., Dijkstra, T., Bolger, P., & Baayen, R. (2014) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728913000576 · Cited by 47
“To safe-guard against potential individual differences (Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Potter, So, von Eckhardt, & Feldman, 1984), we considered log-transformed participants’ months of stay away from Japan (LengthOfStayCanada) as a measure of L2 English proficiency.”
BackgroundComesaña, M., Soares, A., Sánchez-Casas, R., & Lima, C. (2012) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02080.x · Cited by 47
Temporal Characteristics of Semantic Perseverations Induced by Blocked-Cyclic Picture Naming
Hsiao, E. Y., Schwartz, M., Schnur, T., & Dell, G. (2009) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.11.003 · Cited by 47
“The semantic blocked naming experiment that Schnur and colleagues conducted was inspired by similar experiments run with unimpaired speakers (e.g., Damian, Vigliocco, & Levelt, 2001; Kroll & Stewart, 1994) and individuals with aphasia (McCarthy & Kartsounis, 2000; Wilshire & McCarthy, 2002).”
MethodVoits, T., Pliatsikas, C., Robson, H., & Rothman, J. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107593 · Cited by 40
“Active bilingualism stands out as a good candidate due to its ubiquity in daily life coupled with the fact that both languages are always simultaneously active in the bilingual brain, and this constitutes a sustained, highly engaging mental exercise (e.g., Green, 1998; Kroll and Stewart, 1994; Spivey and Marian, 1999;…”
BackgroundSabourin, L., Brien, C., & Burkholder, M. (2014) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728913000643 · Cited by 46
Semantic Development in Spanish-English Bilingual Children: Effects of Age and Language Experience
Li, S., Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., & Fiestas, C. E. (2012) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12015 · Cited by 46
“With regard to experience, we hypothesized that in keeping with the RHM, the amount of language experience would affect the depth of semantic knowledge, resulting in an asymmetry in semantic depth between a bilingual’s more and less frequently used languages.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCarrasco-Ortíz, H., Midgley, K. J., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01333.x · Cited by 46
“The majority of current models of bilingual word recognition are framed in an interactive language system, in which words are processed on the basis of their orthographic, semantic, and phonological similarity across languages (Dijkstra & Van Heuven, 1998, 2002; but see Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundSemantic interaction in early and late bilinguals: all words are not created equally.
Gathercole, V. C. M., & Moawad, R. A. (2010) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728909990460 · Cited by 46
Left Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Processing of Words and Sentences
Nozari, N., & Thompson‐Schill, S. L. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407794-2.00046-8 · Cited by 78
“…DOG, HORSE, LION), they are named more slowly in the neurologically intact adults (Belke, Meyer, & Damian, 2005; Damian, Vigliocco, & Levelt, 2001; Kroll & Stewart, 1994) and with more errors in aphasic patients with left frontal lesions (McCarthy & Kartsounis, 2000; Schnur, Schwartz, Brecher, &…”
BackgroundHernandez, A. E., & Reyes, I. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.28.4.726 · Cited by 46
“The model presented by Kroll originally was termed the " revised hierarchical model " (Kroll, 1994; Kroll & de Groot, 1997; Kroll & Sholl, 1992; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Sholl et al., 1995).”
BackgroundMethodEl-Dakhs, D., & Altarriba, J. (2019) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-019-09647-w · Cited by 45
The relationship between language control and cognitive control in bilingual aphasia
Gray, T., & Kiran, S. (2016) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728915000061 · Cited by 45
Semantic feature analysis targeting verbs in a quadrilingual speaker with aphasia
Knoph, M. I. N., Lind, M., & Simonsen, H. (2015) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1049583 · Cited by 45
“Current models of bilingual language processing also agree that multilinguals have a shared conceptual system for both/all of their languages (Dijkstra & Van Heuven, 2002; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Pavlenko, 2009).”
BackgroundStroop effects from newly learned color words: effects of memory consolidation and episodic context
Geukes, S., Gaskell, M. G., & Zwitserlood, P. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00278 · Cited by 46
“Quite a few proposals have been offered for this aspect of second-language acquisition (e.g., Kroll and Stewart, 1994; Dijkstra and van Heuven, 2002).”
BackgroundMemory for emotional words in the first and the second language: Effects of the encoding task*
Ferré, P., Sánchez-Casas, R., & Fraga, I. (2012) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728912000314 · Cited by 45
“As Kroll and Stewart (1994) proposed and several studies have demonstrated (Ferré, SánchezCasas & Guasch, 2006; Guasch, Sánchez-Casas, Ferré & García-Albea, 2008; Talamas, Kroll & Dufour, 1999; Sunderman & Kroll, 2006), one of the most relevant variables modulating access to meaning from L2 words…”
BackgroundBilingualism and Creativity: Benefits in Convergent Thinking Come with Losses in Divergent Thinking
Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Fischer, R., & Christoffels, I. K. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00273 · Cited by 156
“As research with bilingual adults (Kroll and Stewart, 1994) and children (Bialystok, 1988) has revealed that the cognitive and linguistic consequences of bilingualism are more salient for those bilinguals who are relatively balanced in their proficiency, we only considered balanced bilinguals for the present study.”
BackgroundAcquired dyslexia in a turkish-english speaker
Raman, I., & Weekes, B. (2005) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/s11881-005-0005-8 · Cited by 45
Cross-language semantic influences in different script bilinguals
Degani, T., Prior, A., & Hajajra, W. (2017) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728917000311 · Cited by 44
Ma, F., Chen, P., Guo, T.-M., & Kroll, J. (2017) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.09.006 · Cited by 44
“Bilingual lexicon Meaning access L2 learners ERPs a b s t r a c t According to the Revised Hierarchical Model (Kroll & Stewart, 1994), second language (L2) learners initially access the meaning of L2 words via the L1 whereas advanced learners access meaning directly.”
MethodSelf-citationQu, Q.-Q., Zhang, Q.-F., & Damian, M. (2016) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.06.008 · Cited by 44
“This effect is commonly assumed to reside at the level of lexical access (see e.g., Damian, Vigliocco, & Levelt, 2001; Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundAlferink, I., & Gullberg, M. (2013) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s136672891300028x · Cited by 44
“…tradition, studies have observed properties of non-separability in the bilingual system, such as coactivation (e.g., Costa, 2004; De Bot, 2004; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Kroll & Sunderman, 2003; Marian, Spivey & Hirsch, 2003; Weinreich, 1953), and degrees of overlap in representations between…”
BackgroundProcessing cost associated with inflectional morphology in bilingual speakers
Portin, M., & Laine, M. (2001) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728901000128 · Cited by 44
“…vs. dependence of language-speci®c lexicons, the relationships between conceptual and lexical representations in bilingualism, and language switching mechanisms (e.g., Schreuder and Weltens, 1993; Kroll and Stewart, 1994; Brysbaert, Van Dyck and Van de Poel, 1999; Meuter and Allport, 1999).”
BackgroundGrammatical gender processing in bilinguals: An analytic review
Sá-Leite, A. R., Fraga, I., & Comesaña, M. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01596-8 · Cited by 43
Sins of omission are more likely to be forgiven in non-native speakers
Fairchild, S., & Anna Papafragou, A. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.010 · Cited by 79
Behavioral and electrophysiological signatures of word translation processes
Jost, L. B., Radman, N., Buetler, K. A., & Annoni, J. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.034 · Cited by 47
“Another possibility would be an interpretation in terms of the RHM model (Kroll and Stewart, 1994): L1-L2 translation requires mediation via the L1 translation equivalent, which then leads to the slower responses, especially in bilinguals who are not highly proficient, as is the case of the…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialBoada, R., Sánchez-Casas, R., Gavilán, J. M., García-Albea, J. E., & Tokowicz, N. (2012) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728912000223 · Cited by 43
“Translation direction has also been a variable of interest in the study of word translation because it is often found that translation from L1 to L2 is performed more slowly than translation in the reverse direction (e.g., Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Sánchez-Casas, Davis & García-Albea, 1992a).”
BackgroundGrammatical Gender Inhibition in Bilinguals
Morales, L., Paolieri, D., & Bajo, T. (2011) · Front. Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00284 · Cited by 43
“For that to occur, interference and competition between the two languages of the bilingual are required (Kroll and Stewart, 1994).”
InfluentialKambanaros, M. (2010) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687030902958332 · Cited by 43
“…after childhood, both lexical and conceptual connections are active during bilingual word processing, but the strength of the connections or associations differs according to the relative dominance of L1 over L2 (or vice versa) as well as the language proficiency in L2 (Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundThe representation of asymmetric grammatical gender systems in the bilingual mental lexicon
Klassen, R. (2016) · Probus · doi:10.1515/probus-2016-0002 · Cited by 43
The first- and second-language age of acquisition effect in first- and second-language book reading
Dirix, N., & Duyck, W. (2017) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.012 · Cited by 42
“…if one assumes that L2 translational equivalents are mapped onto the existing semantic representations that also serve L1 (Duyck & Brysbaert, 2004; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Van Hell & De Groot, 1998b), L2 processing should indeed be influenced by L1 AoA, because that measure reflects when the…”
BackgroundInfluentialCross-language neighborhood effects in learners indicative of an integrated lexicon
Meade, G., Midgley, K. J., Dijkstra, T., & Holcomb, P. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01184 · Cited by 42
“…L2 processing in nonproficient adult learners posit that words from each language are stored in separate lexicons, with cross-language lexical connections limited to translation equivalents (e.g., Grainger, Midgley, &Holcomb, 2010; Kroll, Van Hell, Tokowicz, & Green, 2010; Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
Partial productivity of linguistic constructions: Dynamic categorization and statistical preemption
Goldberg, A. E. (2016) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2016.17 · Cited by 53
Single and multiple object naming in healthy ageing
Belke, E., & Meyer, A. (2007) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960701461541 · Cited by 42
“Earlier studies have shown that speakers are slower to name sets of semantically related than unrelated objects (Kroll & Stewart, 1994 ; Damian, Vigliocco, & Levelt, 2001 ; see also de Zubicaray, McMahon, Eastburn, & Pringle, 2006 ).”
BackgroundFreedman, M., Martin, R. C., & Biegler, K. (2004) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643290342000528 · Cited by 42
Semantic access in number word translation: the role of crosslingual lexical similarity.
Duyck, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2008) · Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.2.102 · Cited by 42
Prevoo, M. J. L., Malda, M., Emmen, R. A. G., Yeniad, N., & Mesman, J. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12099 · Cited by 41
Mishra, R., & Singh, N. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1146725 · Cited by 41
“These diverse findings do not unequivocally support the developmental prediction of the RHM model as far as the issue of proficiency and translation activation is concerned.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDirection asymmetries in spoken and signed language interpreting
Nicodemus, B., & Emmorey, K. (2012) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728912000521 · Cited by 41
“For example, Kroll and Stewart (1994) argued that faster lexical translation times for L2 1 The terms “L1”, “L2”, “native language”, and “secondary language” are not without problems in the study of bilingualism (Romaine, 1995).”
BackgroundResultIntroducing Second Language Acquisition
Saville‐Troike, M. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511888830 · Cited by 195
Bilingual Cortical Control of Between- and Within-Language Competition
Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Rochanavibhata, S., Bradley, K., & Hernández, A. E. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12116-w · Cited by 40
Direct teaching of vocabulary after listening: is it worth the effort and what method is best?
Hennebry‐Leung, M., Rogers, V., Macaro, E., & Murphy, V. A. (2013) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2013.849751 · Cited by 43
“This would provide further evidence for the Kroll and Stewart (1994) model whereby L2 words are routed via L1 words in order to connect with a concept.”
BackgroundHow aging and bilingualism influence language processing
Rossi, E., & Diaz, M. T. (2016) · Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/lab.14029.ros · Cited by 55
“Among the models that have been proposed for bilingual language lexical access, the Revised Hierarchical Model -RHM- (Kroll and Stewart, 1994) proposes that bilinguals access translation equivalents both through concept-mediation and also through direct associative links.”
BackgroundJanssen, N., Hernandez-Cabrera, J. A., van der Meij, M., & Barber, H. A. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu092 · Cited by 38
Languages As Categories: Reframing the “One Language or Two” Question in Early Bilingual Development
Byers-Heinlein, K. (2014) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12055 · Cited by 40
An ERP study of inhibition of non-target languages in trilingual word production
Guo, T., Ma, F., & Liu, F. (2013) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.07.009 · Cited by 38
Repetition blindness and bilingual memory: Token individuation for translation equivalents
Altarriba, J., & Soltano, E. (1996) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03201095 · Cited by 40
The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition
Martín, R. M., & de León, C. M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315178127 · Cited by 109
“The processes in the sight translation task, conducted by students with no experience in professional translation or interpreting, were registered by eye tracker and audio recorder, supplemented by post-task retrospection data.”
Captioning and grammar learning in the L2 Spanish classroom
Cintrón-Valentín, M., García-Amaya, L., & Ellis, N. (2019) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2019.1615978 · Cited by 39
“…our production task required learners to translate the target words from their L1 to their L2, whereas in MonteroPerez et al. (2014), learners translated the target words from their L2 to their L1, a skill in which learners are typically faster and more accurate (e.g. Kroll and Stewart 1994).”
BackgroundIdentifying translation problems in English-Chinese sight translation
Su, W., & Li, D.-F. (2019) · Translation and Interpreting Studies · doi:10.1075/tis.00033.su · Cited by 39
Language Mediated Concept Activation in Bilingual Memory Facilitates Cognitive Flexibility
Kharkhurin, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01067 · Cited by 39
Word reading and translation in bilinguals: the impact of formal and informal translation expertise
García, A., Ibáñez, A., Huepe, D., Houck, A. L., Michon, M., Lezama, C. G., Chadha, S., & Rivera-Rei, Á. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01302 · Cited by 39
Expressions of emotion as mediated by context
Altarriba, J. (2008) · doi:10.1017/s1366728908003295 · Cited by 39
Repetition priming endurance in picture naming and translation: Contributions of component processes
Francis, W., & Sáenz, S. P. (2007) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193288 · Cited by 39
“There is a consensus that translation from the dominant to the nondominant language is concept mediated in fluent bilinguals (e.g., Chen & Leung, 1989; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Potter et al., 1984; Sholl et al., 1995).”
BackgroundInfluentialPeñaloza, C., Grasemann, U., Dekhtyar, M., Miikkulainen, R., & Kiran, S. (2019) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104643 · Cited by 38
“BiLex expands on our previously built DISLEX model (Miikkulainen, & Kiran, 2009) that incorporated aspects of the RHM of the organization of the bilingual lexicon (Kroll & Stewart, 1994), to simulate lexical access in healthy bilinguals.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Neurocognition of Translation and Interpreting
García, A. M. (2019) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.147 · Cited by 68
Rose, S. B., & Rahman, R. A. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1212081 · Cited by 39
“…1989; Hantsch, Jescheniak, & Schriefers, 2005; Schriefers, Meyer, & Levelt, 1990) or cyclic blocking paradigm (e.g. Belke, Meyer, & Damian, 2005; Damian & Als, 2005; Damian, Vigliocco, & Levelt, 2001; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Schnur, Schwartz, Brecher, & Hodgson, 2006; Vigliocco et al., 2002).”
Semantic activation in LSD: evidence from picture naming
Family, N., Vinson, D., Vigliocco, G., Kaelen, M., Bolstridge, M., Nutt, D., & Carhart-Harris, R. L. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1217030 · Cited by 52
Kootstra, G., & Doedens, W. (2016) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728916000420 · Cited by 38
Cumulative semantic interference for associative relations in language production
Rose, S. B., & Rahman, R. A. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.013 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E.
- Affiliations
- Mount Holyoke College (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-174
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008457707
- Cited by
- 2,656
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 123 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 184 · 2019: 184 · 2018: 155 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 128 · 2015: 132 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 131
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- bilingual translation, picture naming, word retrieval, semantic classification, word naming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review