The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, our finding does not affirm the weakening of interdependence with increasing age predicted by the RHM framework (Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Yang et al., 2017).”
From Linguistic interdependence of receptive vocabulary skills in emergent bilingual preschool children: Exploring a factor-dependent approach (2019) · cites this paper as Kroll & Stewart, 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,003
Treatment for Anomia in Bilingual Speakers with Progressive Aphasia
Grasso, S. M., Peña, E. D., Kazemi, N., Mirzapour, H., Neupané, R., Bonakdarpour, B., Gorno‐Tempini, M. L., & Henry, M. L. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11111371 · Cited by 24
False friends or real friends? False cognates show advantage in word form learning.
Marecka, M., Szewczyk, J. M., Otwinowska, A., Durlik, J., Foryś-Nogala, M., Kutyłowska, K., & Wodniecka, Z. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104477 · Cited by 23
On Language and Thought: Bilingual Experience Influences Semantic Associations
Ning, S.-Q., Hayakawa, S., Bartolotti, J., & Marian, V. (2020) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100932 · Cited by 23
The internal context of bilingual processing
Truscott, J., & Smith, M. S. (2019) · Bilingual processing and acquisition · doi:10.1075/bpa.8 · Cited by 22
Perceptual Representations in L1, L2 and L3 Comprehension: Delayed Sentence–Picture Verification
Chen, D., Wang, R.-M., Zhang, J.-Q., & Liu, C. (2019) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-019-09670-x · Cited by 23
Francis, W. (2018) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/1367006918814375 · Cited by 23
“…bilingual lexical representation and processing, for example, the bilingual interactive activation model (Dijkstra & Van Heuven, 2002), the inhibitory control model (Green, 1998), the revised hierarchical model (Kroll & Stewart, 1994), and the distributed features model (Van Hell & de Groot, 1998).”
Muscalu, L. M., & Smiley, P. (2018) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728918000792 · Cited by 23
“…& Wodniecka, 2006; Kroll, Dijkstra, Janssen & Schriefers, 2000), whereas interference was interpreted as dual activation with impeded selection, due to (temporarily) unresolved competition between L1 and L2 representations (Costa et al., 1999; Green, 1998; Hermans, 2004; Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAlcántara-Pilar, J., del Barrio-García, S., & Rodríguez-López, M. (2018) · Journal of business research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.011 · Cited by 23
The role of language proficiency in producing false memories
Arndt, J. D., & Beato, M. S. (2017) · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.03.004 · Cited by 23
Lexical access in the second year: a study of monolingual and bilingual vocabulary development
Anda, S. D., Hendrickson, K., Zesiger, P., Poulin‐Dubois, D., & Friend, M. (2017) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728917000220 · Cited by 31
“Prominent models of adult bilingual language organization posit differential effects of language dominance on processing (e.g., Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundResultFerreira, A., & Schwieter, J. W. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781119241485.ch5 · Cited by 23
Ben-David, B. M., Avivi-Reich, M., & Schneider, B. (2016) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.07.016 · Cited by 23
“The notion that changes in perception in older adults may cause changes in cognition has been supported by a number of studies, which found that perceptual and cognitive processes tend to be highly correlated in older adults (Lindenberger and Baltes, 1994; Baltes and Lindenberger, 1997).”
ResultSoskey, L., Holcomb, P., & Midgley, K. J. (2016) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2016.05.028 · Cited by 23
“, as in the RHMmodel of Kroll and Stewart, 1994). According to this view N400s to new L2 items should not necessarily differ from those recorded to their L1 translation equivalents, although there might be a delay in the time course of the N400 due to the extra step of L2 to L1 lexical mapping. Alternatively, N400s to…”
Of minds and men – computers and translators
Martín, R. M. (2016) · Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics · doi:10.1515/psicl-2016-0013 · Cited by 26
Nip, I. S. B., & Blumenfeld, H. K. (2015) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-s-13-0299 · Cited by 29
Lie, truth, lie: the role of task switching in a deception context
Debey, E., Liefooghe, B., Houwer, J. D., & Verschuère, B. (2014) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0582-4 · Cited by 21
Head start for target language in bilingual listening.
FitzPatrick, I., & Indefrey, P. (2014) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.10.014 · Cited by 23
“And if so, to what extent is this cross-linguistic activation modulated by context?”
BackgroundHuman Behavior in Military Contexts
National Research Council (2008) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/12023 · Cited by 83
Investigating Bilingual Processing: The Neglected Role of Language Processing Contexts
Wu, Y.-J., & Thierry, G. (2010) · Front. Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00178 · Cited by 23
Aphasia in a bilingual user of British signlanguage and english: Effects of cross-linguistic cues
Marshall, J., Atkinson, J., Woll, B., & Thacker, A. (2005) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643290442000266 · Cited by 23
“A later study produced more complex findings (Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundSnellings, P., van Gelderen, A. V., & de Glopper, K. (2004) · doi:10.1191/0265532204lt276oa · Cited by 23
“From theoretical accounts of the bilingual lexicon (Kroll and Stewart, 1994) it can be deduced that lexical access is similar to lexical retrieval but not identical as the process develops in a diŒerent direction; from form to meaning (lexical access) instead of from meaning to form (lexical retrieval).”
BackgroundReadability for foreign language learning: the importance of cognates
Beinborn, L., Zesch, T., & Gurevych, I. (2014) · ITL Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/itl.165.2.02bei · Cited by 23
“Kroll and Stewart (1994) propose the revised hierarchical model that combines the two ideas.”
BackgroundInfluentialCognitive Factors of Lexical Availability in a Second Language
Muñoz, N. H., Izura, C., & Tomé, C. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7158-1_10 · Cited by 23
Lin, Y.-L. (2021) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211044584 · Cited by 22
“The revised hierarchical model (Kroll & Stewart, 1994) posits that first language (L1) and L2 word forms are associated with a common conceptual system.”
Cognitive and brain reserve in bilinguals: field overview and explanatory mechanisms
Gallo, F., Myachykov, A., Юрьевич, Ш. Ю., & Abutalebi, J. (2020) · Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science · doi:10.1007/s41809-020-00058-1 · Cited by 30
Context Effect on L2 Word Recognition: Visual Versus Auditory Modalities
Batel, E. (2019) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-019-09683-6 · Cited by 22
Language dominance predicts cognate effects and inhibitory control in young adult bilinguals
Anthony, J. J. D. R., & Blumenfeld, H. K. (2018) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728918001013 · Cited by 37
“As bilinguals may house overlapping representations for words across their languages (Dijkstra & van Heuven, 2002; Kroll & Stewart, 1994), cognate words that share similar orthographic or phonological form have been shown to have facilitatory effects in processing (e.g., Gollan et al., 2007; Kelley…”
Backgroundvon Holzen, K., Fennell, C. T., & Mani, N. (2018) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728918000597 · Cited by 22
“According to the Revised Hierarchical Model (Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Kroll, van Hell, Tokowicz & Green, 2010), lexical access to the L2 proceeds through mediation via its L1 translation equivalent until the individual has gathered enough skill in their L2 to directly access meaning.”
BackgroundMethodPlat, R., Lowie, W., & de Bot, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02256 · Cited by 22
“…comparing L1 to L2 naming is a speed difference; naming in the L2 has repeatedly been shown to be slower than naming in the L1 (e.g., experiment 3, Kroll and Stewart, 1994; La Heij et al., 1996; Van Wijnendaele and Brysbaert, 2002), even for fluent, (nearly) balanced bilinguals (Potter et al.,…”
BackgroundHoedemaker, R. S., Ernst, J., Meyer, A., & Belke, E. (2016) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.007 · Cited by 22
“…repeated access to a semantic category strengthens the connections between the lexical concepts that are being retrieved and their shared conceptual features, which results in the durable accumulation of activation within the conceptual level (Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Belke, Meyer, & Damian, 2005).”
BackgroundGarcía, A. (2015) · Meta Journal des traducteurs · doi:10.7202/1032402ar · Cited by 22
Ecke, P., & Hall, C. J. (2014) · doi:10.5007/1984-8412.2014v11n3p360 · Cited by 22
“Mediating lexical links and direct conceptual links (ALTARRIBA; MATHIS, 1997; KROLL; STEWART, 1994) are other terms for compound and subordinate configurations in the lexicon.”
BackgroundMethodCheng, C., Wang, M., & Perfetti, C. (2011) · doi:10.1017/s0142716411000221 · Cited by 22
“Libben et al. (2003) investigated constituent activation of the four types of compounds (TT, OT, TO, and OO).”
BackgroundChapter 2. Acquiring second language vocabulary through the use of images and words
Altarriba, J., & Knickerbocker, H. (2011) · doi:10.1075/lllt.30.06alt · Cited by 22
“J oh n B en ja m in s Pu bl is hi ng C om pa ny translation from L2 to L1 to determine the semantic information of an L2 word (Kroll & Stewart 1994).”
BackgroundNaming actions and objects in bilingual aphasia : a multiple case study
Poncelet, M., Majerus, S., Raman, I., Warginaire, S., & Weekes, B. (2007) · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.07.078 · Cited by 22
Diversity and Unity of Modularity
Seok, B. (2006) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_52 · Cited by 20
“These differential access patterns produce modular translation processes; the translation process from L1 to L2 is different from the L2 to L1 translation process (Kroll & Sholl, 1992; Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundMethodWhy is short-term sentence recall verbatim? An evaluation of the role of lexical priming
Lee, M.-W., & Williams, J. N. (1997) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03201109 · Cited by 22
Vocabulary Development in Early Language Education
Sun, H. Q., & Yin, B. (2020) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47073-9_3-1 · Cited by 11
Blot, K., Zárate, M. A., & Paulus, P. (2003) · Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1026//617-3169.50.3.171 · Cited by 22
Li, H., Cao, Y., Chen, C.-S., Liu, X., Zhang, S., & Mei, L. (2022) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.26195 · Cited by 21
“Such research has led to the Revised Hierarchical Model, which proposes that the native and second languages share semantic representations but have distinct orthographic and phonological representations (Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Kroll & Tokowicz, 2005).”
BackgroundCrosslinguistic influence and second language learning
Wang, Z. (2022) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2022.2076554 · Cited by 21
Does writing words in notes contribute to vocabulary learning?
Jin, Z.-H., & Webb, S. (2021) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211062184 · Cited by 21
“This is supported by the RHM which suggests that a strong lexical connection, which requires semantic processing, is established when FL is translated to L1, and hence reinforces semantic connections between FL words and the semantic system (Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
Feng, C., Damian, M. F., & Qu, Q. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01675 · Cited by 28
“In its semantic form, this task is commonly used to explore lexical-semantic retrieval (Abdel Rahman & Melinger, 2007; Aristei, Melinger, & Abdel Rahman, 2011; Damian, Vigliocco, & Levelt, 2001; Kroll & Stewart 1994).”
BackgroundMethodChaouch-Orozco, A., Alonso, J. G., & Rothman, J. (2020) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s014271642000082x · Cited by 21
“That is, words from all languages are simultaneously active, to some degree, in comprehension and production (e.g., de Groot, Delmaar, & Lupker, 2000; Dijkstra, Grainger, & van Heuven, 1999; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; van Heuven, Schriefers, Dijkstra, & Hagoort, 2008).”
BackgroundHosemann, J., Mani, N., Herrmann, A., Steinbach, M., & Altvater‐Mackensen, N. (2020) · Glossa a journal of general linguistics · doi:10.5334/gjgl.1014 · Cited by 21
He, Y., Wang, M., Li, D., & Yuan, Z. (2017) · Biomedical Optics Express · doi:10.1364/boe.8.005399 · Cited by 48
Teaching Chinese as an International Language: A Singapore Perspective
Goh, Y.-S. (2017) · doi:10.1017/9781107280472 · Cited by 21
Aspects of a Cognitive Model of Translation
Shreve, G., & Lacruz, I. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781119241485.ch7 · Cited by 21
The neural correlates of semantic and phonological transfer effects: language distance matters
Ghazi-Saidi, L., & Ansaldo, A. (2016) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s136672891600064x · Cited by 21
“Furthermore, event-related potential (ERP) studies suggest that extra strategic control is required when processing clangs, given that inhibition of the non-target semantic representation is required (Elston-Guttler, Paulmann & Kotz, 2005; Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundFunctional correlates of preserved naming performance in amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.
Catricalà, E., Rosa, P. D. D., Parisi, L., Zippo, A., Borsa, V., Iadanza, A., Castiglioni, I., Falini, A., & Cappa, S. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.009 · Cited by 21
“It must be underlined that, while naming latencies in the homogeneous condition, when compared to blocks in the heterogeneous condition, are generally longer (Damian et al., 2001; Levelt et al., 1999; Kroll and Stewart, 1994), in the present study the functional alterations do not appear to be due to the overall diffi…”
BackgroundMorphological Family Size effects in L1 and L2 processing: An electrophysiological study
Mulder, K., Schreuder, R., & Dijkstra, T. (2013) · doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.733013 · Cited by 21
“…to control words (e.g., De Groot & Nas, 1991; Dijkstra, Grainger, & Van Heuven, 1999; Dijkstra, Van Jaarsveld, & Ten Brinke, 1998; Dijkstra et al., 2010; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Lemhöfer et al., 2008; Sanchez-Casas, Davis, & Garcia-Albea, 1992; Schwartz, Kroll, & Diaz, 2007; Voga & Grainger, 2007).”
The Bilingual Language Interaction Network for Comprehension of Speech
Shook, A., & Marian, V. (2012) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728912000466 · Cited by 298
“Bilinguals are further affected by features specific to multilingual experience, like age of second language acquisition, relative proficiency in the two languages, and language dominance (Bates, Devescovi & Wulfeck, 2001; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Marian, 2008).”
Referent salience affects second language article use*
Trenkic, D., & Pongpairoj, N. (2012) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728912000156 · Cited by 21
Senior Chinese high school students' awareness of thematic and taxonomic relations in L1 and L2*
Li, D.-G., Zhang, X., & Wang, G.-Y. (2010) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728910000416 · Cited by 21
“Kroll and Stewart (1994) combined the two models and proposed the revised hierarchical model (RHM), which has become one of the most cited models in bilingualism research.”
BackgroundSemantic interference in object naming: An fMRI study of the postcue naming paradigm
Hocking, J., Mcmahon, K., & de Zubicaray, G. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.067 · Cited by 21
“…competitor priming in which objects to be named are preceded by naming to definition of related or unrelated items (Wheeldon and Monsell, 1994) and semantic blocking in which objects to be named are blocked within category, compared to items blocked between category (Kroll and Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundSubsyllabic unit preference in young Chinese children
Wang, M., & Cheng, C. (2008) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716407080137 · Cited by 21
Semantic priming over unrelated trials: Evidence for different effects in word and picture naming
Vitkovitch, M., Cooper-Pye, E., & Leadbetter, A. (2006) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193590 · Cited by 21
“The interfering effect of semantically related words during picture naming fits with results from other experimental paradigms demonstrating semantic competition during picture naming (e.g., Damian, Vigliocco, & Levelt, 2001; Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Vitkovitch & Humphreys, 1991; Wheeldon & Monsell, 1994).”
ResultThe Stroop effect in English-Japanese bilinguals: the effect of phonological similarity.
Sumiya, H., & Healy, A. (2008) · Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.2.93 · Cited by 21
Li, R., & Kiran, S. (2023) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2023.2189994 · Cited by 20
“This finding can also be explained by the Revised Hierarchical Model (Kroll & Stewart, 1994), which assumes a stronger link between the conceptual system and lexical system of L1 than between the conceptual system and lexical system of L2.”
BackgroundResultBlom, E., Soto‐Corominas, A., Attar, Z., Daskalaki, E., & Paradis, J. (2021) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716421000229 · Cited by 25
“As the two languages of a bilingual may share a conceptual store (Kroll & Stewart, 1994; Kroll et al., 2010), transfer effects in the domain of vocabulary could indeed be expected, as vocabulary items consist of mappings between phonological forms and conceptual representations.”
L1 activation during L2 processing is modulated by both age of acquisition and proficiency
Berghoff, R., McLoughlin, J., & Bylund, E. (2021) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100979 · Cited by 20
Paolieri, D., Demestre, J., Guasch, M., Bajo, M. T., & Ferré, P. (2020) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728920000073 · Cited by 28
“…gender, they propose an integrated lexicon (e.g., BIA+ model; Dijkstra & Van Heuven, 2002 and Multilink; Dijkstra, Wahl, Buytenhuijs, Van Halem, Al-Jibouri, De Korte & Rekké, 2019) or a direct influence between the two languages at the level of lexical representations (RHM; Kroll & Stewart, 1994).”
MethodFunctional plasticity associated with language learning in adults
Gurunandan, K., Carreiras, M., & Paz‐Alonso, P. M. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116040 · Cited by 52
A systems theory perspective on the translation process
Carl, M., Tonge, A., & Lacruz, I. (2019) · Translation Cognition & Behavior · doi:10.1075/tcb.00026.car · Cited by 20
L2 primes L1 – translation priming in LDT and semantic categorisation with unbalanced bilinguals*
Lijewska, A., Ziegler, M., & Olko, S. (2018) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2016.1214103 · Cited by 20
The Impact of Individual Differences on a Bilingual Vocabulary Approach for Latino Preschoolers
Méndez, L. I., Crais, E. R., & Kainz, K. (2018) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2018_jslhr-l-17-0186 · Cited by 29
The N400 as a window into lexico-semantic processing in bilingualism
Jankowiak, K., & Rataj, K. (2017) · Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics · doi:10.1515/psicl-2017-0006 · Cited by 20
Radman, N., Spierer, L., Laganaro, M., Annoni, J., & Colombo, F. (2015) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2015.1047383 · Cited by 18
“…data indicate that in bilinguals, partly shared brain structures support lexical and morphosyntactic representations of the first (L1) and the second language (L2) (Goral, Levy, & Kastl, 2007; Kroll & Stewart, 1994), with the degree of overlap mostly depending on proficiency in the second language.”
BackgroundMethodFerré, P., Sánchez-Casas, R., Comesaña, M., & Demestre, J. (2016) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728916000262 · Cited by 20
“…two languages (i.e., whether they are represented in two different systems or in a single system), the most influential theoretical models assume a shared conceptual representation between the two languages (de Groot, 1992a; Kroll & Stewart, 1994, see also Kroll & Tokowicz, 2005, for an overview).”
BackgroundMoldovan, C. D., Demestre, J., Ferré, P., & Sánchez‐Casas, R. (2015) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.07.002 · Cited by 40
Lexical Planning in Sentence Production Is Highly Incremental: Evidence from ERPs
Zhao, L.-M., & Yang, Y.-F. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146359 · Cited by 20
Lexical selection differences between monolingual and bilingual listeners
Friesen, D. C., Chung-Fat-Yim, A., & Bialystok, E. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.11.001 · Cited by 18
“, Dijkstra & van Heuven , 2002 ; Kroll & Stewart , 1994 ) and that semantic processing in the absence of language does not differ for monolinguals and bilinguals .”
Neural stages of spoken, written, and signed word processing in beginning second language learners
Leonard, M. K., Ramírez, N. F., Torres, C., Hatrak, M., Mayberry, R. I., & Halgren, E. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00322 · Cited by 55
Bilingual compound processing: The effects of constituent frequency and semantic transparency
Wang, M., Lin, C., & Gao, W. (2010) · Writing Systems Research · doi:10.1093/wsr/wsq012 · Cited by 20
“A well-known model of bilingual lexical processing is the revised hierarchical model (RHM) proposed by Kroll and Stewart (1994) .”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBilingual Memory: The Interaction of Language and Thought
Haritos, C., & Nelson, K. (2001) · doi:10.1080/15235882.2001.11074469 · Cited by 20
Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second languages
Catálan, R. J. (2014) · Educational linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7158-1 · Cited by 20
The Multilingual Lexicon: Modelling Selection and Control
de Bot, K. (2004) · International Journal of Multilingualism · doi:10.1080/14790710408668176 · Cited by 19
“In the bilingual literature three models are dominant: the Bilingual Interactive Activation model of Dijkstra and his colleagues (Dijkstra & Van Heuven, 1998), Kroll’s Revised Hierarchical model (Kroll, 1993; Kroll & Stewart, 1994) and Grosjean’s Language Mode model (Grosjean, 1997).”
Foreign languages in advertising: Theoretical implications for language-related IB research
Hornikx, J., van Meurs, F., & Tenzer, H. (2023) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-023-00639-6 · Cited by 19
“Whereas the RHM helps to understand how this shared code may enhance foreign language comprehension by means of simplification, the CFM would introduce a cautionary note by highlighting shifting connotations and meanings.”
InfluentialChou, I.-C., Liu, K.-L., & Zhao, N. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781610 · Cited by 19
Filipović, L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108602235 · Cited by 19
Processing of Translation-Ambiguous Words by Chinese–English Bilinguals in Sentence Context
Zhou, G.-W., Chen, Y., Feng, Y., & Zhou, R. (2019) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-019-09650-1 · Cited by 19
Raichlin, R., Walters, J., & Altman, C. (2018) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/1367006918763135 · Cited by 22
“…for their findings, one based on difficulties (of unbalanced bilingual children) in syntactic processing and the other based on their task, which is described as more conceptually mediated than the lexical processing tasks for which Kroll and Stewart (1994) report directionality effects.”
BackgroundForeign language reduces the longevity of the repetition-based truth effect
Nadarevic, L., Plier, S., Thielmann, I., & Darancó, S. (2018) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.08.019 · Cited by 22
Smith, Y., Walters, J., & Prior, A. (2017) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728917000645 · Cited by 19
“Keywords: priming, frequency, BIA, RHM, cross-language, within-language”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLanguage deterioration in bilingual Alzheimer's disease patients: A longitudinal study
Calabria, M., Cattaneo, G., Marne, P., Hernández, M., Juncadella, M., Gascón-Bayarri, J., Sala, I., Lleó, A., Ortiz-Gil, J., Ugas, L., et al. (2017) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.06.005 · Cited by 19
Rinsveld, A. M. V., Schiltz, C., Landerl, K., Brunner, M., & Ugen, S. (2016) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-016-0762-9 · Cited by 25
Riley, E., Mcmahon, K., & de Zubicaray, G. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00578 · Cited by 19
“Participants are slower to name objects in homogeneous compared to heterogeneous blocks (Kroll and Stewart, 1994; Damian et al., 2001; Damian and Als, 2005; Abdel Rahman and Melinger, 2007).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialModeling activation and effective connectivity of VWFA in same script bilinguals
Boukrina, O., Hanson, S. J., & Hanson, C. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22348 · Cited by 19
“…reading, which show that for most bilinguals there is an asymmetry of cross-language interaction as a function of language experience and use [e.g., Kroll and Stewart, 1994]; our results indicated that the VWFA deactivation may be modulated by stimulusspecific factors, such as target language…”
ResultParallel processing in language production
Melinger, A., Branigan, H., & Pickering, M. (2014) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.906635 · Cited by 19
“…of pictures, naming times are slower (Abdel Rahman & Melinger, 2007; Belke, 2008; Belke, Meyer, & Damian, 2005; Damian, Vigliocco, & Levelt, 2001; Kroll & Stewart, 1994) and naming accuracy is lower (Schnur et al., 2006) when all the pictures are drawn from a common semantic category (a…”
BackgroundZhang, X., Han, Z.-Z., & Bi, Y. (2012) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716412000124 · Cited by 19
“We therefore turned to a paradigm developed by Kroll and Stewart (1994)—the Applied Psycholinguistics 34:5 1063 Zhang et al.: Representation of abstract and concrete concepts blocked translation—where semantic relationship produced interference effects.”
BackgroundMethodIssues in bilingual aphasia: An introduction
Weekes, B. (2010) · doi:10.1080/02687030902958274 · Cited by 19
“The paper by Hernandez and colleagues tests a model of translation by Kroll and Stewart ( 1994 ).”
BackgroundDetry, C., Pillon, A., & de Partz, M. (2005) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.014 · Cited by 19
“, the French word /tabl/ and the English word /teIbl/, both meaning ‘‘table’’) are inter-connected within the bilingual lexicon, whereas Kroll and Stewart (1994) argued that the existence of crosslanguage connections was not dependent on the words being cognates or not.”
BackgroundTransfer of refractory states across languages in a global aphasic patient
Ferrand, L., & Humphreys, G. (1996) · doi:10.1080/026432996381692 · Cited by 19
Adult Second-Language Reading Research: How May It Inform Assessment and Instruction?.
Carlo, M. S., & Sylvester, E. (1996) · doi:10.1037/e402602005-001 · Cited by 19
“This model, known as the Concept Mediation Model, characterizes fluent bilinguals as having separate lexicons in each language with links to a shared and amodal semantic memory store (Kroll & Stewart, 1992; Potter, So, Von Eckardt, & Feldman, 1984).”
MethodInhibitory control processes and lexical access in trilingual speech production
Schwieter, J. W., & Sunderman, G. L. (2011) · Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/lab.1.4.02sch · Cited by 19
Cognates as lexical choices in translation: interference in space-constrained environments
Tercedor, M. (2010) · doi:10.1075/target.22.2.01ter · Cited by 19
The Neurolinguistics of Bilingualism in the Next Decades
Paradis, M. (2000) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2245 · Cited by 19
Chen, C., Gong, X. L., Tseng, C., Klein, D. L., Gallant, J. L., & Deniz, F. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.06.24.600505 · Cited by 18
Xu, H., & Liu, K. (2024) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103778 · Cited by 18
“…’ s asymmetric possession of linguistic resources in L1 and L2 a ff ects their language processing capacity in comprehension and production, thus generating di ff erent sets of evidence to support ‘ native ’ versus ‘ retour ’ interpreting (Godijns and Hinderdael, 2005; Kroll and Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundBilingual Language Control Flexibly Adapts to Cultural Context
Liu, C., Li, L., Jiao, L., & Wang, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744289 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E.
- Affiliations
- Mount Holyoke College (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-174
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008457707
- Cited by
- 2,656
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 123 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 184 · 2019: 184 · 2018: 155 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 128 · 2015: 132 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 131
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- bilingual translation, picture naming, word retrieval, semantic classification, word naming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review