Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,138

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality

Open access
GINTIS, HERBERT·2000·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2111

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,138

Metadata

Authors
GINTIS, H.
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
206
Issue
2
Pages
169-179
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152634578
Cited by
1,138
References
5
FWCI
75.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2111
The paper
GINTIS, H. (2000). Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.