Cited by 237Visual perception and processing mechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationMemory Processes and Influences

Reopening the Mental Imagery Debate: Lessons from Functional Anatomy

Mellet, E., Petit, L., Mazoyer, B., Denis, M., Tzourio, N.·1998·NeuroImage

Abstract

Over the past few years, the neural bases of mental imagery have been both a topic of intense debate and a domain of extensive investigations using either PET or fMRI that have provided new insights into the cortical anatomy of this cognitive function. Several studies have in fact demonstrated that there exist types of mental imagery that do not rely on primary/early visual areas, whereas a consensus now exists on the validity of the dorsal/ventral-route model in the imagery domain. More importantly, these studies have provided evidence that, in addition to higher order visual areas, mental imagery shares common brain areas with other major cognitive functions, such as language, memory, and movement, depending on the nature of the imagery task. This body of recent results indicates that there is no unique mental imagery cortical network; rather, it reflects the high degree of interaction between mental imagery and other cognitive functions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/nimg.1998.0355

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mental imagery is complex and necessarily involves distributed neural systems.

    “Moreover, mental imagery is surely a complex process that must involve distributed neural systems (Mellet et al., 1998; Handy et al., 2004; Mechelli et al., 2004; Sack et al., 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mellet, E., Petit, L., Mazoyer, B., Denis, M., & Tzourio, N.
Affiliations
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-08
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
129-139
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119473470
Cited by
237
References
96
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
mental imagery, visual cortex, primary visual cortex, cortical networks, functional anatomy
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Mental Recall, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review